index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Winters v. Winters, 355 Pa. Super. 64, 512 A.2d1124 (1986)]. 7:902-4.Valuation of Marital Property: Separation orDistribution Date. [Downey v, Downey, 399 Pa.Super. 437, 582 A.2d 674 (1990)]. 12(1):6-7.Valuation of Marital Property: Separation orHearing Date. [Tocco v. Tocco, 389 Pa. Super.310, 567 A.2d 303 (1989)]. 10:121-22.Value of Employee Benefits Package andUndistributed Annuity Interest Must be Includedas Income Available for Child Support Purposes.[Arbet v. Arbet, 803 A.2d 34 (Pa. Super. 2004)].Darrren J. Holst. 27:4-7.Value of Interest in Law Firm Controlled byPartnership Agreement. [McCabe v. McCabe,Nos. 1353 & 1354 Phil. 1986 (April 10, 1987)].8:995-97.Value of Marital Property Limited to Terms ofLaw Firm Partnership Agreement. [McCabe v.McCabe, 374 Pa. Super. 451, 543 A.2d 558(1988)]. 9:20.Valuing a Pension–New Jersey Court Uses "TotalOffset Method". [Dipietro v. Dipietro, 183 N. J.Super. 69, 443 A.2d 244 (1981)]. 3:324-27.Valuing Increase of Non-Marital Trust and NoGoodwill Value of Sole Owner of VeterinarianPractice. [Solomon v. Solomon, 531 Pa. 113, 611A.2d 686 (1992)]. 13(4):2-3.Vento is Dead!!!! [Platek v. Platek, 309 Pa. Super.16, 454 A.2d 1059 (1982)]. 4:389-90.Vested and Non-Vested Pensions are MaritalProperty. [Kalinoski v. Kalinoski, Butler Co., F.C.No. 80-530 (1982)]. 4:394-99.Violation of Abuse Act Order is Indirect CriminalContempt and Due Process Must be Afforded.[Vito v. Vito, 380 Pa. Super. 258, 551 A.2d 471(1988)]. 10:65-66.Violation of the Protection of the Abuse Act:Indirect Criminal Contempt. [Wagner v. Wagner,387 Pa. Super. 246, 564 A.2d 162 (1989)].10(4):104-5.Voluntary Resignation fromEmployment Does notJustify Reduction of Alimony Pursuant to Post-Nuptial Agreement. [Williams v. Williams, 108PDDRR 87 p.321]. Elizabeth Billies. 30:219-20.Voluntary Termination of Parental RightsReversed Following "Unorthodox" Procedures Inthe Lower Court. [In Re: Adoption of Stickley:Appeal of McCook, 432 Pa. Super. 354, 638 A.2d976 (1994)]. 15(2):8-9.Wage Attachment or Equitable DistributionOrders. [Laughlin v. Laughlin, 525 Pa. 141, 578A.2d 922 (1990)]. 11:183-84.Was Wife's Move With Child Legitimate, or didShe "Abscond"? [Hamm v. Hamm, 431 Pa. Super.283, 636 A.2d 652 (1994)]. 15(2):10-11.Weighing Substance Abuse and Sexual Preferencein Determining Parental Fitness. [Barron v.Barron, 406 Pa. Super. 401, 594 A.2d 682(1991)]. 12(5):7.When Bankruptcy and Divorce Coincide EsoteriaPrevails. [Cohen v. Goldberg, 695 A.2d 806 (Pa.Super. 1997)]. 19:54-55.When can Putative Father Claim Custody Rightsto Child Born While Mother is Married to AnotherMan? [Dettinger v. McCleary, 438 Pa. Super. 300,652 A.2d 383 (1994)]. 17(2):3-5.When is a Custody Order Final and Appealable?not When it is an Interim Order Intended to be anInterim Measure–"Complete Resolution Test.".[G.B. v. M.M.B., 448 Pa. Super. 133, 670 A.2d714 (1996)]. Steven B. Schwartz. 18(2):4-5.When Local Court’s Reasoning Is not Evidentfrom Record Failure to File Rule 1925(a) OpinionCaused Reversal and Remand. [Bold v. Bold, 939A.2d 892 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Marion Laffey-Ferry. 30:3-5.Where Killing Done With "Will," There's No"Way" Killer can Take fromVictim's Estate. (In Re59