index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua Sponte Powers of Court. 10:95-96.BANKRUPTCYCelentino, Christopher. Portions of the 2005Bankruptcy Reform Legislation of Interest toFamily Law Practitioners. 30:106-107.Monaghan, John J., Richard E. Lear, and Diane N.Rallis. Ponzi Schemes and Clawbacks: InvestorsPay Twice for the Crime of Others. 31:121-28.BIBLIOGRAPHYFishman, Joel. Divorce, Support and CustodyLaws & Related Subjects in Pennsylvania (1980-2005): A Bibliography. 28:50-91.CHILD ABUSEBennett, Elizabeth L. Evidence: NewDevelopments in Child Abuse Proceedings. 10:72-73.Bennett, Elizabeth L. The Discovery Rule andChild Abuse. 12(1):12.Rains, Robert E. The "Jen and Dave" Act–Act No.1996-119. 19:40-42.COMMON LAW MARRIAGEGruener, Harry J. An Uncommon Law MarriageCase. 20:94-95.Viola, Michael L. End of Common-Law Unions?The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court GoesWhere Others have only Imagined. 25:104-6.COMPUTER PROGRAMS/TECHNOLOGYBernbaum, Joel B. Bits and Bytes. 19:82.Davis, Russ and Donald Wochna. Computer asWitness–Should You Use It in Your Case? 30:26-29.Nelson, Sharon D. and John W. Simek. Adulteryin the Electronic Era: Spyware, Avatars andCybersex. 30:19-26.CONFLICT OF LAWSViola, Michael L. At Your Service. 31:29-31.COUNSEL FEESFeder, Robert D. Attorney's Fees and RestitutionAwards in Child Kidnapping Cases. 12(2):6-7.Hofstein, David N. and Kevin C. McCullough.Contingent Fees in Domestic Relations Matters.9:37-39.COURTSDoherty, Mary Cushing and Jeannine Turgeon.Partnership Means Progress for Family CourtReform. 25:43-44.Elliott, Kate Ford. Keynote Address: Kate FordElliott at PBA Family Law Section PittsburghWinter Meeting January 18, 1997. 19:14-17.Montella, Susan M. The “Computer Service Fee”Charged by Philadelphia Domestic RelationsDetersEstablished of Child Support. 25:13-14.Pollock, David S. Comments Re: KeynoteAddress. [Kate Elliott Ford]. 19:17.Rains, Robert E. To Rhyme or not to Rhyme: AnAppraisal. 26:53-57.Waldman, Lisa A. Unified Family Court forPennsylvania. 19:18-19.Women in the Profession Commission.Commission Addresses One Family/One JudgeSystem–May 15, 1997. 19:17-18.CRIMINAL LAWOrsatti, Benjamin E. Practical Issues for thePennsylvania Family Law Attorney Concerningthe Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects ofInternational Child Abduction, Oct. 25,1980,T.I.A.S. No. 11670, 19 I.L.M. 1501 (HagueConvention) International Child AbductionRemedies Act (ICARA), 42USC §11601 et seq.150
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECT28:120-27.Shepard, Michael D. Oral Communications Underthe Wiretap Act. 18(2):19-21.CUSTODYAshton, Mark R., David Draganosky, and Susan J.Smith. The Third Circuit Decides the Role ofCustody Evaluators. 24:16-18.Baer, Max. Custody Wars–The Creation of a NewWeapon of Mass Destruction. 21:121-25.Bertin, Emanuel A. Editor's Rebuttal to Dr. Crews'"In the Best Interest of the Child: A Legal Term ofArt." 10:70-71.Crews, Wanda J. In the Best Interest of the Child:A Legal Term of Art. 10:68-70.DeCecco, Lisa L. Defining Abuse of Discretion:The Standard of Review in Custody Cases.16(4):14-15.Durst, Robert J. Custody Relocation: New JerseyStyle. 21:126-29.Fischer, Ellen S. A Helpful Solution forSupervised Visitation and Difficult CustodyExchanges. 29:27.Glasser, Daniel H. Solomonic Resolution ofCustody Case–Israeli Style. 20:97-98.Hofstein, David N. Custody Litigation–The Roleof the Child. 20:10-14.Hofstein, David N. Stipulation for CustodyEvaluation. 21:129-30.King, Mark. Comment: ‘Qualified Professional.’.29:23-24.Ladov, David L. & Kenneth Spiegel. Parents havea Custodial Right to Inculcate Their ReligiousBeliefs upon Their Children. 11:167-68.Mulroy, Thomas M. Commonwealth v. ThePsychologists. 13(6):13-14.Mulroy, Thomas M. Elian Go Home. 22:11-12.Mulroy, Thomas M. Joint Custody: The PendulumSwings. 19:11-13.Mulroy, Thomas M. Rowles–A Crack in the Dam.18(1):15-16.Mulroy, Thomas M. When Bad Families Happento Good Children. 19:64-65.Rains, Robert E. Senate Bill 979—Expanding the“Jen & Dave” Act. 24:40-42.Richardson, James H., Jr. The Erie CountyCustody Mediation Process. 19:39-40.State Department's New Rules for Children'sPassports Intended to Augment Provisions ofChild-Custody Orders. [22 C.F.R. Part 51].18(3):17-18.Vogelson, Andrew R. Disturbed Parent-ChildAlignment and Custody Litigation. 11:150.Wecht, David N. Child Interviews in CustodyCases Involving Pro Se Parents. 31:106.Wecht, David N. Crimes, Counseling andCustody. 29:22-23.Wecht, David N. Overseas Deployments. 31:21-23.Wecht, David N. Parent Coordinators inPennsylvania: Some Initial Thoughts. 28:109-13.Zabowski, Diane M. Montgomery County AdoptsLocal Rule in Custody Cases. 12(4):16.CUSTODY–RELOCATIONBunde, Robb D. Relocation Orders, Like anyInterim Custody Order, are not Subject toImmediate Appeal. 20:100-1.Gold-Bikin, Lynne Z. "Relocation" Now hasGuidelines. 12(2):8.Mahood, James E. Relocation Orders are151
Page 1 and 2:
INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
Page 5 and 6:
Support-Guidelines ................
Page 7:
13. Sidebar .......................
Page 10 and 11:
PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
Page 12 and 13:
3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edit
Page 14 and 15:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
Page 16 and 17:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
Page 18 and 19:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
