3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edi<strong>to</strong>r. Case Notes . . . . . . . . . . . 21:4-10, 35-42, 71-78, 111-120; 22:3-11, 33-38, 59-65;23:2-15, <strong>32</strong>-39, 55-62; 24:3-13, <strong>32</strong>-40, 97-106, 25:4-13, 63-78, 95-104; 26:4-11, 40-49, 105-11;27:3-12Ladov, David L., Edi<strong>to</strong>r; Lori Shem<strong>to</strong>b, Co-Edi<strong>to</strong>r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27:51-62, 112-21:28:3-16, 96-108,29:3-22,48-55, 85-101, 29:123-28; 30:3-11, 76-90, 148-63, 203-20; 31:4-20, 89-105, 157-66; <strong>32</strong>:5-24, 68-82, 137-45, 188-96.3A. CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORAsher, Aaron P. 19-Year-Old Adult Child WithMedical Conditions not Considered Emancipated.[Kotzbauer v. Kotzbauer, 937 A.2d 487 (Pa.Super. 2007)]. 30:5-7.Asher, Aaron P. Gates V. Gates: Alimony AwardLinked <strong>to</strong> Emancipation of Child Improper. [Gatesv. Gates, 933 A.2d 102 (Pa. Super. 2007)].29:127-28.Ash<strong>to</strong>n, Mark R. Frey and Separation: A Principlein Search of a Standard. [Frey v. Frey, 821 A.2d623 (Pa. Super. 2003)]. 25:65-66.Attiani, John P. Once Jurisdiction Attaches, aCourt Should Dispose of All Issues and QuestionsRelating <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Matter Before It. [In Re: I.L.P. andI.L.P., Joint Petition on Assisted Conception BirthRegistration; Appeal of: C.-H.L. and T.J.P., G.S.and B.S., 965 A.2d. 251 (Pa. Super. 2009)].31:99-100.Attiani, John P. Where No Petition <strong>to</strong> Modify wasFiled, <strong>the</strong> Trial Court Dismissal of <strong>the</strong> PFA Orderwas Improper. [Stamus v. Dutcavich, 938 A.2d1098 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. 30:84-86.Auerbach, Julie A. Child Support ObligationsTerminates Upon Death. [Benson v. Pastterson,782 A.2d 553 (Pa. Super. 2001)]. 23:55-56.Auerbach, Julie A. and William E. Ehrich.Significance of Retirement Date in PensionValuation. [DeMarco v. DeMarco, 787 A.2d 1072(Pa. Super. 2001)]. 24:8-9Auerbach, Julie. Wife’s Business Interest Intended<strong>to</strong> be Her Asset/ Husband’s Business Valuationnot Based Upon Intent of Partnership Agreement.[Brody v. Brody, 758 A.2d 1274 (Pa. Super.2000)]. 23:7-8.Bacine, Stephanie H. Party PrejudicefromIntroducing Evidence as a JustifiableDiscovery Sanction. [Hein v. Hein, 717 A.2d 1053(Pa. Super. 1998)]. 21:4-5.Badali, Christian V. Child Support and Paternity<strong>by</strong> Es<strong>to</strong>ppel. [Barr v. Bar<strong>to</strong>lo, 927 A.2d 635 (Pa.Super. 2007)]. 29:97-98.Badali, Christian V. Child Support Where Fa<strong>the</strong>rwas Sperm Donor and Determined <strong>to</strong> be anIndispensable Party in Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Action <strong>to</strong> ObtainChild Support fromFormer Same-Sex Partner.[Jacob v. Shultz-Jacob-Jacob & Framp<strong>to</strong>n, 923A.2d 473 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. 29:48-49.Badali, Christian V. Grandmo<strong>the</strong>r Cus<strong>to</strong>dy notEnough in Dependency Hearing Wheere It is aSham. [In Re J.C., 5 A.3d 284 (Pa. Super. 2010)].<strong>32</strong>:189-90.Bar<strong>to</strong>n-Rhea, Kilbreth E. Bankruptcy Discharge ofProperty Settlement Agreement EquitableDistribution Obligations Confirmed <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> StateCourt. [Hogg v. Hogg, 816 A.2d 314 (Pa Super.2003)]. 25:68-69.Beam, Lesley J. Administrative Error ThatResulted in Premature Termination of a ChildSupport Order May be Corrected Administrativelyas Well. [Castaldi v. Castaldi-Veloric, 993 A.2d903 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. <strong>32</strong>:76-78.Beckert, Susan J. Berring<strong>to</strong>n Held Applicable <strong>to</strong>Defined Benefit Plan in Immediate OffsetCase–Early Retirement Incentives Offered Post-2
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSeparation Excluded fromMarital Estate. [Gordonv. Gordon, 545 Pa. 391, 681 A.2d 7<strong>32</strong> (1996)].18(4):10-12.Behers, Carol A. and Elizabeth Lacy. HomewardBound: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets StricterJurisdictional Standards in Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Cases. [Dincerv. Dincer, 549 Pa. 309, 701 A.2d 210 (1997))].20:4-6.Benning<strong>to</strong>n, Elisabeth. Parental KidnappingPrevention Act Controls Interstate Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Case.[Skomo v. Skomo, 844 A.2d 1256 (Pa. Super.2004)]. 