12.07.2015 Views

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee <strong>to</strong> Liability for Post-Divorce HealthBenefits Paid when No Health InsurancePremiums Paid. [Trustees of <strong>the</strong> AFTRA HealththFund v. Biondi, 303 F.2d 765 (7 Cir. 2002)].David I. Grunfeld. 24:106.Failure <strong>to</strong> State Issues in Statement of MattersComplained of On Appeal Constitutes Waiver ofIssues First Raised <strong>by</strong> Appellant in Superior CourtBrief. [Kelly v. Mueller, 912 A.2d 202 (Pa. Super.2006)]. Michelle S. Dawson. 29:19-20.Failure <strong>to</strong> Transcribe In Camera Interview ofMinor Child not Fatal <strong>to</strong> Trial Court DecisionWhen Some Facts Were Elicited fromMultipleO<strong>the</strong>r Witnesses. [N.H.M. v. P.O.T., 947 A.2d1268 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Kim Denise Mor<strong>to</strong>n.30:152-54.Failure <strong>to</strong> Value a Marital Asset. [Ratarsky v.Ratarsky, 383 Pa. Super. 445, 557 A.2d 83(1989)]. 10:90-91.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Convicted of First Degree Murder andServing Life Term Entitled <strong>to</strong> Evaluation andTreatment <strong>to</strong> Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Case. [Cramer v. Zgela, 969A.2d. 621 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. Pamela L. Purdy.31:100-1.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Denied Visitation Rights WithIncapacitated 25-Year Old Daughter Pursuant <strong>to</strong>her Wishes. [Estate of Haertsch, Appeal of:Haertsch Sr., 415 Pa. Super. 598, 609 A.2d 1384(1994)]. 17(1):4.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Given Second Chance After Running Afoulof Children’s Fast-Track Rules, But Loses onAppeal. [J.M.R. v. J.M., 1 A.3d 902 (Pa. Super.2010)]. Andrew D. Taylor. <strong>32</strong>:191-92.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Imprisoned for His Child's Mo<strong>the</strong>r'sMurder is "Barred" from Visiting Child. [Green v.Sneeringer, 431 Pa. Super. 66, 635 A.2d 1074(1993)]. 15(1):13-14.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Ordered <strong>to</strong> Contribute Toward Tuition forPrivate School for Emotionally DisturbedDaughter. [Stredny v. Gray, 353 Pa. Super. 376,510 A.2d 359 (1986)]. 7:879-81.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Ordered <strong>to</strong> Pay More Than $200,000 inSupport Arrearages Dating Back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1950's.[Bullock v. Bullock, 4<strong>32</strong> Pa. Super. 643, 639 A.2d826 (1994)]. 15(3):9-10.Fa<strong>the</strong>r Whose Parental Rights Were Terminatedhad No Standing <strong>to</strong> Petition for Cus<strong>to</strong>dy. [Morganv. Weisner, 923 A.2d 1123 (Pa. Super. 2007)].Kim Denise Mor<strong>to</strong>n. 29:85-86.Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s Failure <strong>to</strong> Exercise Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Does notExcuse Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Failure <strong>to</strong> Follow Parties’Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Order. [Hopkins v. Byes, 954 A.2d 654(Pa. Super. 2008)]. Amy J. Phillips. 30:205-8.Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s Paternal Rights Terminated in Favor OfMaternal Grandfa<strong>the</strong>r.[In Re Adoption of J.M.,991 A.2d <strong>32</strong>1 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Gerald L.Shoemaker. <strong>32</strong>:79-80.Federal Law Held not <strong>to</strong> Preempt Provisions ofMarital Property Settlement Agreement. [Eonda v.Affini<strong>to</strong>, 427 Pa. Super. 317, 629 A.2d 119(1993)]. 14(5):6-8.A Finding of of Criminal Contempt is ImmediatelyAppealable. [Diamond v. Diamond, 715 A.2d1190 (Pa. Super. 1998)]. Charles J. Meyer. 20:90-92.First Impression: Bifurcation Under <strong>the</strong> AmendedDivorce Code. [Bonawits v. Bonawits, 907 A.2d611 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. Michael E. Bertin.29:98-100.Forfeiture of Marital Interest in Pension TooHarsh a Remedy for Failure <strong>to</strong> Satisfy Court’sQDRO Requirements. [Prol v. Prol, 935 A.2d 547(Pa. Super. 2007)]. Maris J. Weiner. 29:133-34.Foreign Guardianship Order not Entitled <strong>to</strong>Recognition in Pennsylvania. [Hilkmann v.Hilkmann, 858 A.2d 58 (Pa. 2004)]. Brian C.Vertz. 26:105-6.Forum Non Conveniens Analyzed in Adoption/Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Proceedings. [In Re:Adoption of K.S.,399 Pa. Super. 29, 581 A.2d 659 (1990)].12(1):10-12.<strong>32</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!