index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLETill Death Do Us Part? Grounds for Divorce Mustbe Established to Avoid the Abatement of aDivorce Action: 23 Pa.C.S.A. §3323(d.1). [Gerowv. Gerow, 962 A.2d 1206 (Pa. Super. 2008)].Kerri Lee Cappella. 31:11-13.Time Waits for No One, Including Pro SeLitigants. [Blatz v. Blatz, 412 Pa. Super. 449, 603A.2d 666 (1992)]. 13(3):7-8.Timing of Special Relief Motion. [Reese v. Reese,406 Pa. Super. 214, 593 A.2d 1312 (1991)].12(6):5.‘Tis not the “Season” for Calculating Support,Court Tells Recission Victim Father. [Paulus v.Paulus, 413 Pa. Super. 230, 604 A.2d 1103(1992)]. 13(3):5-6.To Merge or not to Merge: Modifiability ofSupport Agreement at Stake. [McGough v.McGough, 361 Pa. Super. 391, 522 A.2d 638(1987)]. 9:7.Tokach is Overlooked. [D'Huy v. D'Huy, 390 Pa.Super. 509, 568 A.2d 1289 (1990)]. 11:131-32.Tracing and Standard of Proof Required toOvercome Presumption of Marital Property.[Sutliff v. Sutliff, 515 Pa. 393, 528 A.2d 1318(1987)]. 8:976-80.Transfer of Pre-Marital Property Into Joint NamesConstitutes Gift of Martial Entity. [Brown v.Brown, 352 Pa. Super. 267, 507 A.2d 1223(1986)]. 7:849-50.Transfer of Primary Physical Custody as aSanction for Contempt of a Custody Order withouta Pending Petition for Modification and Hearingthereon is not Permitted. [Langendorfer v.Spearman, 797 A.2d 303 (Pa. Super. 2002)].Stephanie H. Winegrad. 24:38-39.Transfer of Property Set Aside Under §403(d).[Krenzelak v. Krenzelak, 307 Pa. Super. 499, 453A.2d 998 (1982)]. 4:417-18.Transfer of Separate Property into Joint NamesCreates Gift to the Marital Estate. [Burry v. Burry,111 Montg. Co. L. Rep. 330 (1982)]. 4:407-9.Transfer of Support Action. [Altschuler v.Altschuler, 334 Pa. Super. 111, 482 A.2d 1106(1984)]. 5:653-54.Trial Court Abused Its Discretion in Denying WifeAlimony. [Eck v. Eck, 327 Pa. Super. 334, 475A.2d 825 (1984)]. 5:606-7.Trial Court did not Improperly Modify CustodyOrder in Contempt Proceeding by Failing toImpose Sanction of Return of Child toJurisdiction, but Failure to Impose Any Sanctionsfor Contempt and Pronouncement RegardingFuture Jurisdiction Constituted Errors. [Harcar v.Harcar, 982 A.2d 1230 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. CherylB. Krentzman. 32:9-12.Trial Court Finds Tax Consequences AlreadyCalculated into Support Guidelines. [Reisinger v.Reisinger, 3 A.C.D.D. 65 (Allegh. Co., 1984)].5:582.Trial Court had Jurisdiction to Enforce MaritalProperty Settlement Agreement under DivorceCode Where Agreement had not been Merged orIncorporated into Final Divorce Decree.[Annechino v. Joire, 946 A.2d 121 (Pa. Super.2008)]. Michele G. Bononi. 30:82-83.Trial Court ay not Infuse Personal BeliefsOpposing Shared Physical Custody. [B.C.S. v.J.A.S., 994 A.2d 600 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. DonnaMcKillop. 32:137-38.Trial Court Must Appoint a Qualified Professionalto Provide Counselling to Parent Who has beenConvicted of Certain Crimes and Must HearfromThat Professional at the Time of Trial.[Ramer v. Ramer, 914 A.2d 894 (Pa. Super.2006)]. Gerald L. Shoemaker, Jr. 29:20-21.Trial Court Must Keep Its Eye on Ball inEvaluating Support Cases. [Seman v. Seman, 419Pa. Super. 20, 614 A.2d 1189 (1992)]. 13(6):7.Trial Court Must Set Forth Rationale forBifurcation on the Record Prior to the Entry of aDecree in Divorce. [Brian v. Brian, 872 A.2d 84357