index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTOne Night Stand does not Toll Separation Period.[Sadlek v. Sadlek, 4 A.C.D.D. 64, 131 P.L.J. 419(1983)]. 4:449-50.Physical Separation Alone Without Intent of One Partyto Dissolve Marriage Insufficient to Establish Groundsfor Divorce. [Sinha v. Sinha, 515 Pa. 14, 526 A.2d 765(1987)]. 8:997-99.Regular Visits do not Defeat Separate and Apart ClaimWhere Parties Reside in Separate Residence. [Taylor v.Taylor, 1 A.C.D.D. 82 (Allegh. 1981)]. 2:202-5.Section 201(d) Divorce–Must Allege Three YearSeparate and Apart in Complaint. [Creach v. Creach,361 Pa. Super. 482, 522 A.2d 1133 (1987)]. 8:970-972.Separate and Apart Means Separate Residences.[Williams v. Williams, 31 Chester Co. L. R. 82 (1982)].4:458-60.Separate and Apart: Sexual Relations does not TollSeparation Period. [Oatman v. Oatman, Erie Co., 599a of 1981 (1982)]. 4:400.Separation Agreement–Effect of Merger vs.Incorporation. [Millstein v. Millstein, 311 Pa. Super.495, 457 A.2d 1291 (1983)]. 4:432-35.Sexual Relations do not Necessarily Toll Three YearSeparate and Apart Period. [Thomas v. Thomas, 335Pa. Super. 41, 483 A.2d 945 (1984)]. 5:648-50.DIVORCE–TAXATIONTax Consequences of Alimony Payments ContinuedAfter Remarriage of Former Spouse. [Sherwood v.Commissioner, 38 T.C.M. 1979-149 (1979)]. 2:135-36.Tax Consequences–Relevant Factor to be Consideredin Making Alimony Pendente Lite Award. [Reisinger v.Reisinger, 3 A.C.D.D. 65 (1982)]. 3:335-36.Tax Impact Must be Considered in EquitableDistribution Award. [White v. White, 382 Pa. Super.478, 555 A.2d 1299 (1989) 10(2):76.DIVORCE–THIRD PARTIESThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overrules the WolfCase. [Buskirk v. Buskirk, 378 Pa. Super. 418, 548A.2d 1270 (1991)]. 12(4):2-3.Pre-Existing Funds Contributed by Wife toImprovements on Home Owned by In-laws do notConstitute Consideration Which Would Create aProprietary Interest in the Home. [Bolze v. Bolze, 427Pa. Super. 599, 629 A.2d 1031 (1993)]. 14(5):4.EMANCIPATED MINORS19-Year-Old Adult Child With Medical Conditions notConsidered Emancipated. Aaron P. Asher. [Kotzbauerv. Kotzbauer, 937 A.2d 487 (Pa. Super. 2007)]. 30:5-7.Emancipation and the Troubled Child. [Trosky v.Mann, 398 Pa. Super. 369, 581 A.2d 177 (1990)].11:198-99.Superior Court Declares No Retroactive Credit forChild Support on Behalf of Emancipated Minor.[Holcomb v. Holcomb, 448 Pa. Super. 154, 670 A.2d1155 (1996)]. David L. Ladov. 18(3):5-6Superior Court Declares that an Emancipated MinorChild may be Re-declared Dependant andUnemancipated. [Berks County Children and YouthServices v. Rowan, 428 Pa. Super. 448, 631 A.2d 615(1992)]. 15(1):6-8.EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION50/50 Is not an Appropriate Starting Point. [Ruth v.Ruth, 67 Lancaster L. Rev. 461 (1981)]. 3:274-76.An Accurate Inventory Prior to Trial may not Be.[Anderson v. Anderson, 822 A.2d 824 (Pa Super2003)]. Lori K. Shemtob. 25-66-67.[The Constitutionality of Equitable Distribution.].[Bacchetta v. Bacchetta, 29 Chester Co. L. Rep. 167(1981)]. 2:154-55.Court Awards Value at Date of Marriage of Pre-MaritalHome to Party Who Brought to Marriage. [Durham v.Durham, A.C.D.D. ]. 5:636-37.Court's Equitable Distribution of Property is not thatEquitable. [Rudick v. Rudick, Lackawanna Co., 80 Cw4753 (1981)]. 2:207-10.81