index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court Upholds Paternity by Estoppel andRelaxation of Wavier Doctrine Under HybridLocal Procedure. [Zadori v. Zadori, 443 Pa. Super.192, 661 A.2d 370 (1995) (1995)]. 17(4):5-6.Superior Court Upholds Trial Court OrderAwarding Spousal Support to Wife Who LeftMarital Residence upon Disclosure that Husbandwas a Transvestite. [McKolanis v. McKolanis, 435Pa. Super. 103, 644 A.2d 1256 (1994)]. 16(4):4-6.Superior Court Upholds Trial Court's Issuance ofPreliminary Injunction and Imposition ofConstructive Trust of Children's EducationalFunds. [Robbins v. Kristofic, 434 Pa. Super. 392,643 A.2d 1079 (1994)]. 15(3):5-7.Superior Court Upholds Trial Court's OrderAwarding Shared Legal and Primary PhysicalCustody of Child to Grandfather. [R.A.R. & M.E.R. v. T.M. & R.E.R., 434 Pa. Super. 592, 644A.2d 767(1994)]. 16(4):3-4.Support Action Brought Under New Statute ofLimitations Survives Despite Res Judicata RulingUnder Former Statute. [Fornwalt v. Follmer, 420Pa. Super. 413, 616 A.2d 1040 (1992)]. 14(1):7-8.Support–Arrearages–Proceeds from Post-DivorcePartition can be Used to Satisfy Arrearages.[Moyer v. Moyer, 292 Pa. Super. 434, 437 A.2d752 (1981)]. 2:216-18.Support Award: Interplay of Melzer Formula andStatewide Support Guidelines. [Seawalt v.Muldoon, 406 Pa. Super. 94, 593 A.2d 886(1991)]. 12(5):4-5.Support Case–Hearing De Novo Means HearingAnew. [D'Arciprete v. D'Arciprete, 323 Pa. Super.430, 470 A.2d 995 (1984)]. 5:572-573.Support Case–Loss of Employment due to WillfulMisconduct does not Constitute Change inCircumstances. [Schad v. Schaffner, Alleg. Co.,FD 81-5256 (1984)]. 5:632.Support Continues Until Entry of a DivorceDecree and an Appeal Stays the Effect of aDivorce Decree. [Tose v. Tose, Montgomery Co.,498 Sept. 1971 (April 30, 1981)]. 2:184-86.Support–Court Discusses Factors to be Consideredin Determining Earning Capacity. [Boni v. Boni,302 Pa. Super. 102, 448 A.2d 547 (1982)]. 3:306-9.Support for Child in College by Way of Alimony.[Barrone v. Barrone, 2 A.C.D.D. 188 (Allegh. Co.,1982)]. 3:366-67.Support Guidelines Reign Supreme. [Young v.Muthersbaugh, 415 Pa. Super. 591, 609 A.2d 1381(1992)]. 13(6):6-7.Support Guidelines: Two Part Test. [Shutter v.Reilly, 372 Pa. Super. 251, 539 A.2d 424 (1988)].9(2):12-13.Support Modification: Kinden Payments, EarningCapacity and Federal Tax Liability. [Adams v.Adams, 387 Pa. Super. 1, 563 A.2d 913 (1989)].10:123-25.Support Order: Physical or Financial Separation.[Shilling v. Shilling, 394 Pa. Super. 154, 575 A.2d145 (1990)]. 11:161.Support Order Runs fromDate of Filing ofComplaint In Support Until Entry of DivorceDecree. [Noldy v. Noldy, 340 Pa. Super. 588, 490A.2d 1376 (1985)]. 7:828-29.Support Procedures: Appointment of DistrictAttorney. [Steenland-Parker v. Parker, 375 Pa.Super. 457, 544 A.2d 1010 (1988)]. 9:36.Support–Property SettlementAgreement–Incorporation vs. Merger. [Brown v.Hall and Com. ex rel. Hall v. Hall, 495 Pa. 635,435 A.2d 859 (1981)]. 2:214-16.Support Provisions Under Post-Nuptial AgreementSurvive Despite Fact Other Provisions may beIllegal. [Huber v. Huber, 523 Pa. Super. 530, 470A.2d 1385 (1984)]. 5:583-85.Supreme Court Admits Parole Evidence to Definethe Term of Cohabitation in a Property SettlementAgreement. [Kripp v. Kripp, 849 A.2d 1159 (Pa.54