index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT(1990)]. 11:173-74.Child Support Where Father was Sperm Donor andDetermined to be an Indispensable Party in Mother’sAction to Obtain Child Support from Former Same-SexPartner. [Jacob v. Shultz-Jacob-Jacob & Frampton, 923A.2d 473 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Christian V. Badali.29:48-49.Clarification for Those Pre-1988 Support Agreements.[Nicholson v. Combs, 550 Pa. 23, 703 A.2d 407(1997). Lorraine W. Mervan. 20:3.Court Establishes Formula for Child Support. [Melzerv. Witsberger, 505 Pa. 462, 480 A.2d 991 (1984)].5:588-91.Courts may not Divide Social Security Benefits inSupport. [Silver v. Pinskey, not reported in A.2d, 2008WL 902715 (Pa. Super. April 4, 2008), rearg. En bancgranted May 30, 2008]. Natalie Famous. 30:86-87.Daughter's Needs Outweigh Dinners Out. [Opie v.Richart, 410 Pa. Super. 380, 599 A.2d 1348 (1991)].13(1):7.Deceased Parent's Estate not Required to Pay ChildSupport, Superior Court Rules. [Garney v. Estate ofHain, 439 Pa. Super. 42, 653 A.2d 21 (1995)]. 17(2):2-3.Denial of Child Support as a Result of the Doctrine ofJudicial Immunity. [Clodgo v. Bowman, 411 Pa. Super.267, 601 A.2d 342 (1992)]. 13(2):6-7.Direct Payment to Public Assistance Recipient of ChildSupport Arrearages Gets No Credit from DPW,Commonwealth Court Rules. [Long v. Thomas, 152 Pa.Cmwlth. 416, 619 A.2d 394 (1992)]. 14(1):8.Directly or Indirectly, Parents Cannot Avoid SupportObligations by Contract. [Miesen v. Frank, 361 Pa.Super. 204, 522 A.2d 85 (1987)]. 9:7-8.Does the Nurturing Parent Doctrine Still Exist inPennsylvania? [Doherty v. Doherty, 859 A.2d 811 (Pa.Super. 2004)]. Caren E. Morrissey. 26:107-8.Domestic Relations Subpoena Approved For Use atSupport Hearing. [Knight v. Northwest savings Bank,et al., 747 A.2d 384 (Pa. Super. 2000)]. Jeffrey M.Williams. 22:38.Earning Capacity and Nurturing Parent Doctrine inSupport Cases. [Kelly v. Kelly, (1993)]. 14(5):3-4.Effectiveness of Varying State Child Support OrdersEvaluated. [Com. ex rel. Brendel v. Brendel, 429 Pa.Super. 319, 632 A.2d 876 (1993)]. 15(1):9-10.Emancipated Child May Intervene in EnforcementProceedings to Litigate and Receive Retroactive ChildSupport. [Chen v. Chen, 840 A.2d 355 (Pa. Super.2003)]. Jennifer A. Brandt. 26:5-6."Entitlement" Still an Issue in Spousal Support Cases.[Myers v. Myers, 405 Pa. Super. 290, 592 A.2d 339(1991)]. 12(5):3-4.Equal Amenities at Both Parents’ Houses not theStandard for Child Support in High Income Cases inPennsylvania. [Rich v. Rich, 967 A.2d 400 (Pa. Super.2009)]. Melissa M. Boyd. 31:18-19.Explanatory Comments to Revised Rule 1910.19(f)Prevent Arrears to be Remitted During Obligor’sIncarceration. [Nash v. Herbster, 932 A.2d 183 (Pa.Super. 2007)]. Linda A. Kerns. 29:125-26.Father Ordered to Pay More than $200,000 in SupportArrearages Dating Back to the 1950's. [Bullock v.Bullock, 432 Pa. Super. 643, 639 A.2d 826 (1994)].15(3):9-10.Getting Sirious.[Sirio v. Sirio, 951 A.2d 1188 (Pa.Super. 2008)]. David J. Draganosky. 30:159-63.If Adult Child's Handicap Prevents Independent Living,Parent's Support Obligation Continues. [Hanson v.Hanson, 425 Pa. Super. 508, 625 A.2d 1212 (1993)].14(4):14-15.Imprisonment and Child Support Payment. [Leasure v.Leasure, 378 Pa. Super. 613, 549 A.2d 225 (1988)].9:50.Imputed Income fromSecond Full-Time Job in SupportCases. [Haselrig v. Haselrig, 840 A.2d 338 (Pa. Super.2003)]. Sandra E. Davis. 26:8-9.93