CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee <strong>to</strong> Liability for Post-Divorce HealthBenefits Paid when No Health InsurancePremiums Paid. [Trustees of <strong>the</strong> AFTRA HealththFund v. Biondi, 303 F.2d 765 (7 Cir. 2002)].David I. Grunfeld. 24:106.Failure <strong>to</strong> State Issues in Statement of MattersComplained of On Appeal Constitutes Waiver ofIssues First Raised <strong>by</strong> Appellant in Superior CourtBrief. [Kelly v. Mueller, 912 A.2d 202 (Pa. Super.2006)]. Michelle S. Dawson. 29:19-20.Failure <strong>to</strong> Transcribe In Camera Interview ofMinor Child not Fatal <strong>to</strong> Trial Court DecisionWhen Some Facts Were Elicited fromMultipleO<strong>the</strong>r Witnesses. [N.H.M. v. P.O.T., 947 A.2d1268 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Kim Denise Mor<strong>to</strong>n.30:152-54.Failure <strong>to</strong> Value a Marital Asset. [Ratarsky v.Ratarsky, 383 Pa. Super. 445, 557 A.2d 83(1989)]. 10:90-91.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Convicted of First Degree Murder andServing Life Term Entitled <strong>to</strong> Evaluation andTreatment <strong>to</strong> Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Case. [Cramer v. Zgela, 969A.2d. 621 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. Pamela L. Purdy.31:100-1.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Denied Visitation Rights WithIncapacitated 25-Year Old Daughter Pursuant <strong>to</strong>her Wishes. [Estate of Haertsch, Appeal of:Haertsch Sr., 415 Pa. Super. 598, 609 A.2d 1384(1994)]. 17(1):4.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Given Second Chance After Running Afoulof Children’s Fast-Track Rules, But Loses onAppeal. [J.M.R. v. J.M., 1 A.3d 902 (Pa. Super.2010)]. Andrew D. Taylor. <strong>32</strong>:191-92.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Imprisoned for His Child's Mo<strong>the</strong>r'sMurder is "Barred" from Visiting Child. [Green v.Sneeringer, 431 Pa. Super. 66, 635 A.2d 1074(1993)]. 15(1):13-14.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Ordered <strong>to</strong> Contribute Toward Tuition forPrivate School for Emotionally DisturbedDaughter. [Stredny v. Gray, 353 Pa. Super. 376,510 A.2d 359 (1986)]. 7:879-81.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Ordered <strong>to</strong> Pay More Than $200,000 inSupport Arrearages Dating Back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1950's.[Bullock v. Bullock, 4<strong>32</strong> Pa. Super. 643, 639 A.2d826 (1994)]. 15(3):9-10.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Whose Parental Rights Were Terminatedhad No Standing <strong>to</strong> Petition for Cus<strong>to</strong>dy. [Morganv. Weisner, 923 A.2d 1123 (Pa. Super. 2007)].Kim Denise Mor<strong>to</strong>n. 29:85-86.Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s Failure <strong>to</strong> Exercise Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Does notExcuse Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Failure <strong>to</strong> Follow Parties’Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Order. [Hopkins v. Byes, 954 A.2d 654(Pa. Super. 2008)]. Amy J. Phillips. 30:205-8.Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s Paternal Rights Terminated in Favor OfMaternal Grandfa<strong>the</strong>r.[In Re Adoption of J.M.,991 A.2d <strong>32</strong>1 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Gerald L.Shoemaker. <strong>32</strong>:79-80.Federal Law Held not <strong>to</strong> Preempt Provisions ofMarital Property Settlement Agreement. [Eonda v.Affini<strong>to</strong>, 427 Pa. Super. 317, 629 A.2d 119(1993)]. 14(5):6-8.A Finding of of Criminal Contempt is ImmediatelyAppealable. [Diamond v. Diamond, 715 A.2d1190 (Pa. Super. 1998)]. Charles J. Meyer. 20:90-92.First Impression: Bifurcation Under <strong>the</strong> AmendedDivorce Code. [Bonawits v. Bonawits, 907 A.2d611 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. Michael E. Bertin.29:98-100.Forfeiture of Marital Interest in Pension TooHarsh a Remedy for Failure <strong>to</strong> Satisfy Court’sQDRO Requirements. [Prol v. Prol, 935 A.2d 547(Pa. Super. 2007)]. Maris J. Weiner. 29:133-34.Foreign Guardianship Order not Entitled <strong>to</strong>Recognition in Pennsylvania. [Hilkmann v.Hilkmann, 858 A.2d 58 (Pa. 2004)]. Brian C.Vertz. 26:105-6.Forum Non Conveniens Analyzed in Adoption/Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Proceedings. [In Re:Adoption of K.S.,399 Pa. Super. 29, 581 A.2d 659 (1990)].12(1):10-12.<strong>32</strong>
