index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography Internet Sites. [A.J.B. v. M.P.B., 945 A.2d744 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Erin Farabaugh. 30:88-90.Supreme Court Admits Parole Evidence to Define theTerm of Cohabitation in a Property SettlementAgreement. [Kripp v. Kripp, 849 A.2d 1159 (Pa.2004)]. Carolyn R. Mirabile. 26:41-42.The Tender Years Hearsay Act. [Fidler v. Cunningham-Small, 871 A.2d 231 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. Joseph P.Martone. 27:56-57.Test for Hearsay Evidence in Sexual Abuse Cases.[G.W.K. v. Com. of Pa., Dept. of Welfare, 125 Pa.Cmwlth. 512, 558 A.2d 151 (1989)]. 10(4):105-6.GRANDPARENTSAnalysis of Grandparent Visitation Rights. [Johnson v.Diesinger, 404 Pa. Super. 41, 589 A.2d 1160 (1991)].12(4):8-9." Domino Effect" of Grandparent's Visits on Mother'sDepression and Her Treatment of Child Bars Themfrom Visitation. [Norris v. Tearney, 422 Pa. Super. 246,619 A.2d 339 (1993)]. 14(3):12-13.Grandparents Action for Visitation Dismissed WhereBoth Parents are Alive. [Herron v. Seizak, 321 Pa.Super. 466, 468 A.2d 803 (1983)]. 5:560-61.Grandparent's Visitation Rights. [Bishop v. Piller, 399Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]. 12(1):9-10.Grandparents Visitation Act Interpreted. [Bishop v.Piller, 536 Pa. 41, 637 A.2d 976 (1994)]. 15(2):2-3.Mother of Custodial Parent has Standing to SeekVisitation of Grandchild in New Interpretation ofGrandparents' Visitation Act. [Hill v. Divecchio, 425Pa. Super. 355, 625 A.2d 642 (1993)]. 14(3):10-11.Supreme Court Gives Grandparents Equal Right toAdopt Grandchildren. [Adoption of Hess, 530 Pa. 218,608 A.2d 10 (1992)]. 13(3):3-5.GUARDIANSHIPForeign Guardianship Order not Entitled to Recognitionin Pennsylvania. [Hilkmann v. Hilkmann, 858 A.2d 58(Pa. 2004)]. Brian C. Vertz. 26:105-6.INCOMPETENCYAffirmative Showing Required to Have Adult ChildDeclared Incompetent. [In re Estate of Haertsch v.Haertsch, 415 Pa. Super. 598, 609 A.2d 1384 (1992)].13(4):9-10.INEFFECTIVE COUNSELIneffectiveness of Counsel: Dependency Hearing. [Inthe Matter of Price, 393 Pa. Super. 1, 573 A.2d 1057(1990)]. 11:146-47.LEGAL MALPRACTICESuperior Court En Banc Overrules Miller v. Berschler,and Limits Immunity from Malpractice of AttorneysCounseling Settlement Agreements. [McMahon v.Shea, 441 Pa. Super. 304, 657 A.2d 938 (1995)].17(3):2.Supreme Court Allows Legal Malpractice Claim WhereSettlement was Entered in Divorce. [McMahon v. Shea,547 Pa. 124, 688 A.2d 1179 (1997)]. Robb B. Bunde.19:33-34.MAILBOX RULEMailbox Rule Applied to Domestic Relation HearingNotices. [Murphy v. Murphy, 988 A.2d 703 (Pa. Super.2010)]. Elizabeth J. McCall. 32:70-71.NAME CHANGESName Change of Child. [In Re: Richie by Boehm, 387Pa. Super. 401, 564 A.2d 239 (1989)]. 10(4):111.Standard for Name Change. In Re: Grimes, 530 Pa.388, 609 A.2d 158 1992)]. 13(4):4.PALIMONYCourt Addresses Issue of Palimony Actions. [Knauer v.Knauer, Jr., 323 Pa. Super. 206, 470 A.2d 553 (1984)].5:530-36.Palimony in Pennsylvania? [Harz v. Stauffer, MonroeCo. 1313 Civil 1981 (1982)]. 3:368.88