index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 331, 619 A.2d 703 (1992)]. 14(2):6-8.Gates V. Gates: Alimony Award Linked toEmancipation of Child Improper. [Gates v. Gates, 933A.2d 102 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Aaron P. Asher. 29:127-28.Judge Calls for Legislature to Clarify Guidelines ofAlimony Awards. [Peterson v. Peterson, 427 Pa. Super.572, 629 A.2d 1017 (1993)]. 14(5):2-3.Letter Asking Parents for Wife's Hand does notTranslate to Indefinite Handout of Alimony. [Viles v.Viles, 416 Pa. Super. 95, 610 A.2d 988 (1991)].13(4):4-6.Only Plaintiff in Fault Divorce can Move for Entry ofDivorce Decree. [Laxton v. Laxton, 345 Pa. Super. 450,498 A.2d 909 (1985)]. 7:840-41.Order Denying or Granting Interim Relief is a Final andAppealable Order. [Sutliff v. Sutliff, 326 Pa. Super.496, 474 A.2d 599 (1984)]. 5:564-67.Payments in Lieu of Property Distribution are notAlimony, Supreme Court Rules. [Zullo v. Zullo, 531Pa. 377, 613 A.2d 544 (1992)]. 13(6):10-11.Pennsylvania has Jurisdiction to Hear Economic Issues,Even Though Parties are Divorced in South Carolina.[Cheng v. Cheng, 347 Pa. Super. 515, 500 A.2d 1175(1985)]. 7:832-35.Property Received as Part of Equitable Distribution isa Relevant Factor in Determining Whether AlimonyShould be Awarded. [Geyer v. Geyer, 310 Pa. Super.456, 456 A.2d 1025 (1983)]. 4:405-7.Satisfaction of Proven Reasonable Needs, notEqualization of Income, Is Polestar for DeterminingMonthly Alimony Amount. [Dalrymple v. Kilishek, 920A.2d 1275 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. Darren J. Holst. 29:51-52.Superior Court Approves Entry of Alimony OrderBased on Pennsylvania Agreement, Many YearsFollowing Final Divorce Decree in a Jurisdiction notPermitting Alimony. [Polito v. Polito, 440 Pa. Super.328, 655 A.2d 587 (1995)]. 17(3):7.Termination of Relationship With Paramour Prior toTrial will not Preclude Finding of Cohabitation. [Moranv. Moran, 839 A.2d 1091 (Pa. Super. 2003)]. MargaretLucas. 26:6-7.Test for Reimbursement Alimony/Equity: UnjustEnrichment. [Bold v. Bold, 374 Pa. Super. 317, 542A.2d 1374 (1988)]. 9:21-22.Trial Court Abused its Discretion in Denying WifeAlimony. [Eck v. Eck, 327 Pa. Super. 334, 475 A.2d825 (1984)]. 5:606-7.Wife's Remarriage Doesn't Terminate Agreed-uponAlimony Absence Express Cut-off Date. [McMahon v.McMahon, 417 Pa. Super. 592, 612 A.2d 1360 (1992)].13(5):4-6.Workers’ Compensation Award held in Escrow to PayAlimony. [Dudas v. Pietrzykowski, 813 A.2d 1 (Pa.Super. 2002)]. Jennifer M. McEnroe. 25:10-12.DIVORCE–ALIMONY PENDENTE LITEAlimony Pendente Lite. [Mckelvey v. Mckelvey, 16D.&C.3d 611 (Armstrong Co. 1980); Thoma v. Thoma,284 Pa. Super. 249, 425 A.2d 797 (1981)]. 2:132-34Alimony Pendente Lite and Support–Court Rules Partymay Maintain Actions for Both. [Remick v. Remick,310 Pa. Super. 23, 456 A.2d 163 (1983)]. 4:429-432Alimony Pendente Lite Case. [Sands v. Sands, 112Montg. Co. L. Rep. 287 (1983)]. 4:469-71.Appeal from Order Granting or Denying Interim ReliefStays All Proceedings. [Prozzoly v. Prozzoly, 327 Pa.Super. 326, 475 A.2d 820 (1984)]. 5:579-81.Appeal of Distribution Order Doesn't Entitle Spouse toAlimony Pendente Lite. [Spink v. Spink, 422 Pa. Super.126, 619 A.2d 277 (1992)]. 14(2):5-6.Court Analyzes Tax Benefits in Determining True Costof Alimony Pendente Lite to Payor. [Hovis v. Hovis, 6A.C.D.D. 197 (1984)]. 5:619-21.Court Sets Forth Factors to be Used in Making AlimonyPendente Lite Award. [Orr v. Orr, 110 Montg. Co. L.Rep. 273 (1982)]. 3:298-300.74