index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. Textor, 9 A.C.D.D. 116 (1987)]. 8:1008-9.In Support Action, Party's Domicile Continues untilNew Domicile is Affirmatively Proven. [McLarin v.McLarin, 350 Pa. Super. 153, 504 A.2d 291 (1986)].7:824-26.Local Rule Which Limits Right to a Hearing De NovoDeclared Invalid. [Warner v. Pollock, 434 Pa. Super.551, 644 A.2d 747 (1994)]. 16(4):9-10.Minimum Contacts: Personal Jurisdiction Reviewed.[Baronti v. Baronti, 381 Pa. Super. 134, 552 A.2d 1131(1989)]. 10(2):79.Personal Jurisdictional: Service of Process. [Ditzler v.Kameran, 384 Pa. Super. 184, 557 A.2d 1107 (1989)].10:93-94.SUPPORT–STOCK OPTIONSStock Options are Income for Support Purposes.[Mackinly v. Messerschmidt, 814 A.2d 680 (Pa. Super2002)]. Joseph P. Marton. 25:9-10.SUPPORT–SPOUSALRule 1910.16-4(E) Spousal Support Calculations WhenObligor is the Primary Custodian. [Diament v.Diament, 816 A.2d 256 (Pa Super.2003)]. Gerald L.Shoemaker, Jr. 25:73-76.SUPPORT–TAXATIONTax Consequences Must be Considered in SettingSupport Orders. [Reisinger v. Reisinger, 324 Pa. Super.223, 471 A.2d 544 (1984)]. 5:529-30.TAXATIONPa. Courts Empowered to Allocate DependencyExemptions. [Miller v. Miller, 744 A.2d 778 (Pa.Super. 1999)]. Debra Denison Cantor. 22:3-5.Tax Liability is Attributable to Year in Which Incomeis Earned in Determining Income Available forSupport. [Spahr v. Spahr, 869 A.2d 548 (Pa. Super.2005)]. Carolyn Moran Zack. 27:58-59.U.S. Court of Appeals Upheld Tax Court Ruling ThatUnallocated Pendente Lite Support Award was ProperlyDeductible as Alimony to Payor and Income to Payee.[Patricia Kean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue;Robert W. Kean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,rd407 F.3d 186 (3 Cir. 2005)]. Albert Shemtob. 27:117-18.TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGESLimited Testimony of Social Worker Allowed OverMother’s Objection. [In the Matter of L.F., Appeal ofL.W., 995 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Amy J.Phillips. 32:139-41.VISITATIONAnalysis of Grandparent Visitation Rights. [Johnson v.Diesinger, 404 Pa. Super. 41, 589 A.2d 1160 (1991)].12(4):8-9."Domino Effect" of Grandparent's Visits on Mother'sDepression and Her Treatment of Child Bars Themfrom Visitation. [Norris v. Tearney, 422 Pa. Super. 246,619 A.2d 339 (1993)]. 14(3):12-13.Father Denied Visitation Rights With Incapacitated 25-Year Old Daughter Pursuant to Her Wishes. [Estate of:Haertsch, Sr., Appeal of, 437 Pa. Super. 187, 649 A.2d719 (1994)]. 17(1):4.Father Imprisoned for His Child's Mother's Murder is"Barred" from Visiting Child. [Green v. Sneeringer,431 Pa. Super. 66, 635 A.2d 1074 (1993)]. 15(1):13-14.Grandparent Visitation Statute Regarding Children ofSeparated or Divorced Parents is Constitutional, Doesnot Violate Equal Protection Rights. [Schmehl v.Schmehl, 927 A. 2d 183 (Pa. 2007)]. Ann M. Funge.29:91-92.Grandparents Action for Visitation Dismissed WhereBoth Parents are Alive. [Herron v. Seizak, 321 Pa.Super. 466, 468 A.2d 803 (1983)]. 5:560-61.Grandparents Visitation Act Interpreted. [Bishop v.Piller, 536 Pa. 41, 637 A.2d 976 (1994)]. 15(2):2-3.Grandparent's Visitation Rights. [Bishop v. Piller, 399101