index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-Old Adult Child With MedicalConditions not Considered Emancipated.[Kotzbauer v. Kotzbauer, 937 A.2d 487 (Pa.Super. 2007)]. Aaron P. Asher. 30:5-7.50/50 is not an Appropriate Starting Point. [Ruthv. Ruth, 67 Lancaster L. Rev. 461 (1981)]. 3:274-76.The 50/50 Starting Point. [Labuda v. Labuda, 349Pa. Super. 524, 503 A.2d 971 (1986)]. 7:808-10.201(d) Divorce–Separation Must be Related toMarital Discord. [Spitzkopf v. Spitzkopf, 3A.C.D.D. 42 (Allegh. Co., 1982)]. 3:337-38.Abatement of Divorce Action on Death. [Myers v.Myers, 379 Pa. Super. 450, 580 A.2d 384 (1990)].11:197.Absent Existing Pennsylvania Custody Order,Virginia Court had Jurisdiction Over Action byParent Who Failed to Return Child from Vacation.[Boudwin v. Boudwin, 419 Pa. Super. 570, 615A.2d 786 (1992)]. 14(2):10-11.An Accurate Inventory Prior to Trial may not Be.[Anderson v. Anderson, 822 A.2d 824 (Pa Super2003)]. Lori K. Shemtob. 25-66-67Act 62 is Applied Retroactively, the SuperiorCourt Declares. [Hecker v. O'Connell, 427 Pa.Super. 608, 629 A.2d 1036 (1993)]. 14(4):2.Adding Uncertainty to Uncertainty AboutCommon Law Marriage. [PNC Bank Corp. V.W.C.A.B (Stamos), 831 A.2d 1269 (Pa Cmwlth.2003)]. Robert E. Rains. 25:101-4.Administrative Error That Resulted in PrematureTermination of a Child Support Order May beCorrected Administratively as Well. [Castaldi v.Castaldi-Veloric, 993 A.2d 903 (Pa. Super.2010)]. Lesley J. Beam. 32:76-78.Affirmative Showing Required to have AdultChild Declared Incompetent. [In Re Estate ofHaertsch v. Haertsch, 415 Pa. Super. 598, 609A.2d 1384 (1992)]. 13(4):9-10.Agreed Support in Conjunction with PropertySettlement Agreement not Modifiable. [Nessa v.Nessa, 399 Pa. Super. 59, 581 A.2d 674 (1990)].11:194.Agreement on Child Support Binding. [Bell v.Bell, 390 Pa. Super. 526, 568 A.2d 1297 (1990)].Emanuel A. Bertin. 11:133.Agreement to Pay Post-Secondary EducationalExpenses is Valid & Binding. [Goss v. Timblin,424 Pa. Super. 216, 622 A.2d 347 (1993)].14(3):3-4.Agreements Which are Incorporated, But notMerged, are Non-Modifiable. [McGough v.McGough, 361 Pa. Super. 391, 522 A.2d 638(1987)]. 8:958-59.Alimony–Husband Ordered to Pay Wife Alimonyfor Indefinite Period of Time. [Orange v. Orange,Westmoreland Co., 5949 Civil 1980 (1981)].2:205-6.Alimony–Provisions of §501 are to be Read inConjunction With One Another. [Hess v. Hess,327 Pa. Super. 279, 475 A.2d 796 (1984)]. 5:576-579.Alimony–Section 501 Provisions to be Read inConjunction With One Another. [Bickley v.Bickley, 301 Pa. Super. 396, 447 A.2d 1025(1982)]. 3:302-306.Alimony Award and Standard of Living.[Edelstein v. Edelstein, 399 Pa. Super. 536, 582A.2d 1074 (1990)]. 12(1):2.Alimony Award Upheld to Effectuate 50-50Equitable Distribution Split. [Uhler v. Uhler, 406Pa. Super. 414, 594 A.2d 688 (1991)]. 12(5):5.Alimony in Accordance With Standard of Living.[Kutzer v. Kutzer, Montg. Co., No. 79-396(1982)]. 3:262-65.18