CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court Declares. [Moran v. Moran, 417Pa. Super. 549, 612 A.2d 1075 (1992)]. 13(6):2.[Constitutionality of Equitable Distribution].[Bacchetta v. Bacchetta, 29 Chester Co. L. Rep.167 (1981)]. 2:154-55.Constructive Trust may Attach <strong>to</strong> Non-DisclosedMarital Assets Regardless of Withholder's Intent.[Creeks v. Creeks, 422 Pa. Super. 4<strong>32</strong>, 619 A.2d754 (1993)]. 14(3):8-9.Contempt Powers Available <strong>to</strong> Enforce CounselFee Order. [Mo<strong>the</strong>ral v. Mo<strong>the</strong>ral, 7 A.C.D.D.103, 133 P.L.J. 116 (Allegh. Co., 1984)]. 5:655-56.‘Continuing Contract’ Nature of MaritalSettlement Agreement Tolls Statute of Limitations;Deviation fromRules of Appellate ProcedureResults in Waiver. [Crispo v. Crispo, 909 A.2d308 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. Benjamin E. Orsatti.29:10-11.Continuing Jurisdiction–“The SignificantConnections Analysis”. [Kriebel v. Kriebel, 766A.2d 854 (Pa. Super. 2000) and Favacchia v.Favacchia, 769 A.2d 531 (Pa. Super 2001)].Richard I. Moore. 23:38-39.Cornbleth has Exceptions. [McClain v. McClain,693 A.2d 1355 (Pa. Super. 1997)]. Daniel J.Clifford. 19:57-58.Costs can be Awarded upon Final Disposition.[Fried v. Fried, <strong>32</strong>6 Pa. Super. 271, 473 A.2d1087 (1984)]. 5:567-68.Corpus of Inheritance Included as Income inCalculating Child Support. [Humphreys v.DeRoss, 737 A.2d 775 (Pa. Super. 1999)]. GeraldJ. Schorr. 21:111-14.Counsel Fees–Fac<strong>to</strong>r of Who CommencedDivorce Action not Relevant. [Lawrence v.Lawrence, 347 Pa. Super. 57, 500 A.2d 154(1985)]. 7:811-13.Counsel Fees Awarded In Unfounded SexualAbuse Complaint. [M.C. v. R.W., 398 Pa. Super.183, 580 A.2d 1124 (1990)]. 12(1):7-8.Court Addresses Issue of Validity of PalimonyActions. [Knauer v. Knauer, Jr., <strong>32</strong>3 Pa. Super.206, 470 A.2d 553 (1984)]. 5:530-36.Court Analyzes Tax Benefits in Determining TrueCost of Alimony Pendente Lite <strong>to</strong> Payor. [Hovis v.Hovis, 6 A.C.D.D. 197 (Allegh. Co., 1984)].5:619-21.Court Annuls 24 Year Marriage on Grounds ofImpotency. [Manbeck v. Manbeck, 339 Pa. Super.493, 489 A.2d 748 (1985)]. 6:728-<strong>32</strong> (June, 1985)Court Awards Value at Date of Marriage of Pre-Marital Home <strong>to</strong> Party Who Brought <strong>to</strong> Marriage.[Durham v. Durham, 6 A.C.D.D. 300 (Allegh. Co.,1984)]. 5:636-37.Court Awards Wife Alimony of UnlimitedDuration. [Pacella v. Pacella, 342 Pa. Super. 178,492 A.2d 707 (1985)]. 7:835-37.Court Awards Wife Exclusive Possession of HomeUntil Child Completes High School. [Simpson v.Simpson, Westmoreland Co., 268 of 1982-D(1983)]. 5:552-54.Court Awards Wife Permanent Alimony. [Pacellav. Pacella, Allegheny County, No 517 of 1979(1982)]. 4:441-44.Court Cannot Dismiss Divorce Complaint SuaSponte Without Affording Plaintiff Prior Notice.[Hoffman v. Hoffman, 350 Pa. Super. 1280, 504A.2d 356 (1986)]. 7:838.Court Correctly Concludes Marital Residence asMarital Property Notwithstanding SeparationAgreement. [Barnhart v. Barnhart, 343 Pa. Super.234, 494 A.2d 443 (1985)]. 6:767-69.Court Creates Constructive Trust. [Brasile v.Estate of Louis Brasile, 354 Pa. Super. 400, 512A.2d 10 (1986)]. 7:877-78.Court Decides Shared Legal Cus<strong>to</strong>dy / ReligiousDispute. [Shepp v. Shepp, 821 A.2d 635 (Pa.Super. 2003)]. Harry M. Byrne, Jr. 25:76-78.24
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLECourt Defines "Cohabitation.". [So<strong>by</strong> v. So<strong>by</strong>, 113Montg. Co. L. Rep. 406 (1983)]. 5:596-97.Court Defines Cohabitation for Purposes of §507.[Miller v. Miller, 353 Pa. Super. 194, 509 A.2d291 (1986)]. 7:856-58.Court Enforces Rules Regarding In CameraInterviews With Children and Expert Reports.[Ot<strong>to</strong>lini v. Barrett, 954 A.2d 610 (Pa. Super.2008)]. Michael E. Bertin. 30:217-19.Court Establishes Formula for Child Support.[Melzer v. Witsberger, 505 Pa. 462, 480 A.2d 991(1984)]. 5:588-91.Court Finds Child has a Right <strong>to</strong> be Supported inVocational School. [Maurer v. Maurer, 382 Pa.Super. 468, 555 A.2d 1294 (1989)]. 10(2):77-78.Court Finds Fa<strong>the</strong>r Obligated <strong>to</strong> Support SonAttending Law School. [Brown v. Brown, 8A.C.D.D. 199 (Allegh. Co., 1983)]. 4:438-39.Court Finds Mortgage Payments Toge<strong>the</strong>r WithResulting Appreciation on Pre-Owned Property isMarital. [Ball v. Ball, 5 A.C.D.D. 174 (Allegh.Co., 1983)]. 