index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461, 514 A.2d 1374 (1986)]. 7:912-16.Commencement of Second Divorce Action in AnotherCounty Violative of Spirit of Divorce Code. [Gantz v.Gantz, 338 Pa. Super. 528, 448 A.2d 17 (1985)]. 6:696-97.Court May Consider Fault Grounds, Even When No-Fault Grounds Have Been Established. [Restifo v.Restifo, 339 Pa. Super. 352, 489 A.2d 196 (1985)].6:675-76.Court Sets Aside Divorce Due to Wife's Failure toFollow Rules of Procedure. [Crookes v. Crookes, 346Pa. Super. 315, 499 A.2d 626 (1985)]. 6:781-83.Court Sets Forth Procedures to be Followed After Entryof a Divorce Decree and Equitable Distribution Order.[Colagioia v. Colagioia, 362 Pa. Super. 213, 523 A.2d1158 (1987)]. 8:959-60.Court's Ignoring a Petition for Reconsideration Doesn'tMake Wife less "Appealing" on Merits. [Waddingtonv. Waddington, 425 Pa. Super. 241, 624 A.2d 657(1993)]. 14(4):10-11.Death Prevents Entry of Posthumous Divorce DecreeEven Though Equitable Distribution Proceeds. [Yelenicv. Clark, 922 A.2d 935 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. Stephanie L.Jablon. 29:53-54.Decree Entered Prior to Code Cannot be Affected byCode. [Ewiak v. Ewiak, 328 Pa. Super. 83, 476 A.2d464 (1984)]. 5:602.Divorce Decree does not Automatically TerminateRight of Party as Beneficiary. [Stowell v. Stowell, 3dCir., No. 84-1037 (Oct. 26, 1984)]. 5:656-58.Divorce Decree Insufficient to Divest Beneficiary ofERISA Pension Plan in Absence of Change ofBeneficiary According to Plan Documents. [Kennedy,Executrix of the Estate of Kennedy, Deceased v. PlanAdministrator for Dupont Savings and Investment Planet al. 129 S. Ct. 865(2009)]. Caren E. Morrisey. 31:4-5.Enforceability of Agreement Incorporated into DivorceDecree. [Kasloff v. Kasloff, Montg. Co., 81-5390,Equity (1982)]. 4:401-3.Equitable Powers of the Court to Modify an EquitableDistribution Order More Than 30 Days Following theEntry of a Divorce Decree. [Johnson v. Johnson, 864A.2d 1224 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. Stephanie H. Winegard.27:51-52.Extrinsic Fraud: Petition to Vacate Divorce Decree.[Foley v. Foley, 392 Pa. Super. 9, 572 A.2d 6 (1990)].11:144-45.Failure to Inform Employer RE: Divorce SubjectsEmployee to Liability for Post-Divorce Health BenefitsPaid when No Health Insurance Premiums Paid.[Trustees of the AFTRA Health Fund v. Biondi, 303thF.2d 765 (7 Cir. 2002)]. David I. Grunfeld. 24:106.Marry at Haste, Divorce from Previous MarriageSpouse at Leisure? Second Marriage Still Valid.[Covington v. Covington, 421 Pa. Super. 328, 617 A.2d1318 (1992)]. 14(3):9-10.Mutual Mistake of Fact Won't Invalidate DivorceDecree. [Holteen v. Holteen, 413 Pa. Super. 591, 605A.2d 1275 (1992)]. 13(3):7.Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure–Should TheyBeApplied Rigidly? [Kurtas v. Kurtas, 521 Pa. 105,555 A.2d 804 (1989)]. 10(2):78-79.Procedural Due Process Rights Cannot Succumb to theEquitable Aims of the Divorce Code. [Mayer v.Garman, 590 Pa. 268, 912 A.2d 762 ( 2006)]. Darren J.Holst. 28:100-2.Sensitivity is Paramount in Fight Over Child’s Remains.[Kulp v. Kulp, 920 A.2d 867 (Pa. Super. 2007)].Michael E. Bertin. 29:49-51.Superior Court Criticizes Local Procedure andRemands for Factual Determination of Due ProcessConcerns. [Reimer v. Reimer, 442 Pa. Super. 689, 660A.2d 663 (1995)]. 17(3):6.Timing of Special Relief Motion. [Reese v. Reese, 406Pa. Super. 214, 593 A.2d 1312 (1991)]. 12(6):5.Validity of Third Party's Intervention in DivorceProceedings. [Luiziaga v. Psolka, 432 Pa. Super. 26,637 A.2d 645 (1994)]. 15(2):5-6.72