index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

3C. CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTABUSEFactors Relied on in Expunging Sexual Abuse Report.[J.S. v. Com., 528 Pa. 243, 596 A.2d 1114 (1991)].12(6):4-5.Local Child Welfare Agency is Given Sixty Days toInvestigate Abuse Complaint Once Accused Abuser isIdentified. [Cumberland County Children & YouthServices v. Department of Public Welfare,148 Pa.Cmwlth. 479, 611 A.2d 1339 (1992)]. 13(4):13-15.Mother's Boyfriend Lacked Standing to ChallengeFinding Implicating Him to Child Abuse. [In theInterest of Garthwaite, 422 Pa. Super. 280, 619 A.2d356 (1993)]. 14(3):7-8.Pennsylvania Supreme Court Examines Due ProcessRights of Accused Child Abuser. [R. v. Com.,Department of Public Welfare and Montgomery CountyOffice of Children and Youth, 535 Pa. 440, 636 A.2d142 (1994)]. 15(3):11-17.Perpetrator of Child Abuse: Omissions are Enough.[K.S. v. Com.of Pa., Dept. of Public Welfare, 129 Pa.Cmwlth. 31, 564 A.2d 561 (1989)]. 10:125-26.The Superior Court Analyzes the Interplay Between theChild Protective Services Law and the Juvenile Act. [Inthe Interest Of: J.R.W., Appeal of: V.F., NaturalMother, Appeal of A.W., Natural Father, 428 Pa.Super. 597, 631 A.2d 1019 (1993)]. 15(1):11-13.ADOPTIONAppealability of CYS' Adoption Goal. [In Re: In theInterest of M.B., K.B., J.B., L.B., 388 Pa. Super. 381,565 A.2d 804 (1989)]. 11:135-36.Commonwealth Court Upholds GovernmentalImmunity Defense in Case Against CYS forMisrepresentation of Adopted Child's Health andBackground. [Zernhelt v. Lehigh County Office ofCYS, 659 A.2d 89 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995)]. 17(4):3-4.Court Sets Forth Charges Permitted as Part of AdoptionProceedings. [In Re: Baby Girl D., 512 Pa. 449, 517A.2d 925 (1986)]. 8:946-950Eight Years' Failure to Cooperate with Agency Resultsin Termination of Parental Rights. [In Re: Adoption ofSteven S., 417 Pa. Super. 247, 612 A.2d 465 (1992)].13(4):11-13.Father’s Paternal Rights Terminated in Favor ofMaternal Grandfather. [In Re Adoption of J.M., 991A.2d 321 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Gerald L. Shoemaker.32:79-80.Foster Parents may not Adopt Over CYS Objection:Superior Court Refuses to Extend Supreme Court'sDecision In Re: Adoption of Hess to Foster Parents.[Chester County Children and Youth Services v.Cunningham, 457 Pa. 525, 326 A.2d 377 (1994)].15(2):7-8.Homosexual Partners are not Spouses Qualified UnderPa. Adoption Act. [In re: Adoption of R. B. F. and R.C. F., 762 A.2d 739 (Pa. Super. 2000)] and. [In re:Adoption of C. C. G. and Z. C. G. 762 A.2d 724 (Pa.Super. 2000)]. Stanley J. Margle. 23:8-9.Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights: CourtAdopts "Clear and Convincing Evidence" Standard.[Petition for Involuntary Termination of ParentalRights, Appeal of G.J.A, 304 Pa. Super. 21, 450 A.2d80 (1982)]. 3:361-362.Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights–Father'sAttempt to Overcome. [In Re: Baby Boy H., 401 Pa.Super. 530, 585 A.2d 1054 (1991)]. 12(3):10-11.Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights DeniedWhen Natural Parent Maintains Substantial andContinuing Contact Prior to the Filed Petition, SuperiorCourt Declares. [T.J.B. v. E.C., 438 Pa. Super. 529,652 A.2d 936 (1995); In Re: Adoption of M.J.C., 438Pa. Super. 529, 652 A.2d 936 (1995)]. 17(2):9-12.Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of ParentsUnable or Unwilling to Fulfill CYS Conditions forImproving Parenting Skills. [In re: J.E., a minor andE.E., a minor, 745 A.2d 1250 (Pa. Super. 2000)].Colleen M. Neary. 22:34-36.Limited Testimony of Social Worker Allowed OverMother’s Objection. [In the Matter of L.F., Appeal ofL.W., 995 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Amy J.61