index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETerminating the Parental Rights of theIncarcerated Parent: Clarity and Guidance fromtheSuperior Court. Dennis W. McCurdy. 27:13-15.There is No Such Thing as an Accrued Benefit (OrWhy Coverture Fractions Make Sense). CatherineM. McFadden. 12(3):14-16.The Third Circuit Decides the Role of CustodyEvaluators. Mark R. Ashton, David Draganoksy,and Susan J. Smith. 24:16-18.To Rhyme or not to Rhyme: An Appraisal. RobertE. Rains. 26:53-57.Two Recent Superior Court Cases on Pensions inDivorce. Marvin Snyder. 11:188.U.S. Supreme Court Identifies Pension Issues:Kennedy & Progeny Post-Decision Guidance.Catherine M. McFadden. 31:107-10.An Uncommon Law Marriage Case. Harry J.Gruener. 20:94-95.Understanding College Funding: What theDivorce Practitioner Needs to Know. Mark R.Ashton. 27:122-23.Unified Family Court for Pennsylvania. Lise A.Waldman. 19:18-19.Update on Pa. Supreme Court Support Guidelines.20:98.Uptown Legal Clinic. F. J. Lucchino. 27:16-17.The Valuation of S Corporation Stock: The EquityAdjustment Multiple. Daniel R. Van Vleet. 25:25-33.Valuation of Survivor Benefit for Purposes ofEquitable Distribution–Guidance for Practitionersin the Post-Palladino Era. Lawrence J. Sipos.21:15-16.Valuing and Distributing Increases and Decreases.Catherine M. McFadden. 15(2):13-15.Valuing Employee Stock Options. Joseph M.Egler and Andrew M. Wilusz. 19:81-82.Valuing Marital Assets After Sutliff. David L.Ladov and Kenneth Spiegel. 11:148.Views on Fisher v. Fisher, 769 A.2d 1165 (Pa.2001)–Stock Options. Les Barenbaum and BrianG. Lunney. 23:74-76.What is Reasonable Compensation? Kevin R.Yeanoplos and Ronald L. Seigneur. 30:92-100,174-82.What is the Definition of Cash Flow Available forSupport and What is Support? Robert S.Markovitz and Timothy A. Taylor. 23:67-68.What is Wrong With the Proposed SupportGuidelines. Thomas M. Mulroy. 10:70-71.(What) Pension is Marital Property. MarvinSnyder. 12(5):8.What to do When the IRS Agents Come Calling.Howard B. Klein. 20:48-49.When Bad Families Happen to Good Children.Thomas M. Mulroy. 19:64-65.The Wisdom of Solomon Finally Settles theConfusion of Sutliff. David S. Pollock. 13(4):16-20.Wisdom of the Sages. Jan C. Gabrielson. 21:137-38.Woman Convicted of Violating Own ProtectionOrder. Ellen S. Fischer. 25:109-10.Women in the Profession Commission.Commission Addresses One Family/One JudgeSystem–May 15, 1997. 19:17-18.Yes, Virginia, There is Such a Thing as anAccrued Benefit. Patricia G. Miller. 12(4):14-15.148
5C. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTADOPTIONBegler, Ann Lee. Open the Door for Children: ACounterpoint to Closing the Door on OpenAdoption. 18(3):19-21.Cahouet, Ann P., Lisa M. Colautti, and Rowena E.Dodson. Simple Work, Big Rewards. 22:70-71.Gruener, Harry J. Close the Door on OpenAdoptions. 18(3):18-19.McCurdy, Dennis W. Terminating the ParentalRights of the Incarcerated Parent: Clarity andGuidance fromthe Superior Court. 27:13-15.Pauker, Lawrence. Judicial Action Places Limitson Adoption. 9:53-55.ADULTERYNelson, Sharon D. and John W. Simek. Adulteryin the Electronic Era: Spyware, Avatars andCybersex. 30:19-26.ALIMONYBennett, Elizabeth L. Divorce, Older Women andAlimony. 16(5):15-17.Frank, Barry H. Alimony Revised Under TaxReform Act of 1986. 8:933-34.McFadden, Catherine M. Age and Alimony.17(2):13-15.Vetrano, Kathleen B. Elder Law and Divorce.16(5):13-15.ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONCasciato, Daniel. Collaborative Law. 29:141-42.Doherty, Mary Cushing. Practical Suggestions forMatrimonial Arbitration. 31:27-29.Hitzemann, Diane D. Collaborative Practice–AChoice for Families. 29:24-25.Rubin, Frederic D. Response to Wilder'sMediation Piece. 11:130.Wilder, Joanne Ross. Alternative DisputeResolution in Divorce Cases: The New Wave oran Ill Wind? 10:120.AMENDMENTS TO DIVORCE CODEHostetter, David L. and Wm. H. Nast.Applicability of 1988 Divorce Code Amendmentsto Pending Cases and Causes of Action AccruingPrior to Their Effective Date. 9:23-26.Howett, John C., Jr. A Practical View of the Effectof the 1988 Divorce Code Amendments onPending Cases. 9:26-28.Schorr, Gerald J. The 1988 Amendments: TenYears After. 20:103-8.ANTENUPTIAL/PRENUPTIAL/POSTNUPTIAL AGREEMENTSBusch v. Busch. [732 A.2d 1274]. Pa. Super.(1999). 21:131-37.Long, Brenden D. Prenuptial Agreement is notVoidable Under the Theory of FraudulentMisrepresentation as to the Value of Assets Unlessthe Party Attacking the Agreement ProvesJustifiable Reliance on the Misrepresentation:Porreco v. Porreco. 26:58-67.Miller, Patricia G. Karkaria: A New and UncertainTest for Pennsylvania Antenuptial Agreements.9:29-30.Miller, Patricia G. Simeone v. Simeone: ARejection of the Karkaria Test for PrenuptialAgreements. 10:71-72.Walzer, Peter M. Advice to a Client BeforeSigning a Premarital Agreement. 27:85-90.APPELLATE PRACTICEMunafo, Rachel. Supreme Court Decision Limits149
Page 1 and 2:
INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
Page 5 and 6:
Support-Guidelines ................
Page 7:
13. Sidebar .......................
Page 10 and 11:
PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
Page 12 and 13:
3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edit
Page 14 and 15:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
Page 16 and 17:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
Page 18 and 19:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
