index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT(1993)]. 15(2):11-12.Lower Court Reversed for Failure to RelinquishJurisdiction Pursuant to UCCJEA: Remand forConsideration of §5422(B). [Billhime v. Billhime, 952A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Angelica L. Revelant.30:158.PA Child Custody Jurisdiction Lost Despite ParentRemaining in PA. [Billhime v. Billhime, 952 A.2d 1174(Pa. Super. 2008)]. Michael E. Bertin. 31:95-96.Parties Residency at Time of Filing Custody ComplaintGoverns Exercise of UCCJA Jurisdiction. [Simpkins v.Disney, 416 Pa. Super. 243, 610 A.2d 1062 (1992)].13(5):6-7.Recent UCCJA Decisions Should be Noted byPennsylvania Family Law Practitioners. [Wenz v.Schwartze, 598 P.2d 1086 (Mont. (1979), Cert. Den'd100 S.Ct. 1015 (1980); Zaubi v. Zaubi, Appeal ofHojme, 530 Pa. 831, 423 A.2d 333 (1980); Havice v.Havice, 15 D.&C.3d 450 (Snyder Co., 1980); J.C.S. v.D.M.S. and D.D., 227 Pa. Super. 612, 419 A.2d 1319(1980)]. 1:46-57.Recent UCCJA Decisions Should be Noted byPennsylvania Family Law Practitioners. [Warman v.Warman, 294 Pa. Super. 285, 439 A.2d 1203 (1982);Hattoum v. Hattoum, 295 Pa. Super. 169, 441 A. 2d403 (1982); Melzer v. Witsberger, 299 Pa. Super. 153,445 A.2d 499 3 (1982)]. 3:278-87.Superior Court Affirms Decision to Decline JurisdictionUnder UCCJEA After Full Custody Hearing WhereOne Parent Remains in Jurisdiction and UnderlyingCustody Order Ostensibly Retains Jurisdiction. [A.D. v.M.A.B., 989 A.2d 32 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Ann M.Funge. 32:68-70.DEPENDENCYCustody Action Filed While Juvenile Proceedings arePending is an Unwarranted Waste of JudicialResources. [P.T. & K.T. v. M.H., 953 A.2d 814 (Pa.Super. 2008)]. Elizabeth J. McCall. 31:6-7.Dependency by Omission: Trial Court’s Finding Thata Child is Without Proper Parental Care Supports anAdjudication of Dependency. [In Re: R.P., 2008 Pa.Super. 196 (August 21, 2008), 957 A.2d 1205 (Pa.Super. 2008)]. Christina M. DeMatteo. 30:213-15.Sexual Abuser Appeals Dependency Adjudication ofHis Paramour's Children. [In the Interest of :C.L., P.G.,Appeal of Pierson, 436 Pa. Super. 630, 648 A.2d 799(1994))]. 16(5):11-12.Superior Court Analyzes "Best Interests" and "ClearNecessity" Standards in Separating Dependant Childrenfrom Their Natural Parents. [In the Interests Of: S.S.;Appeal Of: Steven S. and Lori S., Natural Parents, 438Pa. Super. 62, 651 A.2d 174 (1994)]. 17(2):7-8.Unless a Child is Lacking Proper Parental Care andControl, He or She Cannot be Adjudicated Dependent.[In re Jeffrey S., Justin S. Jordon S. and Joy S., 427 Pa.Super. 79, 628 A.2d 439 (1993)]. 14(4):6-7.DISCOVERYCourts Imposes Sanctions for Failure to Comply WithDiscovery. [Scott v. Scott, 190 N. J. Super. 189, 462A.2d 614 (1983)]. 4:502-503.Discovery in Family Law Cases the Last of the PerryMason Courts. [Com. ex rel. Swank v. Swank, 266 Pa.Super. 94, 403 A. 2d 109 (1979); Drummond v.Drummond, Montg. Co., Equity 28, April Term 1960(1979); McCann v. McCann, 19 D.&C.3d 234 (ChesterCo. 1981); Roussos v. Roussos, 7 Family L. R. 2157(1981)]. 2:138-50.DIVORCEAncillary Appeals: Divorce Decree Reinstated. [Rosenv. Rosen, 520 Pa. 19, 549 A.2d 561 (1988)]. 9:44-45.Bill of Particulars does not Apply to No-Fault Divorce.[Jakstys v. Jakstys, 326 Pa. Super. 367, 474 A.2d 45(1984)]. 5:608-9.The Broad Discretion of the Court to EffectuateEconomic Justice Meant the Court Could Appoint anEquitable Distribution Master Within 30 Days of theFinal Decree Despite the Lack of a Properly RaisedClaim. [Lowers v. Lowers, 911 A.2d 553 (Pa. Super.2006)]. Kimberly Litzke. 29:12-13.Closure of Divorce Proceedings. [Katz v. Katz, 356 Pa.71