26:40-41Benning<strong>to</strong>n, Elisabeth. Typical Support CaseClarifies Law Regarding Earning Capacity,Employee Perquisites, Bonuses, 401(K)Contributions, Employer Matches, Exemptionsand Child Care Expenses. [Portugal v. Portugal,798 A.2d 246 (Pa. Super. 2002)]. 24:97-99.Bernstein, Cindy Trellis. The Presumption ofLegitimacy? Its Foundation is Crumbling and ItsSubstance is Coming Apart. [Brinkley v. King,549 Pa.241, 701 A.2d 176 (1997)]. 20:6-8.Bertin, Emanuel A. Agreement on Child SupportBinding. [Bell v. Bell, 390 Pa. Super. 526, 568A.2d 1297 (1990)]. 11:133.Bertin, Emanuel A. Cus<strong>to</strong>dial Mo<strong>the</strong>r DeniedRight <strong>to</strong> Move Child from Pennsylvania. [Lozinakv. Lozinak, 390 Pa. Super. 597, 569 A.2d 353 3(1990)]. 11:133-34.Bertin, Emanuel A. Estrangement is aConsideration in Awarding College Support.[Milne v. Milne, 383 Pa. Super. 177, 556 A.2d854 (1989)]. 10:88-89.Bertin, Emanuel A. Husband Es<strong>to</strong>pped fromAsserting Invalidity of Foreign Divorce Decree.[Lowenschuss v. Lowenschuss, 396 Pa. Super.531, 579 A.2d 377 (1990)]. 11:154-55.Bertin, Emanuel A. Law Partnership AgreementBinding on Court in Divorce Case. [McCabe v.McCabe, 525 Pa. 25, 575 A.2d 85 (1990)].11:142-43.Bertin, Emanuel A. Marital Funds Cannot be Used<strong>to</strong> Pay Post-Separation Debts. [Grandovic v.Grandovic, 387 Pa. Super. 617, 564 A.2d 960(1989)]. 10:121.Bertin, Emanuel A. The Meaning of <strong>the</strong> 1988Divorce Code Amendments Clarified. [Woodingsv. Woodings, 411 Pa. Super. 406, 601 A.2d 854(1992)]. 13(1):2.Bertin, Emanuel A. Religious Restriction inCus<strong>to</strong>dy Order Struck Down. [Zummo v. Zummo,394 Pa. Super. 30, 574 A.2d 1130 (1990)].11:143.Bertin, Emanuel A. Third Party Standing Clarifiedin Child Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Cases. [Gradwell v. Strausser,416 Pa. Super. 118, 610 A.2d 999 (1992)].13(3):2.Bertin, Emanuel A. Trial Court Reversed forFailure <strong>to</strong> Apply Important Child Cus<strong>to</strong>dyProcedures. [Cyran v. Cyran, 389 Pa. Super. 128,566 A.2d 878 (1989)]. 11:134-35.Bertin, Michael E. Balicki: Tax Ramifications andCosts in Equitable Distribution. [Balicki v.Balicki, 4 A.3d 654 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. <strong>32</strong>:195-96.Bertin, Michael E. Best Interest of <strong>the</strong> ChildParamount in Denial of Interstate RelocationPetition. [Speck v. Spadafore, 895 A.2d. 606 (Pa.Super. 2006)]. 28:98-99.Bertin, Michael E. Child Support ModificationRetroactive <strong>to</strong> Date of Misrepresentation. [Krebsv. Krebs, 944 A.2d 768 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. 30:79-81.Bertin, Michael E. Child Support: SupplementalNeeds Trust Distributions Considered Income.[Mencer v. Ruch, 928 A.2d 294 (Pa. Super.2007)]. 29:134-36.Bertin, Michael E. Court Enforces RulesRegarding In Camera Interviews With Childrenand Expert Reports. [Ot<strong>to</strong>lini v. Barrett, 954 A.2d610 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. 30:217-19.Bertin, Michael E. Enforcing Mortgage Payment3
- Page 1 and 2: INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
- Page 5 and 6: Support-Guidelines ................
- Page 7: 13. Sidebar .......................
- Page 10 and 11: PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
- Page 14 and 15: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
- Page 16 and 17: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
- Page 18 and 19: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
- Page 20 and 21: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
- Page 22 and 23: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
- Page 24 and 25: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
- Page 26 and 27: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
- Page 28 and 29: 3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
- Page 30 and 31: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
- Page 32 and 33: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
- Page 34 and 35: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 36 and 37: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
- Page 38 and 39: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
- Page 40 and 41: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
- Page 42 and 43: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee to Li
- Page 44 and 45: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
- Page 46 and 47: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
- Page 48 and 49: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
- Page 50 and 51: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
- Page 52 and 53: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