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEFoster Parents may not Adopt Over CYSObjection: Superior Court Refuses <strong>to</strong> ExtendSupreme Court's Decision In Re: Adoption of Hess<strong>to</strong> Foster Parents. [Chester County Children andYouth Services v. Cunningham, 431 Pa. Super.421, 636 A.2d 1157 (1994)]. 15(2):7-8.Frey and Separation: A Principle in Search of aStandard. [Frey v. Frey, 821 A.2d 623 (Pa. Super.2003)]. Mark R. Ash<strong>to</strong>n. 25:65-66.Future Social Security Earnings can Offset <strong>the</strong>Value of Civil Service Pensions. [Rimel v. Rimel,913 A.2d 289 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. Julia Swain.29:17-18.Garnish Gross, not Net, Wages for AlimonyArrearages, Superior Court Declares. [Goodsteinv. Goodstein, 422 Pa. Super. 331, 619 A.2d 703(1992)]. 14(2):6-8.Gates v. Gates: Alimony Award Linked <strong>to</strong>Emancipation of Child Improper. [Gates v. Gates,933 A.2d 102 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Aaron P. Asher.29:127-28.Getting Sirious.[Sirio v. Sirio, 951 A.2d 1188 (Pa.Super. 2008)]. David J. Draganosky. 30:159-63.Given a Conflict Between a Fault and No-FaultGround, No-Fault will Prevail. [Barbara B. S. v. S.Allen S., Allegheny Co., 876 Oct. 1977 (1982)].3:273-74.Going Concern Value as Distinguished fromGoodwill of Professional Practice is MaritalProperty. [Gaydos v. Gaydos, 143 P.L.J. 224(1995)]. Steven B. Schwartz. 18(2):9-11.Good Will has No Present Value for EquitableDistribution Purposes. [DeMasi v. DeMasi, 366Pa. Super. 19, 530 A.2d 871 (1987)]. 8:988-95.Goodwill in a Closely Held Corporation. [Ullomv. Ullom, 384 Pa. Super. 514, 559 A.2d555(1989)]. 10:90.Goodwill of Accounting Practice Subject <strong>to</strong>Equitable Distribution, Superior Court Rules.[Butler v. Butler, 423 Pa. Super. 530, 621 A.2d659 (1993)]. 14(3):4-6.Goodwill not Marital Property Subject <strong>to</strong>Equitable Distribution. [Beasley v. Beasley, 348Pa. Super. 124, 501 A.2d 679 (1985)]. 6:760-63.Goodwill Revisited–Dental Practice. [Fexa v.Fexa, 396 Pa. Super. 481, 578 A.2d 1314 (1990)].11:184.Goodwill Valuation of Veterinary Practice. [Bakerv. Baker, 861 A.2d 298 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. SallyR. Miller. 27:7-8.Grandmo<strong>the</strong>r Cus<strong>to</strong>dy not Enough in DependencyHearing Wheere It is a Sham. [In Re J.C., 5 A.3d284 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Christian V. Badali.<strong>32</strong>:189-90.Grandparent Visitation Statute Regarding Childrenof Separated or Divorced Parents is Constitutional,Does not Violate Equal Protection Rights.[Schmehl v. Schmehl, 927 A. 2d 183 (Pa. 2007)].Ann M. Funge.29:91-92.Grandparents Action for Visitation DismissedWhere Both Parents are Alive. [Herron v. Seizak,<strong>32</strong>1 Pa. Super. 466, 468 A.2d 803 (1983)]. 5:560-61.Grandparents have Au<strong>to</strong>matic Standing <strong>to</strong> BringCus<strong>to</strong>dy Actions. [R.M. v. Baxter ex rel T.M., 565Pa. 619, 777 A.2d 446 (2001)]. Teri L. Henning.23:59-60.Grandparents Visitation Act Interpreted. [Bishopv. Piller, 536 Pa. 41, 637 A.2d 976 (1994)].15(2):2-3.Grandparent's Visitation Rights. [Bishop v. Piller,399 Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]. 12(1):9-10.Gross Abuse of Discretion Standard ChildCus<strong>to</strong>dy Cases Re-Emphasized <strong>by</strong> Supreme Court.[Lombardo v. Lombardo, 515 Pa. 139, 527 A.2d525 (1987)]. 9:5.Grant of Counsel Fees for Continuing Conduct InCus<strong>to</strong>dy Case. [Holler v. Smith, 928 A.2d 330 (Pa.33
- Page 1 and 2: INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
- Page 5 and 6: Support-Guidelines ................
- Page 7: 13. Sidebar .......................
- Page 10 and 11: PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
- Page 12 and 13: 3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edit
- Page 14 and 15: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
- Page 16 and 17: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
- Page 18 and 19: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
- Page 20 and 21: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
- Page 22 and 23: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
- Page 24 and 25: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
- Page 26 and 27: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
- Page 28 and 29: 3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
- Page 30 and 31: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
- Page 32 and 33: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
- Page 34 and 35: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 36 and 37: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
- Page 38 and 39: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
- Page 40 and 41: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
- Page 44 and 45: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
- Page 46 and 47: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
