index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to the Lower Court’s Order. [J.P. v.S.P., 991 A.2d 904 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. LianeDavis Anderson. 32:80-82.The Application of the Doctrine of In CustodiaLegis to Protect Marital Property fromTax SaleDuring the Pendency of Equitable Distribution.[City of Easton v. Marra, 862 A.2d 170 (Pa.Commw. 2004)]. Christina M. DeMatteo. 27:8-9.Application to Proceed Under New Code–To GiveNo Recognition to a Counterclaim Filed Prior tothe Entry of a Divorce Decree Gives to theOpposing Party a Windfall that has NoRelationship to the Goals and Objectives of the1980 Code. [Conley v. Conley, 1 A.C.D.D. 162(Allegh. Co., 1981); Newby v. Newby, (MercerCo., 1135 C. D. 1980 (1981)]. 2:190-94.Attachment of Personal Injury/Workers’Compensation Awards to Satisfy Support Arrears.[Faust v. Walker, 945 A.2d 212 (Pa. Super.2008)]. Stephanie H. Winegrad. 30:83-84.Attachment of School Teacher's Pension. [Millickv. Millick, 140 Pa. Cmwlth. 252, 592 A.2d 788(1991)]. 12(4):3-4.Attachment of Wages: An Analysis. [Wilcox v.Wilcox, 394 Pa. Super. 119, 575 A.2d 127(1990)]. 11:159-60.An Attorney Held in Contempt and Directed toReturn Appointment Fees Prevails on Appeal.Melaine Shannon Rothey. 31:8-10.Attorney's Lien on Marital Residence. [Jaywork v.Jaywork, 378 Pa. Super. 89, 548 A.2d 290(1988)]. 9:51.Attorney's Counsel Fee Claim. [Damiano v.Damiano, 378 Pa. Super. 106, 548 A.2d 298(1988)]. 9:50-51.Award of Preliminary Counsel Fees and Expensesis Interlocutory. [Grippo v. Grippo, No. 3360 of1978 consolidated at No. 177 of 1980 (1984)].4:468-69.Award of Primary Custody to Non-biologicalMother of Former Lesbian Couple. [Jones v.Jones, 884 A.2d 915 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. Cathy M.Cardozo. 28:7-8.Award of Specific Performance: UniqueCircumstances Only. [Lower v. Lower, 401 Pa.Super. 158, 584 A.2d 1028 (1991)]. 12(2):3.Balicki: Tax Ramifications and Costs in EquitableDistribution. [Balicki v. Balicki, 4 A.3d 654 (Pa.Super. 2010)]. Michael E. Bertin. 32:195-96.Bankruptcy: Non-Dischargeability of SupportObligation. [Deichert v. Deichert, 402 Pa. Super.415, 587 A.2d 319 (1991)]. 12(3):2-4.Bankruptcy Discharge of Property SettlementAgreement Equitable Distribution ObligationsConfirmed by the State Court. [Hogg v. Hogg, 816A.2d 314 (Pa Super.2003)]. Kilbreth E. Barton-Rhea. 25:68-69.Base All Orders for Support on Specific IncomeFindings. [Dalessandro v. Dalessandro, 366 Pa.Super. 479, 531 A.2d 518 (1987]. 9(1):4.The Battle of the County SupportGuidelines–Which County Should be Used?[Szillery v. Wheaton, 382 Pa. Super. 394, 555A.2d 237 (1989)]. 10(2):80.Berrington Held Applicable to Defined BenefitPlan in Immediate offset Case–Early RetirementIncentives Offered Post-Separation Excluded fromMarital Estate. [Gordon v. Gordon, 545 Pa. 391,681 A.2d 732 (1996)]. Susan J. Beckert. 18(4):10-12.Berrington v. Berrington and Katzenberger v.Katzenberger. [Berrington v. Berrington, 409 Pa.Super. 355, 598 A.2d 31 (1991); Katzenberger v.Katzenberger, 534 Pa. 419, 633 A.2d 602 (1991)].12(5):2-3.Berrington & Brown in a Nutshell. [Berrington v.Berrington, 534 Pa. Super. 393, 633 A.2d 589(1993); Brown v. Brown, 447 Pa. Super. 424, 669A.2d 969 (1995)]. Brian C. Vertz. 18(2):13-14.Best Interest of the Child Paramount in Denial of20