index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDIVORCE–FOREIGN DECREEEnforcement of Foreign Decree in Pennsylvania.[Kramer v. Kramer, 21 D.&C.3d 94 (Lehigh, 1981)].3:323-24.Husband Estopped from Asserting Invalidity of ForeignDivorce Decree. [Lowenschuss v. Lowenschuss, 396Pa. Super. 531, 579 A.2d 377 (1990)]. Emanuel A.Bertin. 11:154-55.Jurisdiction of Pennsylvania Courts Extended OverNon-Resident Defendants. [Messa v. Messa, 110Montg. Co. L. Rep. 192 (1981)]. 3:327-31.Section 505 Applies Only to Foreign ex Parte Divorces.[Sohmer v. Sohmer, 318 Pa. Super. 500, 465 A.2d 665(1983)]. 4:465-66.State Court has Jurisdiction Over Non-Resident Alienin Divorce Action. [Sinha v. Sinha, 341 Pa. Super. 440,491 A.2d 1399 (1985)]. 6:764-67.Superior Court Approves Entry of Alimony OrderBased on Pennsylvania Agreement, Many YearsFollowing Final Divorce Decree in a Jurisdiction notPermitting Alimony. [Polito v. Polito, 440 Pa. Super.328, 655 A.2d 587 (1995)]. 17(3):7.DIVORCE–GROUNDS201(d) Divorce–Separation Must be Related to MaritalDiscord. [Spitzkopf v. Spitzkopf, 3 A.C.D.D. 42(1982)]. 3:337-38.Defendants are not Required to Execute §201(c)Affidavit of Consents Against Will. [Hulek v. Hulek, 6A.C.D.D. 294 (1984)]. 6:699.Given a Conflict Between a Fault and No-Fault Ground,No-Fault Will Prevail. [Barbara B. S. v. S. Allen S.,Allegh. Co., 876 Oct. 1977 (1982)]. 3:273-74 .Heart Balm Act Held Inapplicable to Causes of Actionfor Fraud and Negligent Representation, Arising out ofa Bigamous Marriage. [Lampus v. Lampus, 541 Pa. 67,660 A.2d 1308 (1995)]. 17(5):6.The "I's" Have It: Infidelity, Insufficient to Invalidate,Indignities to the "Injured and Innocent". [Schuback v.Schuback, 412 Pa. Super. 233, 603 A.2d 194 (1992)].13(3):6-7.The Meaning of the 1988 Divorce Code AmendmentsClarified. [Woodings v. Woodings, 411 Pa. Super. 406,601 A.2d 854 (1992)]. Emanuel A. Bertin. 13(1):2.Section 201(d) Divorce–Court Need not Give PartyNotice Before Entering Divorce Decree. [Kopf v. Kopf,2 A.C.D.D. 87(1982)]. 3:322-23.The Test for Innocent and Injured Spouse. [Hunsingerv. Hunsinger, 381 Pa. Super. 453, 554 A.2d 89 (1989)].10(2):81-82.DIVORCE–INJUNCTIVE RELIEFCase Law on the Availability of Injunctive Relief Underthe New Divorce Code. [Holub v. Holub, 1 A.C.D.D.31 (Allegh. Co., 1981)]. 2:172-76.Injunctive Relief Under Section 401(c) of the DivorceCod. [Lazovitz v. Lazovitz, 307 Pa. Super. 341, 453A.2d 615 (1982)]. 4:391-93.DIVORCE–MARITAL PROPERTYBonds Purchased with Proceeds from Sale of GiftBecome Marital Property When Placed in Joint Names.[Madden v. Madden, 336 Pa. Super. 552, 486 A.2d 951(1984) 6:673-75.Constructive Trust May Attach to Non-DisclosedMarital Assets Regardless of Withholder's Intent.[Creeks v. Creeks, 422 Pa. Super. 432, 619 A.2d 754(1993)]. 14(3):8-9.Court Creates Constructive Trust. [Brasile v. Estate ofLouis Brasile, 354 Pa. Super. 400, 512 A.2d 10(1986)]. 7:877-78.Court Finds Mortgage Payments Together WithResulting Appreciation on Pre-Owned Property isMarital. [Ball v. Ball, 5 A.C.D.D. 174 (1983)]. 4:512-14.Division of Marital Property: Factors Considered.[Powell v. Powell, 395 Pa. Super. 345, 577 A.2d 576(1990)]. 11:171-73.77