- Page 48 and 49: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
- Page 50 and 51: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
- Page 52 and 53: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
- Page 54 and 55: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
- Page 56 and 57: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
- Page 58 and 59: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
- Page 60 and 61: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
- Page 62 and 63: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 64 and 65: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 66 and 67: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
- Page 68 and 69: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
- Page 70 and 71: C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
- Page 72 and 73: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
- Page 74 and 75: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
- Page 76 and 77: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
- Page 78 and 79: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
- Page 80 and 81: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
- Page 82 and 83: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
- Page 84 and 85: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
- Page 86 and 87: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
- Page 88 and 89: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 90 and 91: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
- Page 92 and 93:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
- Page 94 and 95:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
- Page 96 and 97:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 98 and 99:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
- Page 100 and 101:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
- Page 102 and 103:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
- Page 104 and 105:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
- Page 106 and 107:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
- Page 108 and 109:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
- Page 110 and 111:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
- Page 112 and 113:
Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
- Page 114 and 115:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
- Page 116 and 117:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
- Page 118 and 119:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
- Page 120 and 121:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
- Page 122 and 123:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
- Page 124 and 125:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
- Page 126 and 127:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
- Page 128 and 129:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
- Page 130 and 131:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
- Page 132 and 133:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
- Page 134 and 135:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
- Page 136 and 137:
Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
- Page 138 and 139:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
- Page 140 and 141:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
- Page 142 and 143:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLado
- Page 144 and 145:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
- Page 146 and 147:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
- Page 148 and 149:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
- Page 150 and 151:
5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
- Page 152 and 153:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
- Page 154 and 155:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
- Page 156 and 157:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
- Page 158 and 159:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETermi
- Page 160 and 161:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua
- Page 162 and 163:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
- Page 164 and 165:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQU
- Page 166 and 167:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
- Page 168 and 169:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
- Page 170 and 171:
6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
- Page 172 and 173:
Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
- Page 174 and 175:
Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
- Page 176 and 177:
12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
- Page 178 and 179:
Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
- Page 180:
Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up