Page 20 and 21:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
Page 22 and 23:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
Page 24 and 25:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
Page 26 and 27:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
Page 28 and 29:
3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
Page 30 and 31:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
Page 32 and 33:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
Page 34 and 35:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
Page 36 and 37:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
Page 38 and 39:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
Page 40 and 41:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
Page 42 and 43:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee to Li
Page 44 and 45:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
Page 46 and 47:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
Page 48 and 49:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
Page 50 and 51:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
Page 52 and 53:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
Page 54 and 55:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
Page 56 and 57:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
Page 58 and 59:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
Page 60 and 61:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
Page 68 and 69:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
Page 70 and 71:
C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
Page 72 and 73:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
Page 74 and 75:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
Page 76 and 77:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
Page 78 and 79:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
Page 80 and 81:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
Page 82 and 83:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
Page 84 and 85:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
Page 86 and 87:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
Page 88 and 89:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
Page 90 and 91:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
Page 92 and 93:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
Page 94 and 95:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
Page 96 and 97:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
Page 98 and 99:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
Page 100 and 101:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
Page 102 and 103:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
Page 104 and 105:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
Page 106 and 107:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
Page 108 and 109:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
Page 110 and 111: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
Page 112 and 113: Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
Page 114 and 115: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
Page 116 and 117: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
Page 118 and 119: TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
Page 120 and 121: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
Page 122 and 123: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
Page 124 and 125: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
Page 126 and 127: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
Page 128 and 129: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
Page 130 and 131: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
Page 132 and 133: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
Page 134 and 135: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
Page 136 and 137: Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
Page 138 and 139: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
Page 140 and 141: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
Page 142 and 143: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLado
Page 144 and 145: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
Page 146 and 147: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
Page 148 and 149: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
Page 150 and 151: 5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
Page 152 and 153: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
Page 154 and 155: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
Page 156 and 157: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
Page 158 and 159: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETermi
Page 162 and 163: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
Page 164 and 165: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQU
Page 166 and 167: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
Page 168 and 169: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
Page 170 and 171: 6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
Page 172 and 173: Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
Page 174 and 175: Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
Page 176 and 177: 12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
Page 178 and 179: Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
Page 180: Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up
show all

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?