- Page 54 and 55: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
- Page 56 and 57: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
- Page 58 and 59: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
- Page 60 and 61: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
- Page 62 and 63:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 64 and 65:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 66 and 67:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
- Page 68 and 69:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
- Page 70 and 71:
C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
- Page 72 and 73:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
- Page 74 and 75:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
- Page 76 and 77:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
- Page 78 and 79:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
- Page 80 and 81:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
- Page 82 and 83:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
- Page 84 and 85:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
- Page 86 and 87:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
- Page 88 and 89:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 90 and 91:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
- Page 92 and 93:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
- Page 94 and 95:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
- Page 96 and 97:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 98 and 99:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
- Page 100 and 101:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
- Page 102 and 103:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
- Page 104 and 105:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
- Page 106 and 107:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
- Page 108 and 109:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
- Page 110 and 111:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
- Page 112 and 113:
Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
- Page 114 and 115:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
- Page 116 and 117:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
- Page 118 and 119:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
- Page 120 and 121:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
- Page 122 and 123:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
- Page 124 and 125:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
- Page 126 and 127:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
- Page 128 and 129:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
- Page 130 and 131:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
- Page 132 and 133:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
- Page 134 and 135:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
- Page 136 and 137:
Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
- Page 138 and 139:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
- Page 140 and 141:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
- Page 142 and 143:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLado
- Page 144 and 145:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
- Page 146 and 147:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
- Page 148 and 149:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
- Page 150 and 151:
5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
- Page 152 and 153:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
- Page 154 and 155:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
- Page 156 and 157:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
- Page 158 and 159:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETermi
- Page 160 and 161:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua
- Page 162 and 163:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
- Page 164 and 165:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQU
- Page 166 and 167:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
- Page 168 and 169:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
- Page 170 and 171:
6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
- Page 172 and 173:
Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
- Page 174 and 175:
Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
- Page 176 and 177:
12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
- Page 178 and 179:
Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
- Page 180:
Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up