ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLadov, David L.* and Michele Garrigan-Nass.Ano<strong>the</strong>r Piece of <strong>the</strong> Marital Pie: S<strong>to</strong>ckOptions. 9:52-53.Ladov, David L. Divorce–Israeli Style. 29:102-3.Ladov, David L.* & Kenneth Spiegel. Parentshave a Constitutional Right <strong>to</strong> Inculcate TheirReligious Beliefs upon Their Children. 11:167-168.Ladov, David L.* and Kenneth Spiegel. ValuingMarital Assets After Sutliff. 11:148.Landy, Joni. Compliance Dates Approaching onThree More Laws Affecting Group Health Plans.31:59-62.Lang, Brian R. Which Businesses Qualify for <strong>the</strong>Valuable New Tax Break? <strong>32</strong>:164-66.Lear, Richard E., Diane N. Rallis, and John J.Monaghan*. Ponzi Schemes and Clawbacks:Inves<strong>to</strong>rs Pay Twice for <strong>the</strong> Crime of O<strong>the</strong>rs.31:121-28.Leichter, Alexandra. The Effect of Islamic FamilyLaw on North American Family Law Issues.<strong>32</strong>:41-52.Leichter, Alexandra. The Effect of Jewish DivorceLaw on Family Law Litigation. <strong>32</strong>:90-97.Leichter, Alexandra. Issues and SolutionsRegarding Jewish Premarital Agreements. <strong>32</strong>:152-59.Levandowski, Mike and Dennis McGee.*Guideline Triple X. 22:42-43.Levine, Dana A.* and Brian C. Vertz. Analysis ofa Support Case. <strong>32</strong>:29-34.Levine, Dana A. Public Access <strong>to</strong> PrivateInformation on Online Dockets: A BalanceBetween Freedom of Access <strong>to</strong> Information andProtecting <strong>the</strong> Privacy of Clients. 27:128-29.Levitske, John and Nina Vitek.* S<strong>to</strong>ck Optionsand Post-Retirement Maintenance PaymentsAccording <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wisconsin Court of Appeals.<strong>32</strong>:106-7.Lillie, Debra K., Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. McFadden,*, JudithA. Bretz, and Susan J. Beckert. EquitableDistribution: Mixed Assets. 19:13-14.Long, Brenden D. Prenuptial Agreement is notVoidable Under <strong>the</strong> Theory of FraudulentMisrepresentation as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Value of Assets Unless<strong>the</strong> Party Attacking <strong>the</strong> Agreement ProvesJustifiable Reliance on <strong>the</strong> Misrepresentation:Porreco v. Porreco. 26:58-67.Lovewell, Mat<strong>the</strong>w B. Divorce, Refinance, &Title: Acquiring New Income. <strong>32</strong>:104-5.Luccino, F. J. Up<strong>to</strong>wn Legal Clinic. 27:16-17.Lunney, Brian G. and Les Barenbaum*. Views onFisher v. Fisher, 769 A.2d 1165 (Pa. 2001)–S<strong>to</strong>ckOptions. 23:74-76.Mahood, James E. Do Common Pleas Courts haveConstitutional Authority <strong>to</strong> Prescribe <strong>by</strong> GeneralOrder or Local Rule Seminars or Counseling forParents Involved in Divorce? 20:70-73.Mahood, James E. Early Retirement Incentives arenot Deferred Compensation. 20:18-20.Mahood, James E. Reading Between <strong>the</strong> Lines:The Supreme Court's Decision in Gordon v.Gordon. 18(4):12-14.Mahood, James E. Relocation Orders areImmediately Appealable. 20:99-100.Mahood, James E. Some Reflections on SocialSecurity Offsets: Cornbleth <strong>to</strong> McClain <strong>to</strong>Cohenour. 19:58-60.Majumder, Mary Anderlik. Genetic Ties and <strong>the</strong>Future of <strong>the</strong> Family. 25:78-80.Markovitz, Robert S.* and Timothy A. Taylor.What is <strong>the</strong> Definition of Cash Flow Available forSupport and What is Support? 23:67-68.1<strong>32</strong>
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMcCaffrey, Joseph and G. Daniel Jones.* CapitalGain & “Principal Residence” Capital GainChange–Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. 20:20-22.McCullough, Kevin C. and David N. Hofstein.*Contingent Fees in Domestic Relations Matters.9:37-39.McCurdy, Dennis W. Terminating <strong>the</strong> ParentalRights of <strong>the</strong> Incarcerated Parent: Clarity andGuidance from<strong>the</strong> Superior Court. 27:13-15.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Age and Alimony.17(2):13-15.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. ALI Principles Suggesta New Approach <strong>to</strong> Separate Property. 18(3):12-16.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Colonna Considered.26:49-50.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Don't Let Your ClientShoot Himself in <strong>the</strong> Foot. 12(5):9-11.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Dramatic ChangesProposed in Child Support Guidelines. 26:11-19.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M.,* Judith A. Bretz, SusanJ. Beckert and Debra K. Lillie. EquitableDistribution: Mixed Assets. 19:13-14.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. How Costs of Childrenare Calculated. 26:19-23.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine S. Millick v. Millick: A Spur<strong>to</strong> Pension Reform, not a Reason for Applause.12(5):14-15.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine. Pension Valuation Issues.11:189-91.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Retirement AgeArguments. 12(3):11-14.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Speculative or Not,Indefinite Tax Ramifications Must be Considered.<strong>32</strong>:196-200.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Standard of Practice forPension Valuation Adoption. 22:44-46.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Stay Now, Pay Later.14(1):10-11.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Study of PA SCDUReveals Problems and Peculiarities. 22:65-69.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. There is No Such Thingas an Accrued Benefit (Or Why CovertureFractions Make Sense). 12(3):14-16.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. U.S. Supreme CourtIdentifies Pension Issues: Kennedy & ProgenyPost-Decision Guidance. 31:107-10.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Valuing and DistributingIncreases and Decreases. 15(2):13-15.McGee, Dennis* and Mike Levandowski.Guideline Triple X. 22:42-43.McSorley, Anne* and Geoff Anders. MedicalPractice Valuation: Why and How. 9:59-60.Meck, John F. Estate Planning and <strong>the</strong> Tax Act of2001—What <strong>to</strong> do in 2002. 24:18-20.Mezzy, Gary. Is APL Au<strong>to</strong>matic? 27:90-91.Michaelson, Sarinia A. and Kathleen B. Vetrano*New QDRO Costs <strong>to</strong> be Fac<strong>to</strong>red in DivorcePractice Pointer. 27:12-13.Montella, Susan M. The “Computer Service Fee”Charged <strong>by</strong> Philadelphia Domestic RelationsDeters Established of Child Support. 25:13-14.Mroz, Kelly A. Paternity <strong>by</strong> Es<strong>to</strong>ppel and Fraud.25:81-82.Midkiff, David W. Considering Divorce: ShouldYou Leave <strong>the</strong> Marital Residence? 13(6):12-13.Miles, Patricia A. Howett Appoints DiscoveryTask Force. 18(1):8-9.Miller, Patricia G. A Conversation With My Cat133