Page 20 and 21:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
Page 22 and 23:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
Page 24 and 25:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
Page 26 and 27:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
Page 28 and 29:
3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
Page 30 and 31:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
Page 32 and 33:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
Page 34 and 35:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
Page 36 and 37:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
Page 38 and 39:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
Page 40 and 41:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
Page 42 and 43:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee to Li
Page 44 and 45:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
Page 46 and 47:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
Page 48 and 49:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
Page 50 and 51:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
Page 52 and 53:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
Page 54 and 55:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
Page 56 and 57:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
Page 58 and 59:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
Page 60 and 61:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
Page 68 and 69:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
Page 70 and 71:
C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
Page 72 and 73:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
Page 74 and 75:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
Page 76 and 77:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
Page 78 and 79:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
Page 80 and 81:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
Page 82 and 83:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
Page 84 and 85:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
Page 86 and 87:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
Page 88 and 89:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
Page 90 and 91:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
Page 92 and 93:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
Page 94 and 95:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
Page 96 and 97:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
Page 98 and 99:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
Page 100 and 101:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
Page 102 and 103:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
Page 104 and 105:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
Page 106 and 107:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
Page 108 and 109: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
Page 110 and 111: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
Page 112 and 113: Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
Page 114 and 115: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
Page 116 and 117: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
Page 118 and 119: TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
Page 120 and 121: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
Page 122 and 123: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
Page 124 and 125: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
Page 126 and 127: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
Page 128 and 129: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
Page 130 and 131: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
Page 132 and 133: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
Page 134 and 135: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
Page 136 and 137: Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
Page 138 and 139: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
Page 140 and 141: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
Page 142 and 143: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLado
Page 144 and 145: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
Page 146 and 147: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
Page 148 and 149: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
Page 150 and 151: 5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
Page 152 and 153: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
Page 154 and 155: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
Page 156 and 157: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
Page 160 and 161: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua
Page 162 and 163: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
Page 164 and 165: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQU
Page 166 and 167: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
Page 168 and 169: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
Page 170 and 171: 6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
Page 172 and 173: Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
Page 174 and 175: Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
Page 176 and 177: 12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
Page 178 and 179: Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
Page 180: Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up
show all

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?