index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized Appeal Results in Ruling that Parent withDe Jure, But not De Facto, Custody has Standing toSeek Child Support. [Seder v. Seder, 841 A.2d 1074(Pa. Super. 2004)]. Ann M. Funge. 26:9-11.Value of Employee Benefits Package and UndistributedAnnuity Interest Must be Included as Income Availablefor Child Support Purposes. [Arbet v. Arbet, 803 A.2d34 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. Darren J. Holst. 27:4-7.Wife's Settlement to Spousal Support When SheVacates the Home. [Rock v. Rock, 385 Pa. Super. 126,560 A.2d 199 (1989)]. 10:93.Wife's Waiver of Child Support Determined to beInvalid Because Payments Were Equitable Distributionand not Child Support. [Kraisinger V. Kraisinger, 928A.2d 333 (Pa. Super 2007)]. Michael Viola. 29:93-95.SUPPORT–EDUCATIONAct 62 is Applied Retroactively, the Superior CourtDeclares. [Hecker v. O'connell, 427 Pa. Super. 608,629 A.2d 1036 (1993)]. 14(4):2.Agreement to Pay Post-Secondary EducationalExpenses is Valid & Binding. [Goss v. Timblin, 424Pa. Super. 216, 622 A.2d 347 (1993)]. 14(3):3-4.A Brief History of the Law of College Support inPennsylvania. [Colantoni v. Colantoni, 220 Pa. Super.46, 281 A. 2d 662 (1971); Grallnick v. Grallnick, 279Pa. Super. 347, 421 A.2d 232 (1980); Ross v. Ross,167 N. J. Super. 441, 400 A. 2d 1233 (1979)]. 1:62-64.College Education: A Basic Necessity. [Milne v. Milne,383 Pa. Super. 177, 556 A.2d 854 (1987)]. 9:3-4.College Education: Estrangement. [In the Matter ofFager v. Fatta, 395 Pa. Super. 152, 576 A.2d 1089(1990)]. 11:174-75.College Expenses: Father's Obligation. [Schumacker v.Hanna, 377 Pa. Super. 301, 547 A.2d 379 (1988)].9:49.College Support Allowed for Children Over 23 andChildren Who Have Become Parents. [Griffin v.Griffin, 384 Pa. Super. 210, 558 A.2d 86 (1988)]. 9:36-37.College Support Award. [Monsky v. Sacks, 403 Pa.Super. 40, 588 A.2d 19 (1990)]. 12(1):3-4.College Support: Estrangement and Undue Hardship.[Bedford v. Bedford, 386 Pa. Super. 349, 563 A.2d 102(1989)]. 10(4):101.College Support: Need and Undue Hardship. [Chesonisv. Chesonis, 372 Pa. Super. 113, 538 A.2d 1376(1988)]. 9(2):13.College Support Ordered Since No Funding of WillfulEstrangements, Superior Court Declares. [McGettiganv. McGettigan, 433 Pa. Super. 102, 639 A.2d 1231(1994)]. 15(2):4-5.College Support Takes Backseat to Minor Child'sSupport. [Horst v. Horst, 406 Pa. Super. 188, 593 A.2d1299 (1991)]. 12(4):11.College Support–Weighing All Factors. [Pharoah v.Lapes, 391 Pa. Super. 585, 571 A.2d 1070 (1990)].11:143-44.Court Finds Child has a Right to be Supported inVocational School. [Maurer v. Maurer, 382 Pa. Super.468, 555 A.2d 1294 (1989)]. 10(2):77-78.Court Finds Father Obligated to Support Son AttendingLaw School. [Brown v. Brown, 8 A.C.D.D. 199(1983)]. 4:438-39.Court Finds No Obligation to Support EmancipatedChild in Professional School. [Brown v. Brown, 327Pa. Super. 51, 474 A.2d 1168 (1984)]. 5:581-82.Current Standard of Living and Child’s NeedsControlling in Private School Tuition Case WhereChild did not Attend Private School Prior to Separation.[Gibbons v. Kugle, 908 A.2d 916 (Pa. Super. 2006)].Al Shemtob. 29:9.Death, Depression, Delays Expand College SupportObligation. [McCabe v. Krupinski, 413 Pa. Super. 59,604 A.2d 732(1992)]. 13(3):5-6.Educational Support Case Remanded, Where TrialCourt Incorrectly Considered Items Such as PersonalExpenses, Clothing and Travel Expenses, and WhereCourt Proceeded in the Absence of a Critical Child98