wise use of mires and peatlands - Peatland Ecology Research Group

FRAMEWORK FOR WISE USE1253. There is no single set of concepts orprinciples which can govern everysituation. Different considerations applyin different cases: it is not possible toreduce all complexities to simple principlesor single measures. (§4.5)4. The first stage in taking any decision is todescribe the issue or issues to be resolved.The rules to be then taken into accountinclude:● The alternative which achieves thedesired end in the best way should beadopted.● Preference should be given to thealternative which is most likely to achievethe desired outcome.● Preference should be given to thealternative which achieves all of the directaims and further aims in addition. (Table4/3)As an illustration of how such generalconsiderations can be helpful a checklistfollows (Table 5/3). A negative answer doesnot necessarily mean that a use / interventionshould be excluded. Not all the generalconsiderations lend themselves to use in achecklist.5.4 GUIDANCE PRINCIPLES FORWISE USEThe following guidance principles are set outas an aid to resolving issues which arise indecisions relating to interventions in thefundamental properties of peatlands andmires.1. The principle of clarity 9 : concepts shouldhave clear content; terms should be clear andconsistently applied.2.The principle of public access toinformation: the public should have adequateaccess to information regarding proposeddecisions 10 . The information should betransparent and understandable.3. The principle of public participation:interventions should follow a consultationprocess in which all stakeholders 11 canactively and effectively participate 12.4. The principle of motivation: interventionsshould be motivated by the prospect ofgreater advantage 13 for society 14 .5. The principle of careful decision-making:decisions should be made on the basis of thebest available information 15 .What are the aims of the proposed intervention; will the proposedintervention achieve them; and will it achieve them in the best way.Does the proposed intervention interfere with a fundamental humanright. OrDoes the proposed intervention reinforce a fundamental human right.Do the aims of the intervention relate to genuine needs, or merelyto wants.Will the benefits accrue in an egalitarian manner, not just to a privilegedfew (including taking future people into account).Table 5/3. Checklist against the General Considerations - Elements to be considered whendecisions arise as to the use of a mire or peatland