index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEEither Party's Contributions is Marital Property.[Pascoe v. Pascoe, 7 A.C.D.D. 51 (Allegh. Co.,1984)]. 6:719-22.Increase in Value of Premarital Property is MaritalProperty. [Anthony v. Anthony, Tompkins v.Tompkins, 355 Pa. Super. 589, 514 A.2d 91 2(1986)]. 7:884-92.Increase in Value of Separate PropertyAttributable to Marital Contributions is MaritalProperty. [Birkel v. Birkel, 3 A.C.D.D. 230(Allegh. Co., 1982)]. 4:436-38.Increased Earnings Capacity is Neither Real NorPersonal Property. [Hodge v. Hodge, 327 Pa.Super. 151, 486 A.2d 401 (1984)]. 6:668-73.Indemnification Provision for Child SupportLiability is Unenforceable and Against PublicPolicy. [Frank v. Miesen, 361 Pa. Super. 204, 522A.2d 85 (1987)]. 8:957-58.Indigency: Trial Transcript Expense. [Morrison v.Miller, 397 Pa. Super. 153, 579 A.2d 976 (1990)].11:187-88.Ineffectiveness of Counsel: Dependency Hearing.[In The Matter of Jonna Price, 393 Pa. Super. 1,573 A.2d 1057 (1990)]. 11:146-47.Inheritance does not Equate to Income for SupportPurposes. [Humphries v. DeRoss, 790 A.2d 281(Pa. 2002)]. Elisabeth Pride. 24:32-34.Injunctive Relief Under Section 401(c) of theDivorce Code. [Lazovitz v. Lazovitz, 307 Pa.Super. 341, 453 A.2d 615 (1982)]. 4:391-93.Inmate's Right to Attend Bifurcation Hearing.[Salemo v. Salemo, 381 Pa. Super. 632, 554 A.2d563 (1989)]. 10(2):80-81.An Interim Award of Counsel Fees is HeldInterlocutory and Therefore not Appealable. [Lanev. Lane, Montg. Co., No. 80-11175, In Divorce,A.V.M., (August 14, 1981); Walters v. Walters,109 Montg. Co. L. Rep. 466 (1981)]. 3:265-69.Interim Custody Order and Status Quo not ControlSubsequent School Year School DistrictDetermination. [Fox v. Garzilli, 875 A.2d 1104(Pa. Super. 2005)]. Pamela L. Purdy. 27:118-20.Interlocutory Order for APL/Spousal Support isUnappealable Within 30 Days of the Entry of theFinal Decree in Divorce or Annulment. [Costlowv. Costlow, 914 A.2d 440 (Pa. Super. 2006)].Jennifer A. Brandt. 29:14-15.Interplay: PKPA and UCCJA. [Barndt v. Barndt,397 Pa. Super. 321, 580 A.2d 320 (1990)].11:185-87.Interpretation of the Barletta Decision. [Ryan v.Ryan, 528 Pa. 186, 596 A.2d 140 (1991)].12(6):3-4.Interspousal Gifts are Marital Property. [Semasekv. Semasek, 331 Pa. Super. 1, 479 A.2d 1047(1984)]. 5:624-30.Interspousal Gifts are not Marital Property.[Semasek v. Semasek, 509 Pa. 282, 502 A.2d 109(1984)]. 6:775-77.Intrastate Custody Relocation in Absence of PriorCustody Order. [Beers v. Beers, 710 A.2d 1206(Pa. Super. 1998)]. 20:35-38.Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights: CourtAdopts "Clear And Convincing Evidence"Standard. [Petition for Involuntary Termination ofParental Rights, Appeal of G.J.A, 304 Pa. Super.21, 450 A.2d 80 (1982)]. 3:361-62.Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights DeniedWhen Natural Parent Maintains Substantial AndContinuing Contact Prior to the Filed Petition,Superior Court Declares. [T.J.B. v. E.C., 438 Pa.Super. 529, 652 A.2d 936 (1995); In Re: Adoptionof M.J.C., 438 Pa. Super. 529, 652 A.2d 936(1995)]. 17(2):9-12.Involuntary Termination of ParentalRights–Father's Attempt to Overcome. [InRe:Baby Boy H., 401 Pa. Super. 530, 585 A.2d1054 (1991)]. 12(3):10-11.Is 50/50 an Appropriate Starting Point? Wife36