index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLEPension Distribution: Credits Earned AfterSeparation. [Holland v. Holland, 403 Pa. Super.116, 588 A.2d 58 (1991)]. 12(3):6-7.Pension Distribution Follows Berrington Analysis.[Katzenberger v. Katzenberger, 534 Pa. 419, 633A.2d 602 (1993)]. 15(1):5.Pension Payment not Attachable to SatisfyArrearages Due and Owing Under SupportAgreement. [Hollman v. Hollman, 511 Pa. Super.362, 513 A.2d 1380 4 (1986)]. 7:796-802.Pension Plans Acquired During Marriage areMarital Property. [King v. King, 22 Erie Co. L. J.46 (1982)]. 4:422-26.Pension Valuation Case. [King v. King, 332 Pa.Super. 526, 481 A.2d 913 (1984)]. 5:643-45.Pension Valuation: Equitable Distribution.[Zollars v. Zollars, 397 Pa. Super. 204, 579 A.2d1328 (1990)]. 11:194-95.Pensions, Vested or Non-Vested, Matured orUnmatured, are Marital Property. [Braderman v.Braderman, 339 Pa. Super. 185, 488 A.2d 613(1985)]. 6:716-19.Perpetrator of Child Abuse: Omissions areEnough. [K.S. v. Com. of Pa., Dept. of PublicWelfare, 129 Pa. Cmwlth. 31, 564 A.2d 561(1989)]. 10:125-26.Person may Only Have One "Bona Fide"Residence Or Domicile. [Stipp v. Stipp, 31Chester Co. L. R. 172 (1983)]. 4:483-84.Personal Jurisdictional: Service of Process.[Ditzler v. Kameran, 384 Pa. Super. 184, 557 A.2d1107 (1989)]. 10:93-94.PFA Statute Applies to Abuse Between Child’sMother and Paternal Grandfather. [DeBoer v.Slusser, 985 A.2d 974 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. AndrewD. Taylor. 32:17.Physical Separation Alone Without Intent of OneParty to Dissolve Marriage Insufficient toEstablish Grounds for Divorce. [Sinha v. Sinha,515 Pa. 14, 526 A.2d 765 (1987)]. 8:997-99.Police Department Pension is not Subject toAttachment Pursuant to Equitable DistributionOrder. [Young v. Young, 320 Pa. Super. 269, 467A.2d 33 (1983)]. 4:481-83.Postnuptial Agreement Subject to SimeoneRequirements. [Mormello v. Mormello, 452 Pa.Super. 590, 682 A.2d 824 (1996)]. Gary J.Friedlander. 19:6-8.Post-Divorce Increase in Pension Subject toDivision. [Smith v. Boulding, 938 A.2d 276 (Pa.2007)]. Catherine McFadden. 30:76-79.Post-Separation Act 9 Enhancements to MaritalState Employee Retirement System BenefitsFound not to Constitute Marital Property Undernew Section 3501(c)(1) of the Divorce Code.[Smith v. Smith, 881 A.2d 855 (Pa. Super. 2005)].Darren J. Holst. 28:3-5.Post-Separation Increases in Value of NonmaritalAssets: The Line Grows Brighter. [Litmans v.Litmans, 449 Pa. Super. 209, 673 A.2d 382(1996)]. David L. Ladov. 18(3):7-8.Post-Separation Increase in Value of ProfessionalPractice Qualifies as Marital Property Subject toEquitable Distribution. [Goldblum v. Goldblum,416 Pa. Super. 438, 611 A.2d 296 (1992)]. 13(5):2-3.Postseparation Interest and Dividends Earned onNonmarital Bequest is not in Marital Pot. [Ling v.Ling, 442 Pa. Super. 106, 659 A.2d 805 (1995).David L. Ladov. 18(1):7.Post-Separation Retirement Benefits–AfterBerrington. [Brown v. Brown, 447 Pa. Super. 424,669 A.2d 969 (1995)]. Maria P. Cognetti.18(2):11-13.Potential Tax Liability: Equitable DistributionAward. [Hovis v. Hovis, 518 Pa. 137, 541 A.2d13478 (1988)]. 9:20-21.Pre-Divorce Code Ante-Nuptial Agreement BarsWife's Claims to Equitable Distribution. [Stern v.44