index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLERuling fromPA Superior Court Determines WhenStock Options Constitute Marital Property.[MacAleer v. MacAleer, 725 A.2d 829 (Pa. Super.1999)]. David J. Draganosky. 21:38-40.Same Sex Domestic Partner’s in Loco ParentisStanding Carries a Child Support Obligation.[L.S.K. v. H.A.N., 813 A.2d 872 (Pa. Super.2002)]. Margaret T. Lucas and H. William White,III. 25:12-13.Sanctity of Pre-Nuptial Agreements Upheld. [Gulav. Gula, 380 Pa. Super. 249, 551 A.2d 324(1998)]. 10:64.Satisfaction of Proven Reasonable Needs, notEqualization of Income, Is Polestar forDetermining Monthly Alimony Amount.[Dalrymple v. Kilishek, 920 A.2d 1275 (Pa. Super.2006)]. Darren J. Holst. 29:51-52.Second Parent Adoption: Supreme Court Puts Endto “Absurdity.” [In Re: Adoption of R.B.F. andR.C.F., Appeal of B.A.F. and C.H.F. (LancasterCounty), 803 A.2d 1195 (Pa. 2002), In Re:Adoption of C.C.G. and Z.C.G., Appeal of J.C.Gand J.J.G. (Erie County), 803 A.2d 1195 (Pa.2002)]. Daniel J. Clifford. 24:105-6.Section 201(d) Divorce–Court Need not GiveParty Notice Before Entering Divorce Decree.[Kopf v. Kopf, 2 A.C.D.D. 87(Allegh. Co.,1982)]. 3:322-323.Section 201(d) Divorce–Must Allege Three YearSeparate And Apart In Complaint. [Creach v.Creach, 361 Pa. Super. 482, 522 A.2d 1133(1987)]. 8:970-972.Section 505 Applies Only to Foreign Ex ParteDivorces. [Sohmer v. Sohmer, 318 Pa. Super. 500,465 A.2d 665 (1983)]. 4:465-66.Section 501(f) of Divorce Code PermitsEnforcement of Support Obligations Made Subjectto a Consent Decree Under §503 of Divorce Code.[Hopkinson v. Hopkinson, 112 Montg. Co. L. Rep.351 (1983)]. 4:490.Seizing of Personal Settlement Proceeds Permittedfor Child Support Enforcement. [Campbell v.Walker; Appeal of: Department of Public Welfare982 A.2d 1013 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. Christine Gale.32:5-7.Self-Created Economic Hardship SabotagesColonna Support Deviation Request. [Saunders v.Saunders, 908 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. 2006)].Darren J. Holst. 29:3-5.Sensitivity is Paramount in Fight Over Child’sRemains. [Kulp v. Kulp, 920 A.2d 867 (Pa. Super.2007)]. Michael E. Bertin.29:49-51.Separate and Apart Means Separate Residences.[Williams v. Williams, 31 Chester Co. L. R. 82(1982)]. 4:458-60.Separate and Apart: Sexual Relations does notToll Separation Period. [Oatman v. Oatman, ErieCo., 599 A of 1981 (1982)]. 4:400.Separation Agreement–Effect of Merger vs.Incorporation. [Millstein v. Millstein, 311 Pa.Super. 495, 457 A.2d 1291 (1983)]. 4:432-435.Separation Date Value Used in ValuingProfessional Practice. [Oppenheim v. Oppenheim,Lehigh Co., 81-C-3083 (June 21, 1989)]. 10:89.Separation Period Under §201(d) Need not be aVoluntary Decision. [McBride v. McBride, 335Pa. Super. 296, 484 A.2d 141 (1984)]. 6:697-98.Settlement Proceeds: Equitable Distribution.[Kozich v. Kozich, 397 Pa. Super. 463, 580 A.2d390 (1990)]. 11:200.“Seven Year Ache" of Missing Spouse may beCured Without Petition of Surviving Spouse toDeclare Death. [Cann v. Cann, 429 Pa. Super. 234,632 A.2d 322 (1993)]. 15(1):14-15.A Severance Payment and Distribution of anAccural Account Income for Support or Assets forEquitable Distribution? [Berry v. Berry, 898 A.2d.1100 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. David C. Schanbacher.28:102-4.Sexual Abuser Appeals Dependency Adjudication49