4:512-14.Court Finds No Obligation <strong>to</strong> SupportEmancipated Child in Professional School.[Brown v. Brown, <strong>32</strong>7 Pa. Super. 51, 474 A.2d1168 (1984)]. 5:581-582.Court Holds Law Practice does not have Goodwill.[Beasley v. Beasley, 115 Montg. Co. L. Rep. 99(1984)]. 5:612-14.Court Imposes Reasonableness Standard onAt<strong>to</strong>rney's Fees Provision in Property SettlementAgreement. [McMullen v. Kutz, 925 A.2d 8<strong>32</strong>(Pa. Super. 2007)]. Amy J. Phillips. 29:88-91.Court May Consider Fault Grounds, Even WhenNo-Fault Grounds have been Established. [Restifov. Restifo, 339 Pa. Super. 352, 489 A.2d 196(1985)]. 6:675-76.Court Reviews "Separate and Apart" Standard.[Pangallo v. Pangallo, <strong>32</strong>9 Pa. 25, 477 A.2d 885(1984)]. 5:600-2.Court Rules that Parties' Ante-Nuptial AgreementPrecluded Wife's Claims for Ancillary Relief.[Laub v. Laub, 351 Pa. Super. 110, 505 A.2d 290(1986)]. 7:851-52.Court Sets Aside Divorce due <strong>to</strong> Wife's Failure <strong>to</strong>Follow Rules of Procedure. [Crookes v. Crookes,346 Pa. Super. 315, 499 A.2d 626 (1985)]. 6:781-83.Court Sets Forth Charges Permitted as Part ofAdoption Proceedings. [In Re: Ba<strong>by</strong> Girl D., 512Pa. 449, 517 A.2d 925 (1986)]. 8:946-50.Court Sets Forth Fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> be Used in MakingAlimony Pendente Lite Award. [Orr v. Orr, 110Montg. Co. L.R. 273 (1982)]. 3:298-300.Court Sets Forth Procedures <strong>to</strong> be Followed AfterEntry of a Divorce Decree and EquitableDistribution Order. [Colagioia v. Colagioia, 362Pa. Super. 213, 523 A.2d 1158 (1987)]. 8:959-60.Court Upholds Validity of Antenuptial Agreement.[In Re: Estate of George W. Geyer, 338 Pa. Super.157, 487 A.2d 901 (1985)]. 6:724-28.Court Utilizes Equitable Powers <strong>to</strong> ImposeConstructive Trust on Insurance Proceeds.[Beamer v. Beamer, 330 Pa. Super. 154, 479 A.2d485 (1984)]. 5:603-5.Court Vacates Divorce Decree upon FindingExtrinsic Fraud. [Fenstermaker v. Fenstermaker,348 Pa. Super. 237, 502 A.2d 185 (1985)]. 7:813-16.Court's Equitable Distribution Order DividingState Pension Held Valid. [Graham v. Graham,416 Pa. Super. 118, 610 A.2d 999 (1990)].11:182.Court's Equitable Distribution of Property is notthat Equitable. [Rudick v. Rudick, LackawannaCo., 80 CW 4753 (1981)]. 2:207-10.Court's Ignoring a Petition for ReconsiderationDoesn't Make Wife Less "Appealing" on Merits.25
- Page 1 and 2: INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
- Page 5 and 6: Support-Guidelines ................
- Page 7: 13. Sidebar .......................
- Page 10 and 11: PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
- Page 12 and 13: 3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edit
- Page 14 and 15: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
- Page 16 and 17: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
- Page 18 and 19: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
- Page 20 and 21: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
- Page 22 and 23: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
- Page 24 and 25: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
- Page 26 and 27: CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
- Page 28 and 29: 3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
- Page 30 and 31: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
- Page 32 and 33: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
- Page 36 and 37: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
- Page 38 and 39: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
- Page 40 and 41: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
- Page 42 and 43: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee to Li
- Page 44 and 45: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
- Page 46 and 47: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
- Page 48 and 49: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
- Page 50 and 51: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
- Page 52 and 53: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
- Page 54 and 55: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
- Page 56 and 57: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
- Page 58 and 59: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
