index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court Affirms Trial Court’s Refusal toReduce Support Obligation. [Nicholson v. Combs,437 Pa. Super. 334, 650 A.2d 55 (1994)]. 17(1):9-11.Superior Court Analyzes "Best Interests" and"Clear Necessity" Standards in SeparatingDependant Children from Their Natural Parents.[In The Interests of: S.S.; Appeal of: Steven S.,438 Pa. Super. 62, 651 A.2d 174 (1994)]. 17(2):7-8.The Superior Court Analyzes the InterplayBetween the Child Protective Services Law andthe Juvenile Act. [In the Interest of: J.R.W.,Appeal of: V.F., Appeal of A.W., 428 Pa. Super.597, 631 A.2d 1019 (1993)]. 15(1):11-13.Superior Court Applies “Specific Harm” Standardto Prevent Mother’s Request to Baptize Child.[Hicks v. Hicks, 868 A.2d 1245 (Pa. Super.2005)]. J. Alan Fuehrer. 27:54-55.Superior Court Approves Entry of Alimony OrderBased on Pennsylvania Agreement, Many YearsFollowing Final Divorce Decree in a Jurisdictionnot Permitting Alimony. [Polito v. Polito, 440 Pa.Super. 328, 655 A.2d 587 (1995)]. 17(3):7.Superior Court Assesses Costs Against Pro SeLitigant as Deterrent from Further Abuse of theCourts. [Winpenny v. Winpenny, 434 Pa. Super.348, 643 A.2d 677 (1994)]. 15(3):7-9Superior Court Compares and Contrasts DefinedBenefit Plans and Defined Contributions Plans.[Paulone v. Paulone, 473 Pa. Super. 130, 649 A.2d691 (1994)]. 16(5):8-10.Superior Court Confirms Custody of 15-Year-OldGirl in Aunt, With Whom She has Resided forThree Years, Despite the Claim of Her Mother, aRecovered Addict. [Cardamone v. Elshoff, 442 Pa.Super. 263, 659 A.2d 575 (1995)]. 17(4):2-3.Superior Court Construes Prenuptial AgreementWaiving Testamentary Rights to Also WaiveDivorce Code Rights in Absence of ExpressLanguage. [Stackhouse v. Zaretsky, 900A.2d. 383(Pa. Super. 2006)]. Hillary J. Moonay. 28:106-8.Superior Court Criticizes Local Procedure andRemands for Factual Determination of DueProcess Concerns. [Reimer v. Reimer, 442 Pa.Super. 689, 660 A.2d 663 (1995)]. 17(3):6.Superior Court Declares No Retroactive Credit forChild Support on Behalf of Emancipated Minor.[Holcomb v. Holcomb, 448 Pa. Super. 154, 670A.2d 1155 (1996)]. David L. Ladov. 18(3):5-6.Superior Court Declares that an EmancipatedMinor Child may be Re-Declared Dependent andUnemancipated. [Berks County Children andYouth Services v. Rowan, 428 Pa. Super. 448, 631A.2d 615 (1992)]. 15(1):6-8.Superior Court Declares Trial Court did notViolate Due Process Clause by not ConsideringMarital Misconduct in Equitable DistributionIssues. [Witcher v. Witcher, 433 Pa. Super. 14,639 A.2d 1187 (1994)]. 15(3):2-4.Superior Court Denies Visitation Rights to Sister.[Ken R., On Behalf of His Daughter, C. C.R. v.Arthur Z. and Mary Jane Z., (1994)]. 17(2):5-6.Superior Court does Away with UnallocatedSupport Orders in Divorce Actions. [Dubin v.Dubin, 372 Pa. Super. 84, 538 A.2d 1362 (1988)].9(2):12.Superior Court does not Permit Double Dipping(Including an Asset as Marital PropertyInequitable Distribution and an Income forSupport). [McCarty v. Smith, 440 Pa. Super. 280,655 A.2d 563 (1995)]. 17(3):5-6.Superior Court En Banc Overrules Miller v.Berschler, and Limits Immunity from Malpracticeof Attorneys Counseling Settlement Agreements.[McMahon v. Shea, 441 Pa. Super. 304, 657 A.2d938 (1995)]. 17(3):2.Superior Court Finds Condonation is an AdequateDefense to Adultery as it Precludes SpousalSupport. [Hoffman v. Hoffman, 762 A.2d 766 (Pa.Super. 2000)]. Jean Gilroy Gavlick. 23:9-10.Superior Court Finds Four Year Statute ofLimitations Inapplicable to Registration of Foreign52