12.07.2015 Views

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECT<strong>to</strong> Equitable Distribution. 21:42-45.DIVORCE–PENSIONS ANDRETIREMENT PLANSAltschuler, Mark K. How <strong>to</strong> Determine a QDROAward Under Act 175. 31:62-64.Altschuler, Mark K. Past Payments. 30:12-14.Bloam, Brittany M. In Pennsylvania, ApparentlyDivorce Agreements are Sufficient <strong>to</strong> WaiveERISA Pension Plan Benefits. 31:110-12.Crain, Joan K. and Neil S. Brown. SpecialConsiderations for Retirement Plans DuringDivorce. 29:56-57.Eidelman, Mary J. B. and Mark K. Altschuler.Pension Valuation and Deferred DistributionUnder Act 175. 28:17-27.Vetrano, Kathleen B. and Sarinia A. Michaelson.New QDRO Costs <strong>to</strong> be Fac<strong>to</strong>red in DivorcePractice Pointer. 27:12-13.DIVORCE–TAXATIONBeaver, Becky, Rachel M. Baccari, LeeVanderburg, Haran Levy. Clash of Tax andDivorce Planning. 30:108-16.Crain, Joan K. and Richard C. Thomas. Divorceand <strong>the</strong> Key Nest Eggs: The Family Home andInvestment Portfolio. 30:163-65.Crain, Joan K. and Neil S. Brown. ReviewingEstate Plans in Connection With Divorce. 28:113-14.Crain, Joan K., Neil S. Brown & Richard C.Thomas. Tax Considerations When NegotiatingDivorce Settlements. 29:142-44.Frumkes, Melvyn B. A Divorce’s RetroactiveModification will not Change Taxability ofPayments. 29:26.Galzerano, Mark R. The Roth IRA Conversion.29:105-6.DISCOVERYGruener, Harry J. Discovery can be Taxing.18(2):22.Miles, Patricia A. Howett Appoints DiscoveryTask Force. 18(1):8-9.Supreme Court Authorizes Discovery. [R.C.P.1930.5(b)]. 19:42.Wettick, R. Stan<strong>to</strong>n, Jr. Introduc<strong>to</strong>ry Statement ofHonorable R. Stan<strong>to</strong>n Wettick, Jr. at <strong>the</strong>Pennsylvania Bar Association Family Law SectionToron<strong>to</strong> Meeting, July 12, 1996. 18(4):14-19.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTIONFeder, Robert D. Interest–An Unused Remedy.11:202-3.Glasser, Daniel H. Advances Against EquitableDistribution: Protecting <strong>the</strong> Advancing Party.20:46-48.Glasser, Daniel H. Response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Response.20:69.Howett, John C. Response <strong>to</strong> Daniel H. Glasser,“Advances Against EquitableDistribution–Protecting <strong>the</strong> Advancing Party.”20:67-69.Ladov, David L. and Michele Garrigan-Nass.Ano<strong>the</strong>r Piece of <strong>the</strong> Marital Pie: S<strong>to</strong>ck Options.9:52-53.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M., Judith A. Bretz, SusanJ. Beckert and Debra K. Lillie. EquitableDistribution: Mixed Assets. 19:13-14.Momjian, Mark. Lucky at Lot<strong>to</strong>, Unlucky at Love:Lottery Proceeds as a Fac<strong>to</strong>r in Support andEquitable Distribution Proceedings. 13(1):9-13.Mahood, James E. Early Retirement Incentives arenot Deferred Compensation. 20:18-20.153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!