ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTEQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION–BUSINESSGaffen, Gregg S. Evaluating <strong>the</strong> Expertise andCredentials of Business Valuation Practitioners.25:34-40.Garland, Pamela J. and Ashley L. Reilly. Discountfor Lack of Voting Rights/Premium for VotingRights Study. 26:67-83.Roosma, Jacob P. C Corporations withAppreciated Assets: Valuation Discount for Built-In Capital Gains. 25:15-20.Van Vleet, Daniel R. The Valuation of SCorporation S<strong>to</strong>ck. 25:25-33.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION–GOODWILLAltschuler, Kenneth P., Hesper Schleiderer-Hardy,Jay Sanders. Determining and Evaluating Personaland Enterprise Goodwill in <strong>the</strong> Divorce Case.30:166-73.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION–PENSIONS & RETIREMENT ASSETSAltschuler, Mark and To<strong>by</strong> Dickman. EarlyRetirement Window Enhancements and Divorce.20:44-45.Altschuler, Mark K and Jeffrey M. Williams. TheDemarco Case and Delayed Retirement. 24:51-52.Altschuler, Mark K. Formula Enhancements <strong>to</strong> aDefined Benefit Pension: Berring<strong>to</strong>n, Brown,Gordon, and Meyer. 23:39-41.Ash<strong>to</strong>n, Mark R. Settlement Strategies: When DueDiligence can be Dangerous. 22:43-44.Auerbach, Julie and Mark K. Altschuler. ThePalladino Conundrum Unraveled. 21:14-15.Blechman, Jay A. Brown v. Brown: More onDeferred Distribution of Pension Benefits inEquitable Distribution. 18(2):15-16.Edelson, Gary. Qualified Domestic RelationsOrders–When can <strong>the</strong> Alternative Payee GetControl of Her Money. 9:9.Mahood, James E. Reading Between <strong>the</strong> Lines:The Supreme Court's Decision in Gordon v.Gordon. 18(4):12-14.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Don't Let Your ClientShoot Himself in <strong>the</strong> Foot. 12(5):9-11.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine. Pension Valuation Issues.11:189-91.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Retirement AgeArguments. 12(3):11-14.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine S. Millick v. Millick: A Spur<strong>to</strong> Pension Reform, not a Reason for Applause.12(5):14-15.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Standard of Practice forPension Valuation Adoption. 22:44-46.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Stay Now, Pay Later.14(1):10-11.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. There is No Such Thingas an Accrued Benefit (Or Why CovertureFractions Make Sense). 12(3):14-16.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. U.S. Supreme CourtIdentifies Pension Issues: Kennedy & ProgenyPost-Decision Guidance. 31:107-10.Miller, Patricia G. A Conversation With My CatAbout Pension/Double-Dip Issues. 30:90-91.Miller, Patricia G. Gordon v. Gordon: AnythingNew on Coverture Fractions? 16(4):19-20.Miller, Patricia G. Holland v. Holland: AnAssortment of Post-Separation Eggs in <strong>the</strong> MaritalProperty Basket. 12(4):13-14.Miller, Patricia G. McFadden v. McFadden: ADouble Dip at <strong>the</strong> Pension Well. 10:110-11.Miller, Patricia G. Palladino: "A Chinese Menu"Approach Leads <strong>to</strong> an Illogical Result. 20:65-67.Miller, Patricia G. Schneeman v. Schneeman:154
ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTCornbleth Revisited–Or How <strong>to</strong> Make aConfusing Decision Worse. 14(2):17.Miller, Patricia G. and Dodi Walker Gross.Stinner v. Stinner: Who Decides When a CourtOrder Qualifies as a Qualified Domestic RelationsOrder? 10:82-84.Miller, Patricia G. Yes, Virginia, There is Such aThing as an Accrued Benefit. 12(4):14-15.Serine, Charles K. Public Pension Funds andApproved Domestic Relations Orders. 21:45-65.Shah, Barbara J. Hayward v. OPM–QualifyingOrders on Civil Service Retirement SystemPensions. 31:170-72.Sipos, Lawrence J. Valuation of Survivor Benefitfor Purposes of Equitable Distribution–Guidancefor Practitioners in <strong>the</strong> Post-Palladino Era. 21:15-16.Snyder, Bradley Z. Drafting a DRO for SERS andPSERs. 14(3):14-15.Snyder, Marvin. Comments on Pension ValuationProcedures in Divorce in Accord WithPennsylvania Superior Court Opinion in Aga<strong>to</strong>ne.10:84.Snyder, Marvin. Letter <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Edi<strong>to</strong>r: ReMcFadden Pension Article. 12(4):15.Snyder, Marvin. Pennsylvania Supreme CourtDefines Divorce Pension Rights. 15(1):17.Snyder, Marvin. Pension Valuations WithInflation and Taxation. 9:40-41.Snyder, Marvin. Superior Court Finds a NewMethod <strong>to</strong> Allocate Marital Property in a DefinedContribution Plan. 17(1):15-16.Snyder, Marvin. Two Recent Superior CourtCases on Pensions in Divorce. 11:188.Snyder, Marvin. (What) Pension is MaritalProperty. 12(5):8.Troyan, William M. Curriculum Vitae. 6:680-682.Troyan, William M. Drafting and Qualifying aCourt Order in a Domestic Relations Case. 7:896-900.Troyan, William M. Evaluation of QualifiedBenefit Plans as a Result of <strong>the</strong> Berringer andKatzenberger Decisions. 13(5):8-14.Troyan, William M. The Retirement Equity Actand Pension Evaluation. 6:682-690.Vetrano, Anthony J. The Marital Portion ofDefined Benefit Pension Plans: How is it <strong>to</strong> beDetermined? 18(2):16-19.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION–STOCK OPTIONSBarenbaum, Les and Lunney, Brian G. Views onFisher v. Fisher, 769 A.2d 1165 (Pa. 2001)–S<strong>to</strong>ckOptions. 23:74-76.EQUITABLEDISTRIBUTION–VALUATIONBarenbaum, Les and Bonnie O'Rourke. Analyzingand Quantifying Sweat Equity. 18(1):12-13.Barenbaum, Lester. Executive S<strong>to</strong>ck OptionsValuation Issues. 20:16-17.Egler, Joseph M. and Edward A. Wilusz. The Sizeof <strong>the</strong> Marketability Discounts in AppraisingClosely Held Businesses. 18(1):13-14.Egler, Joseph M. and Andrew M. Wilusz. ValuingEmployee S<strong>to</strong>ck Options. 19:81-82.Ladov, David L. and Kenneth Spiegel. ValuingMarital Assets After Sutliff. 11:148.McFadden, Ca<strong>the</strong>rine M. Valuing and DistributingIncreases and Decreases. 15(2):13-15.McSorley, Anne and Geoff Anders. MedicalPractice Valuation: Why and How. 9:59-60.155
- Page 1 and 2:
INDEXTO THEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY LAWY
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
- Page 5 and 6:
Support-Guidelines ................
