index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Donna M. The Mature Minor DoctrineNo Defense to Involuntary Manslaughter of Childnot Provided Medical Treatment. [Com. v. Nixon,563 Pa. 425, 761 A.2d 1151 (2000)]. 23:11-13.McKillop, Donna Trial Court may not InfusePersonal Beliefs Opposing Shared PhysicalCustody. [B.C.S. v. J.A.S., 994 A.2d 600 (Pa.Super. 2010)]. 32:137-38.Mervan, Lorraine W. Clarification for Those Pre-1998 Support Agreements. [Nicholson v. Combs,550 Pa. 23, 703 A.2d 407 (1997)]. 20:3-4.Meyer, Charles J. A Finding of Criminal Contemptis Immediately Appealable. [Diamond v.Diamond, 715 A.2d 1190 (Pa. Super. 1998)].20:90-92.Michaelson, Sarinia A. In Loco Parentis StatusProvides Same Rights as a Parent in JuvenileDependency Proceedings. [In re D.K. & W.K.,922 A.2d 929 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. 29:100-01.Michaelson, Sarinia A. Equitable ReimbursementWhen Marital Assets Just are not Enough. [Wangv. Feng, 888 A.2d. 882 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. 28:15-16.Miles, Patricia A. Sole Proprietorship can haveEnterprise Goodwill Under Facts of Some Cases(But not This One). [Gaydos v. Gaydos, 693 A.2d1368 (1997)]. 19:51-54.Miller, Sally R. Best Interests Control in CustodyRelocation Cases. [Tripathi v. Tripathi, 787 A.2d436 (Pa. Super. 2001)]. 24:39-40.Miller, Sally R. Goodwill Valuation of VeterinaryPractice. [Baker v. Baker, 861 A.2d 298 (Pa.Super. 2004)]. 27:7-8.Miller, Sally R. Grant of Counsel Fees forContinuing Conduct in Custody Case. [Holler v.Smith, 928 A.2d 330 (Pa. Super 2007)]. 29:123-24.Miller, Sally R. Statutory Standing in GrandparentCustody Cases. [Martinez v. Baxter, 725 A.2d 775(Pa. Super. 1999)]. 21:35-36.Mirabile, Carolyn R. Best Interest StandardSupports Trial Court’s Holding That a PriorCriminal Record Does not Bar Someone as aKinship Provider. [In Re: J.P.; Appeal ofDepartment of Human Services, 998 A.2d 984(Pa. Super. 2010)]. 32:144-45.Mirabile, Carolyn R. Paternity by Estoppel: If OneWaits, It may be Too Late! [Ellison v. Lopez, 959A. 2d 295 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. 31:7-8.Mirabile, Carolyn R. Pennsylvania Superior CourtAbolishes Evidentiary Presumption Relating toSame-Sex Relationships in Custody and Affirmsthe Best Interest Standard. [M.A.T. v. G.S.T., 989A.2d 11 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. 32:20-21.Mirabile, Carolyn R. Supreme Court AdmitsParole Evidence to Define the Term ofCohabitation in a Property Settlement Agreement.[Kripp v. Kripp, 849 A.2d 1159 (Pa. 2004)].26:41-42.Molnar, Elisabeth W. Protection of Mental HealthRecords as it Applies to a Custody Case inPennsylvania. [Gates v. Gates, 967 A.2d 1024 (Pa.Super. 2009)]. 31:97-99.Moonay, Hillary J. Superior Court ConstruesPrenuptial Agreement Waiving TestamentaryRights to Also Waive Divorce Code Rights inAbsence of Express Language. [Stackhouse v.Zaretsky, 900A.2d. 383 (Pa. Super. 2006)].28:106-8.Moore, Richard I. Continuing Jurisdiction–“TheSignificant Connections Analysis”. [Kriebel v.Kriebel, 766 A.2d 854 (Pa. Super. 2000) andFavacchia v. Favacchia, 769 A.2d 531 (Pa. Super2001)]. 23:38-39.Moore, Richard I. Paternity Testing–Let theGames Begin. [Cable v. Anthou, 499 Pa. 553, 674A.2d 732 (1997)]. 19:76-77.Morrisey, Caren E. Divorce Decree Insufficient toDivest Beneficiary of ERISA Pension Plan inAbsence of Change of Beneficiary According toPlan Documents. [Kennedy, Executrix of theEstate of Kennedy, Deceased v. Plan12