index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in Postnuptial Agreement. [Miller v.Miller, 983 A.2d 736 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. 32:7-8.Bertin, Michael E. First Impression: BifurcationUnder the Amended Divorce Code. [Bonawits v.Bonawits, 907 A.2d 611 (Pa. Super. 2006)].29:98-100.Bertin, Michael E. Non-Biological GrandparentsGranted Standing in Child Custody Case. [Petersv. Costello 891 A.2d 705 (Pa. Super. 2005)].28:13-15.Bertin, Michael, E. PA Child Custody JurisdictionLost Despite Parent Remaining in PA. [Billhime v.Billhime, 952 A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super. 2008)].31:95-96.Bertin, Michael E. Sensitivity is Paramount inFight Over Child’s Remains. [Kulp v. Kulp, 920A.2d 867 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. 29:49-51.Bertin, Michael E. Sexual Assault Alone Does notEstablish Standing in Protection from AbuseCases. [Scott v. Shay, 928 A.2d. 312 (Pa. Super.2007)]. 29:137-39.Bertin, Michael E. Stress but No Duress:Agreement Valid. [Adams v. Adams, 848 A.2d991 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. 26:45-46.Bertin, Michael E. Sunny Florida: RelocationGranted. [Billhime v. Billhime, 869 A.2d 1031(Pa. Super. 2005)]. 27:59-61.Bertin, Michael E. Superior Court Says No toNetherlands Child Relocation Request. [Fuehrer v.Fuehrer, 906 A.2d 1198 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. 29:6-8.Bertin, Michael E. Two Cases on Standing: Case1: Third Party Asserting Paternity has No Standingin a Partial Custody Case Against an Intact FamilyUnit. [CW v. LV and GV, 788 A.2d 1002 (Pa.Super. 2001)]; Case: Former Same-Sex Partnerhas Standing in Partial Custody Case. [T.B. v.L.R.M., 786 A.2d 913 (Pa.2001)]. 24:3-5.Billies, Elizabeth J. Parent’s Progress TowardReunification not Enough to Overcome Petitionfor Goal Change and Termination. [In the Interestof R.M.G., a Minor; Appeal of: York CountyChildren and Youth Services, 997 A.2d 339 (Pa.Super. 2010)]. 32:193-94.Billies, Elizabeth J. Supreme Court Finds ThatReasonableness Must be Implied WhenDetermining an Award of Contractual CounselFees. [McMullen v. Kutz, 985 A.2d 769 (Pa.2009)]. 32:18-20.Billies, Elizabeth. Voluntary Resignation fromEmployment Does not Justify Reduction ofAlimony Pursuant to Post-Nuptial Agreement.[Williams v. Williams, 108 PDDRR 87 p.321].30:219-20.Blechman, Jay A. The Presumption of LegitimacyStill Lives. [Cozad v. Amrhein, 714 A.2d 409 (Pa.Super. 1998); Martin v. Martin, 710 A.2d 61 (Pa.Super. 1998)]. 20:57-59.Blessing, Maribeth. Supreme Court DifferentiatesBetween Postnuptial and Separation Agreements[Vaccarello v. Vaccarello, 563 Pa. 93, 757 A.2d909 (2000)]. 23:4-8.Bononi, Michele G. Custody Agreements will notOnly be Upheld Where All of the Terms areKnown by the Litigants. [Yates v. Yates, 936 A.2d1191 (Pa. Super 2007)]. 30:9-10.Bononi, Michele G. Paren[t]. Who AlreadyLocated has Burden to Show Best Interests OfChildren Served by Remaining with That Parent.[Klos v. Klos, 934 A2.d 724 (Pa. Super 2007)].29:131-32.Bononi, Michele G. Trial Court had Jurisdiction toEnforce Marital Property Settlement Agreementunder Divorce Code Where Agreement had notbeen Merged or Incorporated into Final DivorceDecree. [Annechino v. Joire, 946 A.2d 121 (Pa.Super. 2008)]. 30:82-83.Boyd, Melissa M. Equal Amenities at BothParents’ Houses not the Standard for ChildSupport in High Income Cases in Pennsylvania.[Rich v. Rich, 967 A.2d 400 (Pa. Super. 2009)].31:18-19.4