index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGoodwill Revisited–Dental Practice. [Fexa v. Fexa, 396Pa. Super. 481, 578 A.2d 1314 (1990)]. 11:184.Goodwill Valuation of Veterinary Practice. [Baker v.Baker, 861 A.2d 298 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. Sally R.Miller. 27:7-8.Sole Proprietorship can Have Enterprise GoodwillUnder Facts of Some Cases (But not this One). [Gaydosv. Gaydos, 693 A.2d 1368 (1997)]. Patricia A. Miles.19:51-54.Sole Proprietorship does not Have Good Will. [Beasleyv. Beasley, 359 Pa. Super. 20, 518 A.2d 545 (1986)].8:940-46.Valuing Increase of Non-Marital Trust and NoGoodwill Value of Sole Owner of VeterinarianPractice. [Solomon v. Solomon, 531 Pa. Super. 113,611 A.2d 686 (1992)]. 13(4):2-3.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION–INSURANCEChange in Beneficiary did not Violate Order EnjoiningHusband from Disposing of Marital Property. [Lindseyv. Lindsey, 342 Pa. Super. 72, 492 A.2d 396 (1985)].7:826-828Court Utilizes Equitable Powers to Impose ConstructiveTrust on Insurance Proceeds. [Beamer v. Beamer, 330Pa. Super. 154, 479 A.2d 485 (1984)]. 5:603-5Life Insurance Proceeds: Equitable Distribution.[Schubert v. Schubert, 398 Pa. Super. 284, 580 A.2d1351 (1990)]. 11:197-98.Property Settlement Agreement/life Insurance Policy:Separate and Distinct Documents. [Estate of Myers,375 Pa. Super. 351, 544 A.2d 506 (1988)]. 9:33.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION–PENSIONS ANDRETIREMENT PLANSAttachment of School Teacher's Pension. [Millick v.Millick, 140 Pa. Cmwlth. 252, 592 A.2d 788 (1991)].12(4):3-4.Bankruptcy Discharge of Property SettlementAgreement Equitable Distribution ObligationsConfirmed by the State Court. [Hogg v. Hogg, 816A.2d 314 (Pa Super.2003)]. Kilbreth E. Barton-Rhea.25:68-69.Berrington & Brown in a Nutshell. [Berrington v.Berrington, 534 Pa. Super. 393, 633 A.2d 589 (1993);Brown v. Brown, 447 Pa. Super. 424, 669 A.2d 969(1995)]. Brian C. Vertz. 18(2):13-14.Berrington v. Berrington and Katzenberger v.Katzenberger. [Berrington v. Berrington, 409 Pa.Super. 355, 598 A.2d 31 (1991); Katzenberger v.Katzenberger, 534 Pa. Super. 419, 633 A.2d 602(1991)]. 12(5):2-3.Bigamy and Pension Benefits. [Board of Pensions andRetirement, City of Philadelphia v. Boelter, 132 Pa.Cmwlth. 336, 573 A.2d 867 (1990)]. 11:148-49.Binding Effect of Agreement's Intentions andInteresting Pension Issues. [Lyons v. Lyons, 401 Pa.Super. 271, 585 A.2d 42 (1991)]. 12(3):4-6.Cornbleth has Exceptions. [McClain v. McClain, 693A.2d 1355 (Pa. Super. 1997)]. Daniel J. Clifford.19:57-58.Court's Equitable Distribution Order Dividing StatePension Held Valid. [Graham v. Graham, 416 Pa.Super. 118, 610 A.2d 999 (1990)]. 11:182.A Disability Pension or District Disability Portion of aPension is a Nonmarital Asset and not Subject toEquitable Distribution. [Cioffi v. Cioffi, 885 A.2d 45(Pa. Super. 2005)]. Loreen M. Burkett. 28:5-7.Disability Pension Subject to Equitable Distribution,Superior Court Declares. [Hayward v. Hayward, 428Pa. Super. 332, 630 A.2d 1275 (1993)]. 15(1):15-16.Early Retirement Incentive Benefits. [Meyer v. Meyer,561 Pa. 225, 749 A.2d 917 (2000)]. Gary L.Friedlander. 22:63-65.Equitable Distribution–Pensions. [Kikkert v. Kikkert,177 N. J. Super. 471, 427 A.2d 76 (1981)]. 2:218-20.Equitable Distribution/Validity of Waiver inAgreement. [Holz v. Holz, 850 A.2d 751(Pa. Super.2004)]. Rochelle Grossman. 26:42-43.85