- Page 1 and 2:
INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
- Page 5 and 6:
Support-Guidelines ................
- Page 7:
13. Sidebar .......................
- Page 10 and 11:
PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
- Page 12 and 13:
3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edit
- Page 14 and 15:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
- Page 16 and 17:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
- Page 18 and 19:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
- Page 20 and 21:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
- Page 22 and 23:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
- Page 24 and 25:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
- Page 26 and 27:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
- Page 28 and 29:
3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
- Page 30 and 31:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
- Page 32 and 33:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
- Page 34 and 35:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 36 and 37:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
- Page 38 and 39:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
- Page 40 and 41:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
- Page 42 and 43:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee to Li
- Page 44 and 45:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
- Page 46 and 47:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
- Page 48 and 49:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
- Page 50 and 51:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
- Page 52 and 53:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
- Page 54 and 55:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
- Page 56 and 57:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
- Page 58 and 59:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
- Page 60 and 61:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
- Page 62 and 63:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 64 and 65:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 66 and 67:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
- Page 68 and 69:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
- Page 70 and 71:
C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
- Page 72 and 73:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
- Page 74 and 75:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
- Page 76 and 77:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
- Page 78 and 79:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
- Page 80 and 81:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
- Page 82 and 83:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
- Page 84 and 85:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
- Page 86 and 87:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
- Page 88 and 89:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 90 and 91:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
- Page 92 and 93: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
- Page 94 and 95: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
- Page 96 and 97: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 98 and 99: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
- Page 100 and 101: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
- Page 102 and 103: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
- Page 104 and 105: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
- Page 106 and 107: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
- Page 108 and 109: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
- Page 110 and 111: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
- Page 112 and 113: Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
- Page 114 and 115: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
- Page 116 and 117: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
- Page 118 and 119: TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
- Page 120 and 121: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
- Page 122 and 123: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
- Page 124 and 125: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
- Page 126 and 127: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
- Page 128 and 129: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
- Page 130 and 131: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
- Page 132 and 133: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
- Page 134 and 135: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
- Page 136 and 137: Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
- Page 138 and 139: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
- Page 140 and 141: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
- Page 144 and 145: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
- Page 146 and 147: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
- Page 148 and 149: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
- Page 150 and 151: 5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
- Page 152 and 153: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
- Page 154 and 155: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
- Page 156 and 157: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
- Page 158 and 159: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETermi
- Page 160 and 161: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua
- Page 162 and 163: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
- Page 164 and 165: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQU
- Page 166 and 167: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
- Page 168 and 169: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
- Page 170 and 171: 6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
- Page 172 and 173: Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
- Page 174 and 175: Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
- Page 176 and 177: 12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
- Page 178 and 179: Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
- Page 180: Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up