index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTProtection from Abuse Cases. [Scott v. Shay, 928 A.2d.312 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Michael E. Bertin. 29:137-39.Superior Court Affirms Order of Trial Court DirectingAbused Woman to Pay Perpetrator Money per theTerms of a Consent Order. [Lee v. Carney, 435 Pa.Super. 405, 645 A.2d 1363 (1993)]. 16(5):7-8.Violation of Abuse Act Order is Indirect CriminalContempt and Due Process Must be Afforded. [Vito v.Vito, 380 Pa. Super. 258, 551 A.2d 471 (1988)]. 10:65-66.Violation of the Protection of the Abuse Act: IndirectCriminal Contempt. [Wagner v. Wagner, 387 Pa. Super.246, 564 A.2d 162 (1989)]. 10(4):104-5.Where No Petition to Modify was Filed, the Trial CourtDismissal of the PFA Order was Improper. [Stamus v.Dutcavich, 938 A.2d 1098 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. John P.Attiani. 30:84-86.REPLEVINReplevin Action Pre-Empted by the Divorce Code.[Kramer v. Kramer, 110 Montg. Co. L. Rep. 135(1982)]. 3:338-39.RES JUDICATAChild Support Complaint Barred Based on ResJudicata, Superior Court Declares. [Scott v. Mershon,394 Pa. Super. 411, 576 A.2d 67 (1995)]. 17(4):6.SANCTIONParty Prejudice from Introducing Evidence as aJustifiable Discovery Sanction. [Hein v. Hein, 717 A.2d1053 (Pa. Super. 1998)]. Stephanie H. Bacine. 21:4-5.SEPARATION AGREEMENTSSupreme Court Differentiates Between Postnuptial andSeparation Agreements. [Vaccarello v.Vaccarello, 563Pa. 93, 757 A.2d 909 (2000)]. Maribeth Blessing. 23:4-8.SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTSAgreements Which are Incorporated, but not Merged,are Non-Modifiable. [McGough v. McGough, 361 Pa.Super. 391, 522 A.2d 638 (1987)]. 8:958-59.Effect of 401.1(b) on Pre-1988 Property SettlementAgreements. [Brangs v. Brangs, 407 Pa. Super. 43, 595A.2d 115 (1991)]. 12(4):4-5.Enforcement Procedure of Pre-1988 UnmergedProperty Settlement Agreement. [Jackson v. Culp, 400Pa. Super. 519, 583 A.2d 1236 (1990)]. 12(2):2.Husband's "Guilt Trip" Against Well-informed WifeWon't Visciate Separation Agreement. [Adams v.Adams, 414 Pa. Super. 634, 607 A.2d 1116 (1992)].13(4):8-9.Incorporation or Merger: Modification of Agreement.[Ballestrino v. Ballestrino, 400 Pa. Super. 237, 583A.2d 474 (1990)]. 12(1):4-5.Marriage Settlement Agreement Upheld When Spouseof Business Owner Fully Engaged in Couple’s FinancialAffairs and Involved in Business. [Paroly v. Paroly, 876A.2d 1061 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. Christine Gale. 27:120-21.Modifiability of Property Settlement Agreement. [Com.ex rel. Tokach v. Tokach, 326 Pa. Super. 359, 474 A.2d41 (1984)]. 5:571-72.Punitive Damages: Failure to Fully Disclose. [Hess v.Hess, 397 Pa. Super. 395, 580 A.2d 357 (1990)].11:185.Stress but No Duress: Agreement Valid. [Adams v.Adams, 848 A.2d 991 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. Michael E.Bertin. 26:45-46.Superior Court Imposes Contractual Duty of GoodFaith and Fair Dealing in Performance and Enforcementon Parties to a Marriage Settlement Agreement.[Herzog v. Herzog, 887 A 2d. 313 (Pa. Super. 2005)].David C. Schanbacher. 28:8-10.Tokach is Overlooked. [D'huy v. D'huy, 390 Pa. Super.509, 568 A.2d 1289 (1990)]. 11:131-32.Trial Court had Jurisdiction to Enforce Marital PropertySettlement Agreement under Divorce Code WhereAgreement had not been Merged or Incorporated into91