index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorce Decree. [Annechino v. Joire, 946 A.2d121 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Michele G. Bononi. 30:82-83.SLAYER'S ACTWhere Killing Done With "Will," There's No "Way"Killer can Take from Victim's Estate. (In re Estate ofBartolovich, 420 Pa. Super. 419, 616 A.2d 1043(1992)]. 14(2):15-16.SOCIAL SECURITYSocial Security Derivative Benefits can be Subject toLegal Process Under 42 U.S.C.A. § 659. [Silver v.Pinskey (731 MDA 2007)]. Jonathan T. Hoffman.32:23-25.SUPPORTAdministrative Error That Resulted in PrematureTermination of a Child Support Order May beCorrected Administratively as Well. [Castaldi v.Castaldi-Veloric, 993 A.2d 903 (Pa. Super. 2010)].Lesley J. Beam. 32:76-78.Agreed Support in Conjunction With PropertySettlement Agreement not Modifiable. [Nessa v. Nessa,399 Pa. Super. 59, 581 A.2d 674 (1990)]. 11:194.Agreement on Child Support Binding. [Bell v. Bell, 390Pa. Super. 526, 568 A.2d 1297 (1990)]. Emanuel A.Bertin. 11:133.Alimony is Income to Non-Custodial Parent for ChildSupport Purposes, Divided Panel Declares. [Hyde v.Hyde, 421 Pa. Super. 415, 618 A.2d 406 (1992)].14(1):4-5.Attachment of Personal Injury/Workers’ CompensationAwards to Satisfy Support Arrears. [Faust v. Walker,945 A.2d 212 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Stephanie H.Winegrad. 30:83-84.Base All Orders for Support on Specific IncomeFindings. [Dalessandro v. Dalessandro, 366 Pa. Super.479, 531 A.2d 518 (1987]. 9:4.Bonuses: a Proper Consideration for Support Orders.[Fichthorn v. Fichthorn, 368 Pa. Super. 305, 533 A.2d1388 (1987)]. 9:2.Burden of Proof for Support Petition: Legal Cause.[Clendenning v. Clendenning, 392 Pa. Super. 33, 572A.2d 18 (1990)]. 11:161-62.Child Support Agreement Between Parents: Is itBinding? [Roberts v. Furst, 385 Pa. Super. 530, 561A.2d 805 (1989)]. 10(4):103.Child Support and Paternity by Estoppel. [Barr v.Bartolo, 927 A.2d 635 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Christian V.Badali. 29:97-98.Child Support Award Based on Earning Capacity Heldto be Applicable only in Cases Where There is a Pre-Existing Court Order. [Klahold v. Kroh, 437 Pa. Super.150, 649 A.2d 701 (1994)]. 17(1):7-8.Child Support Case. [Groner v. Groner, 328 Pa. Super.191, 476 A.2d 957 (1984)]. 5:594-96.Child Support Complaint Barred Based on ResJudicata, Superior Court Declares. [Scott v. Mershon,(1995)]. 17(4):6.The Child Support Implications of the Second Family.[Frankenfield v. Fesser, 449 Pa. Super. 47, 672 A.2d1347 (1996); Elias v. Spencer, 449 Pa. Super. 359, 673A.2d 982 (1996)]. Steven B. Schwartz. 18(4):6-7.Child Support Modification Retroactive to Date ofMisrepresentation. [Krebs v. Krebs, 944 A.2d 768 (Pa.Super. 2008)]. Michael E. Bertin. 30:79-81.Child Support Obligations Terminates Upon Death.[Benson v. Pastterson, 782 A.2d 553 (Pa. Super.2001)]. Julie A. Auerbach. 23:55-56.Child Support Order Vacated Due to Trial Court'sFailure to Follow Melzer Formula. [Weckerly v.Weckerly, 357 Pa. Super. 644, 513 A.2d 1182 (1986)].7:864.Child Support: Supplemental Needs Trust DistributionsConsidered Income. [Mencer v. Ruch, 928 A.2d 294(Pa. Super. 2007)]. Michael E. Bertin. 29:134-36.Child Support-Two Kids: Separate Households.[Blaisure v. Blaisure, 395 Pa. Super. 473, 577 A.2d 64092