index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTWithdrawal of Affidavit of Consent Prior to Entry ofDivorce Decree is Permissible. [Berman v. Berman, 4A.C.D.D. 102 (1983)]. 4:450-51.DIVORCE–ACTIONS IN MORE THANONE COUNTYDivorce–Simultaneous Actions in Two Counties. [Bemv. Bem, 30 Chester Co. Rep. 276 (1982)]. 3:340Divorce–Two Cases can be Pending in Two Countiesuntil Appellate Courts Rule Otherwise. [Ravetz v.Ravetz, Montg. Co., No. 80-10116 (1981)]. 2:186-87.DIVORCE-ALIMONYAlimony–Husband Ordered to Pay Wife Alimony forIndefinite Period of Time. [Orange v. Orange,Westmoreland Co., 5949 Civil 1980 (1981)]. 2:205-6.Alimony–Provisions of §501 are to be Read inConjunction With One Another. [Hess v. Hess, 327 Pa.Super. 279, 475 A.2d 796 (1984)]. 5:576-579.Alimony–Section 501 Provisions to be Read inConjunction With One Another. [Bickley v. Bickley,301 Pa. Super. 396, 447 A.2d 1025 (1982)]. 3:302-6.Alimony Award and Standard of Living. [Edelstein v.Edelstein, 399 Pa. Super. 536, 582 A.2d 1074 (1990)].12(1):2.Alimony Award Upheld to Effectuate 50-50 EquitableDistribution Split. [Uhler v. Uhler, 406 Pa. Super. 414,594 A.2d 688 (1991)]. 12(5):5.Alimony in Accordance With Standard of Living.[Kutzer v. Kutzer, Montg. Co., No. 79-396 (1982)].3:262-65.Alimony Modification Due to Voluntary Retirement.[McFadden v. McFadden, 386 Pa. Super. 506, 563A.2d 180 (1989)]. 10(4):111-12.Alimony not Terminable for Same-Sex Cohabitation.[Kripp v. Kripp, 784 A.2d 158 (Pa. Super 2001)].Gerald J. Schorr. 24:6-8.Alimony Provisions in Separation Agreement Reducedto Court Order are Non-Modifiable. [Blackson v.Blackson, Mercer Co., 39 EQ. 1978 (1981)]. 3:341-42.Alimony vs. Property Settlement Payable inInstallments. [Goninen, Jr. v. Commissioner, 47 TCM49,698 (1983) and Lewis v. Commissioner, 47 TCM49,699 (1983)]. 5:528.Child's Illness Warrants Continuation of Alimony toMother. [Soncini v. Soncini, 417 Pa. Super. 393, 612A.2d 998 (1992)]. 13(4):6-7.Court Awards Wife Alimony of Unlimited Duration.[Pacella v. Pacella, 342 Pa. Super. 178, 492 A.2d 707(1985)]. 7:835-37.Court Awards Wife Permanent Alimony. [Pacella v.Pacella, Allegh. Co., No 517 of 1979 (1982)]. 4:441-44.Court Cannot Dismiss Divorce Complaint Sua SponteWithout Affording Plaintiff Prior Notice. [Hoffman v.Hoffman, 350 Pa. Super. 1280, 504 A.2d 356(1986)]7:838.Court Vacates Divorce Decree upon Finding ExtrinsicFraud. [Fenstermaker v. Fenstermaker, 348 Pa. Super.237, 502 A.2d 185 (1985)]. 7:813-16.Courts Have Equitable Powers Under Section 401(c) toAward Reimbursement Alimony. [Lehmicke v.Lehmicke, 339 Pa. Super. 559, 489 A.2d 782 (1985)].6:692-96.Effect of Cohabitation on Alimony Agreement.[Vankirk v. Vankirk, 336 Pa. Super. 502, 485 A.2d1194 (1984)]. 5:654-55.Entrepreneur Wife too Active for Permanent Alimony.[O'callaghan v. O'callaghan, 530 Pa. Super. 176, 607A.2d 735 (1992)]. 13(4):8.Entry of Divorce Decree Prerequisite to AncillaryRelief Order. [Dech v. Dech, 342 Pa. Super. 17, 492A.2d 41 (1985)]. 7:803-4.The 50/50 Starting Point. [Labuda v. Labuda, 349 Pa.Super. 524, 503 A.2d 971 (1986)]7:808-10.Garnish Gross, not Net, Wages for Alimony Arrearages,Superior Court Declares. [Goodstein v. Goodstein, 42273