index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE2004)]. Carolyn R. Mirabile. 26:41-42.Supreme Court Allows Legal Malpractice ClaimWhere Settlement was Entered in Divorce.[McMahon v. Shea, 547 Pa. 124, 688 A.2d 1179(1997)]. Robb B. Bunde. 19:33-34.The Supreme Court Considers Deprecation in theCalculation of Income Available for Support.[Labar v. Labar, 557 Pa. 54, 731 A.2d 1252(1999)]. Carol S. Mills McCarthy. 21:76-78.Supreme Court Declares that Standing in ChildSupport Cases Determined by CustodyOrder–Legislature Responds With De FactoCustody Statute. [Larson v. Diveglia, 549 Pa. 118,700 A.2d 931 (1997)]. Kenneth J. Horoho, Jr.20:6-8.Supreme Court Differentiates Between Postnuptialand Separation Agreements. [Vaccarellov.Vaccarello, 563 Pa. 93, 757 A.2d 909 (2000)].Maribeth Blessing. 23:4-8.Supreme Court Discusses Important CustodyFactors. [In Re: Shane Davis, 502 Pa. 110, 465A.2d 614 (1983)]. 4:493-502.Supreme Court Examines Extent of Applicabilityof 23 Pa.C.S. §3701(E) In Case Where MaritalProperty has Been Distributed. [Wagoner v.Wagoner, 538 Pa. 265, 648 A.2d 299 (1994)(1994)]. 17(1):12-14.Supreme Court Finds That Reasonableness Mustbe Implied When Determining an Award ofContractual Counsel Fees. [McMullen v. Kutz,985 A.2d 769 (Pa. 2009)]. Elizabeth J. Billies.32:18-20.Supreme Court Gives Grandparents Equal Right toAdopt Grandchildren. [Adoption of Hess, 530 Pa.218, 608 A.2d 10 (1992)]. 13(3):3-5.Supreme Court Holds that Trial Court Erred in notConsidering Children And Youth Services ofAllegheny County v. Chorgo in DeterminingWhether Obligor for Support is Entitled to CreditDue to Children's Receipt of Social SecurityMonies. [Preston v. Preston, 435 Pa. Super. 459,646 A.2d 1186 (1994)]. 16(5):5.Supreme Court Limits Fact Finder's Discretion inDeviating from the Support Guidelines. [Ball v.Minnick, 538 Pa. 441, 648 A.2d 1192 (1994)].16(5):2-4.Supreme Court Reaffirmed Third Party Burden inCustody Case Against Parent. [Charles v. Stehlik,560 Pa. 334, 744 A.2d 1255 (2000)]. Stephanie H.Winegrad. 22:33-34.Supreme Court Rejects the Theory that Marriageand Spousal Loans are Separate Transactions forPurposes of the Bankruptcy Recoupment Doctrine.[Cohen v. Goldberg, 554 Pa. 201, 720 A.2d 1028(1998)]. Selina J. Schultz. 21:5-6.Supreme Court's Change in Pension Valuation forEquitable Distribution Causes Dates for Valuationto be "Carved In Sand". [Berrington v. Berrington,534 Pa. 393, 633 A.2d 589 (1993)]. 15(1):2-4.Taking a "Fifth" in a Car Overrides Father's"Taking the Fifth" In Custody Hearing, DividedPanel Declares. [Sawko v. Sawko, 425 Pa. Super.450, 625 A.2d 692 (1993)]. 14(4):8-10.Tax Consequences–Relevant Factor to beConsidered in Making Alimony Pendente LiteAward. [Reisinger v. Reisinger, 3 A.C.D.D. 65(Allegh. Co., 1982)]. 3:335-336.Tax Consequences Must be Considered in SettingSupport Orders. [Reisinger v. Reisinger, 324 Pa.Super. 223, 471 A.2d 544 (1984)]. 5:529-530.Tax Consequences of Alimony PaymentsContinued After Remarriage of Former Spouse.[Sherwood v. Commissioner, 38 T.C.M. 1979-149(1979)]. 2:135-36.Tax Impact Must be Considered in EquitableDistribution Award. [White v. White, 382 Pa.Super. 478, 555 A.2d 1299 (1989) 10(2):76.Tax Liability is Attributable to Year in WhichIncome is Earned in Determining IncomeAvailable for Support. [Spahr v. Spahr, 869 A.2d548 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. Carolyn Moran Zack.55