- Page 60 and 61: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
- Page 62 and 63: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 64 and 65: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 66 and 67: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
- Page 68 and 69: CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
- Page 70 and 71: C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
- Page 72 and 73: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
- Page 74 and 75: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
- Page 76 and 77: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
- Page 78 and 79: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
- Page 80 and 81: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
- Page 82 and 83: CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
- Page 84 and 85:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
- Page 86 and 87:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
- Page 88 and 89:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 90 and 91:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
- Page 92 and 93:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
- Page 94 and 95:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
- Page 96 and 97:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 98 and 99:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
- Page 100 and 101:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
- Page 102 and 103:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
- Page 104 and 105:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
- Page 106 and 107:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
- Page 108 and 109:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
- Page 110 and 111:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
- Page 112 and 113:
Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
- Page 114 and 115:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
- Page 116 and 117:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
- Page 118 and 119:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
- Page 120 and 121:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
- Page 122 and 123:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
- Page 124 and 125:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
- Page 126 and 127:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
- Page 128 and 129:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
- Page 130 and 131:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
- Page 132 and 133:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
- Page 134 and 135:
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
- Page 136 and 137:
Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
- Page 138 and 139:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
- Page 140 and 141:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
- Page 142 and 143:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLado
- Page 144 and 145:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
- Page 146 and 147:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
- Page 148 and 149:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
- Page 150 and 151:
5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
- Page 152 and 153:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
- Page 154 and 155:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
- Page 156 and 157:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
- Page 158 and 159:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETermi
- Page 160 and 161:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua
- Page 162 and 163:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
- Page 164 and 165:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQU
- Page 166 and 167:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
- Page 168 and 169:
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
- Page 170 and 171:
6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
- Page 172 and 173:
Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
- Page 174 and 175:
Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
- Page 176 and 177:
12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
- Page 178 and 179:
Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
- Page 180:
Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up