- Page 7:
13. Sidebar .......................
- Page 10 and 11:
PREFACEPeriodicals serve an importa
- Page 12 and 13:
3. CASE DIGESTSLadov, David L, Edit
- Page 14 and 15:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSProvision in
- Page 16 and 17:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORS1997)]. 19:5
- Page 18 and 19:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSFunge, Ann M
- Page 20 and 21:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSInitial Cust
- Page 22 and 23:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSMcKillop, Do
- Page 24 and 25:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)
- Page 26 and 27:
CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSReaches Age
- Page 28 and 29:
3 B. CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE19-Year-O
- Page 30 and 31:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEObjections to
- Page 32 and 33:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEBuy-Out Remedy
- Page 34 and 35:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 36 and 37:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE[Waddington v.
- Page 38 and 39:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEIrretrievable
- Page 40 and 41:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEquitable Dist
- Page 42 and 43:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEmployee to Li
- Page 44 and 45:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuper. 2007)].
- Page 46 and 47:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's
- Page 48 and 49:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Whi
- Page 50 and 51:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEMeaning of Ann
- Page 52 and 53:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEParties can Ob
- Page 54 and 55:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distri
- Page 56 and 57:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEModification.
- Page 58 and 59:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE386 A. 2d 129
- Page 60 and 61:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEof His Paramou
- Page 62 and 63:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 64 and 65:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLESuperior Court
- Page 66 and 67:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE27:58-59.Tempo
- Page 68 and 69:
CASE DIGESTS BY TITLE(Pa. Super. 20
- Page 70 and 71:
C ASE D IGESTS BY T ITLEEstate of B
- Page 72 and 73:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPhillips. 32
- Page 74 and 75:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTATTORNEYS FE
- Page 76 and 77:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT663 A.2d 768
- Page 78 and 79:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT31:15-18.Pen
- Page 80 and 81:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTv. L.R.M., 7
- Page 82 and 83:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTSuper. 461,
- Page 84 and 85:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPa. Super. 3
- Page 86 and 87:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT10(2):80-81.
- Page 88 and 89:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 90 and 91:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDebts. [Gran
- Page 92 and 93:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTDeath Abates
- Page 94 and 95:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[(Haentjens
- Page 96 and 97:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTEquitable Di
- Page 98 and 99:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTPornography
- Page 100 and 101:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECT[McConnell v
- Page 102 and 103:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTFinal Divorc
- Page 104 and 105:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTIn Loco Pare
- Page 106 and 107:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTReasonable P
- Page 108 and 109:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTUnauthorized
- Page 110 and 111:
CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTGuidelines D
- Page 112 and 113:
Pa. Super. 52, 581 A.2d 670 (1990)]
- Page 114 and 115: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDBarrone v. B
- Page 116 and 117: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDCalabrese v.
- Page 118 and 119: TABLE OF CASES REPORTED470 A.2d 995
- Page 120 and 121: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDFratangelo v
- Page 122 and 123: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDHollman v. H
- Page 124 and 125: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDIn the Inter
- Page 126 and 127: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDLampus v. Es
- Page 128 and 129: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDMcGinn v. Mc
- Page 130 and 131: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDOrange v. Or
- Page 132 and 133: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDRoussos v. R
- Page 134 and 135: TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDSteenland-Pa
- Page 136 and 137: Wolk v. Wolk, 318 Pa. Super. 311, 4
- Page 138 and 139: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHOR18(1
- Page 140 and 141: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORMatr
- Page 142 and 143: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORLado
- Page 144 and 145: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORAbou
- Page 146 and 147: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORRobe
- Page 148 and 149: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORVoss
- Page 150 and 151: 5B. ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEA
- Page 152 and 153: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEKenne
- Page 154 and 155: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEHow t
- Page 156 and 157: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLEPermi
- Page 158 and 159: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY TITLETermi
- Page 160 and 161: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTSua
- Page 162 and 163: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTImm
- Page 166 and 167: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTPol
- Page 168 and 169: ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY SUBJECTMcF
- Page 170 and 171: 6. FEDERAL/MILITARY CORNER.Sullivan
- Page 172 and 173: Grunfeld, David I. Pennsylvania Fam
- Page 174 and 175: Mahood, James E. and Gary M. Gilman
- Page 176 and 177: 12. SECTION NEWSSteiner, William L.
- Page 178 and 179: Judge Strassburger’s Rejoinder. 2
- Page 180: Montgomery Bar Initiative Cheers Up