12.07.2015 Views

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARTICLES AND COMMENTS BY AUTHORGlasser, Daniel H. Advances Against EquitableDistribution: Protecting <strong>the</strong> AdvancingParty. 20:46-48.Glasser, Daniel H. Response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Response.20:69.Glasser, Daniel H. Solomonic Resolution ofCus<strong>to</strong>dy Case–Israeli Style. 20:97-98.Gold-Bikin, Lynne Z. "Relocation" Now hasGuidelines. 12(2):8.Greenbaum, Jeffrey and Ken Kilimnik.*International Enforcement of Family Support: TheView from Pennsylvania. 9:55-59.Grinberg, Edwin I. Permission Slip. 29:103-5.Gross, Dodi Walker and Miller, Patricia G.*Stinner v. Stinner: Who Decides When a CourtOrder Qualifies as a Qualified Domestic RelationsOrder? 10:82-84.Gruener, Harry J. Close <strong>the</strong> Door on OpenAdoptions. 18(3):18-19.Gruener, Harry J. Discovery can be Taxing.18(2):22.Gruener, Harry J. Nothing Personal. 19:20.Gruener, Harry J. An Uncommon Law MarriageCase. 20:94-95.Grunfeld, David L. Caution: Sex With Clients.27:123-24.Grunfeld, David L. Family Law and <strong>the</strong> NewBankruptcy Code. Amendments . 17(1):16.Hitzemann, Diane D. Collaborative Practice–AChoice for Families. 29:24-25.Hofstein, David N.* and Kevin C. McCullough.Contingent Fees in Domestic Relations Matters.9:37-39.Hofstein, David N. Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Litigation—The Roleof <strong>the</strong> Child. 20:10-14.Hofstein, David N. and Joanne Ross Wilder.*PBA Opinion Re: Inquiry #95-134 (Revised7/31/96). 20:14-15.Hofstein, David N. Stipulation for Cus<strong>to</strong>dyEvaluation. 21:129-130.Hostetter, David L.* and Wm. H. Nast.Applicability of 1988 Divorce Code Amendments<strong>to</strong> Pending Cases and Causes of Action AccruingPrior <strong>to</strong> Their Effective Date. 9:23-26.Howett, John C., Jr. A Practical View of <strong>the</strong> Effec<strong>to</strong>f <strong>the</strong> 1988 Divorce Code Amendments onPending Cases. 9:26-28.Howett, John C. Response <strong>to</strong> Daniel H. Glasser,“Advances Against EquitableDistribution–Protecting <strong>the</strong> Advancing Party.”.20:67-69.Jones, Daniel* and Tracy Stewart. What Does <strong>the</strong>Healthcare Reform Bill Mean for DivorcingCouples? <strong>32</strong>:163-64.Jones, G. Daniel* and Joseph McCaffrey. CapitalGain & “Principal Residence” Capital GainChange–Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. 20:20-22.Jones, G. Daniel. Federal Income Taxes. 24:46-50.Kennedy, G. William. Dissecting BusinessValuation Report. 30:100-6.Kilimnik, Ken* and Jeffrey Greenbaum.International Enforcement of Family Support: TheView from Pennsylvania. 9:55-59.Kindler, Alex M.* Greg Voss, and Reid B.Roberts. It is Time <strong>to</strong> Revisit Hovis. 21:12-13.King, Mark. Comment: ‘Qualified Professional.’.29:23-24.Klein, Howard B. What <strong>to</strong> do When <strong>the</strong> IRSAgents Come Calling. 20:48-49.131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!