12.07.2015 Views

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Parentis Status Provides Same Rights as aParent in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings. [In re D.K.& W.K., 922 A.2d 929 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Sarinia A.Michaelson. 29:100-01.Indemnification Provision for Child Support Liabilityis Unenforceable and Against Public Policy. [Frank v.Miesen, 361 Pa. Super. 204, 522 A.2d 85]. 8:957-58.Inheritance does not Equate <strong>to</strong> Income for SupportPurposes. [Humphries v. DeRoss, 790 A.2d 281 (Pa.2002)]. Elisabeth Pride. 24:<strong>32</strong>-34.Interlocu<strong>to</strong>ry Order for APL/Spousal Support isUnappealable Within 30 Days of <strong>the</strong> Entry of <strong>the</strong> FinalDecree in Divorce or Annulment. [Costlow v. Costlow,914 A.2d 440 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. Jennifer A. Brandt.29:14-15.Is There an Obligation for Support Arrearages WhenParental Rights have been Terminated? [MonroeCounty Children and Youth Services v. Werkheiser,409 Pa. Super. 508, 598 A.2d 313 (1991)]. 13(1):8.Judgment Stricken on Lump Sum Certification ofSupport Arrears. [Welz v. Stump, 403 Pa. Super. 93,588 A.2d 47 (1991)]. 12(3):8-9.Kerns, Linda A. Explana<strong>to</strong>ry Comments <strong>to</strong> RevisedRule 1910.19(f) Prevent Arrears <strong>to</strong> be Remitted DuringObligor’s Incarceration. [Nash v. Herbster, 9<strong>32</strong> A.2d183 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. 29:125-26.Laches–Collection of Support Arrearages. [Patten v.Vose, 404 Pa. Super. 426, 590 A.2d 1307 (1991)].12(4):10-11.Lump Sum Personal Injury Settlement ConstitutesIncome for Support Calculations. [Dar<strong>by</strong> v. Dar<strong>by</strong>, 455Pa. Super. 63, 686 A.2d 1346 (1996)]. James H.Richardson. 19:29-31.Minimum Contacts Established in Support Action.[Baronti v. Baronti, 381 Pa. Super. 134, 552 A.2d 1131(1989)]. 10:64.Mortgage Adjustment in Child Support Case AfterDecree in Divorce. [Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178(Pa Super. 2003)]. Sandra E. Davis. 25:69-72.Nei<strong>the</strong>r IVF, Nor a Preconception Oral Agreement Nor<strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Intentional Deception Bars a SpermDonor’s Adjudication as <strong>the</strong> Child’s Legal Fa<strong>the</strong>rObligated <strong>to</strong> Pay Child Support. [Ferguson v.McKiernan, 855 A.2d 121 (Pa Super. 2004)]. CharlesS. Cusick, Jr. 26:109-10.No Child Support Duty after Death. [Benson ex rel.Patterson v. Patterson, 830 A.2d 966 (Pa 2003)]. LoriK. Shem<strong>to</strong>b. 25:95-96.No Child Support Obligation When Child VoluntarilyLeaves Home. [Oeler v. Oeler, 527 Pa. Super. 5<strong>32</strong>, 594A.2d 649 (1991)]. 12(4):11-12.No Income Imputed <strong>to</strong> "Stay-at-home" Parent ofChronically Ill Toddler. [Single<strong>to</strong>n v. Waites, 420 Pa.Super. 184, 616 A.2d 644 (1992)]. 13(6):9-10.No Modification of Support When Reasons not on <strong>the</strong>Record. [Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 412 Pa. Super. 382,603 A.2d 633 (1992)]. 13(2):5-6.A Noncus<strong>to</strong>dial Parent is Obliged <strong>to</strong> Pay Child SupportUntil a Child Reaches Age 18 or GraduatesfromHighSchool, Whichever Occurs Later in Time. [Robinson-Austin v. Robinson-Austin, 921 A.2d 1246 (Pa. Super.2007)]. Gerald L. Shoemaker, Jr. 29:55.Notes of O<strong>the</strong>r Support Cases. Support–Arrearages.Com. ex rel. Belin v. Belin, 268 Pa. Super. 428, 408A.2d 862 (1979); Com. ex rel. Cragle v. Cragle, Pa.Super., 419 A. 2d 1179 (1980)]. 1:58-59.Obligation <strong>to</strong> Support Child of Second MarriageConstitutes a Change in Circumstance.[Fortune/Forsy<strong>the</strong> v. Fortune, 352 Pa. Super. 547, 508A.2d 1205 (1986)]. 7:861-63.Orders Granting Interim Relief are Interlocu<strong>to</strong>ry. [Friedv. Fried, 509 Pa. 89, 501 A.2d 211 (1985)]. 6:772-75.Pa.R.A.P. 1701: An Analysis. [Schoff v. Richter, 386Pa. Super. 289, 562 A.2d 912 (1989)]. 10(4):115.Panel Postpones Re-examination of Welfare ChildSupport Relationship. [Com., Dept. of Public Welfareex rel. Dessus v. Chamberlain, 421 Pa. Super. 137, 617A.2d 762 (1992)]. 14(1):9-10.94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!