index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY AUTHORSSuper. 2010)]. 32:139-41.Pollock, David S. Allocation of APL and ChildSupport–Split Custody–Complex Support CaseWith Compounding Complexities. [Holland v.Holland, 444 Pa. Super. 251, 663 A.2d 768(1995)]. 18(2):7-9.Pollock, David S. Bifurcated Divorce Decree is aFinal Appealable Order. [Curran v. Curran, 446Pa. Super. 633, 667 A.2d 1155 (1995)]. 18(2):6-7.Pollock, David S. Equitable Distribution by theInch. [Anzalone v. Anzalone, 835 A.2d 773 (PaSuper. 2003)]. 25:96-99.Pollock, David S. Gruber Analysis Applied toInter-County Case. [Bednarek v. Velazquez, 830A.2d 1267 (Pa Super.2003)]. 25:99-100.Ponzio, Sarah N. Reunification vs. Adoption–Whose Interests are Really Served? [In the Interestof R.J.T., Minor; Appeal of: Allegheny CountyOffice of Children, Youth and Families. In ReR.J.T. 990 A.2d 777 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. 32:72-75.Pride, Elisabeth. Inheritance does not Equate toIncome for Support Purposes. [Humphries v.DeRoss, 790 A.2d 281 (Pa. 2002)]. 32-34.Pritchard, Jessica A. Mother Maintained PrimaryCustody Despite Her Placement of Child inPrivate Boarding School. [A.O. v. M.O., 856 A.2d1204 (2004)]. 26:110-11.Purdy, Pamela L. Father Convicted of First DegreeMurder and Serving Life Term Entitled toEvaluation and Treatment to Custody Case.[Cramer v. Zgela, 969 A.2d. 621 (Pa. Super.2009)]. 31:100-1.Purdy, Pamela L. Interim Custody Order andStatus Quo not Control Subsequent School YearSchool District Determination. [Fox v. Garzilli,875 A.2d 1104 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. 27:118-20.Purdy, Pamela L. Prior Support HearingStipulation as to Earning Capacity not Binding inNew Petition for Modification. [Baehr v. Baehr,889A.2d.1240 (Pa. Super. 2005)]. 28:10-13.Rains, Robert E. Adding Uncertainty toUncertainty About Common Law Marriage. [PNCBank Corp. v. W.C.A.B (Stamos), 831 A.2d 1269(Pa Cmwlth. 2003)]. 25:101-4.Rains, Robert E. Intrastate Custody Relocation inAbsence of Prior Custody Order. [Beers v. Beers,710 A.2d 1206 (Pa. Super. 1998)]. 20:35-38.Redic, Geraldine M. Noncustodial Father WithoutStanding to Receive Accounting of TrustEstablished with Marital Funds Prior toSeparation. [Rock v. Pile, 720 A.2d 137 (Pa.Super. 1998)]. 21:8-10.Revelant, Angelica L. Lower Court Reversed forFailure to Relinquish Jurisdiction Pursuant toUCCJEA: Remand for Consideration of §5422(B).[Billhime v. Billhime, 952 A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super.2008)]. 30:158.Richardson, James H. Lump Sum Personal InjurySettlement Constitutes Income for SupportCalculations. [Darby v. Darby, 455 Pa. Super. 63,686 A.2d 1346 (1996)]. 19:29-31.Ronca, Daniel G. Custody Modification–The TrialCourt Must Assess the Potential Harm ofDisturbing Existing Custody Arrangements. [Johnsv. Cioci, 865 A.2d 931 (Pa. Super. 2004)]. 27:53-54.Rothey, Melanie S. Is ‘Home State’ Under theUCCJEA Decided by Which Judge Speaks FirstDuring a Two-State Judicial TelephoneConference? [Bouzos-Reilly v. Reilly, 980 A.2d.643 (Pa. Super. 2009)]. 31:164-65.Rothy, Melaine Shannon. An Attorney Held inContempt and Directed to Return AppointmentFees Prevails on Appeal. [In the Matter of C. W.,960 A.2d 458 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. 31:8-10.Sattin, Cheryl. Mother by Estoppel v. In LocoParentis Status. [S.A. v. C.G.R., 856 A.2d 1248(Pa. Super. 2004)]. 27:3-4.Schanbacher, David C. Superior Court ImposesContractual Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealingin Performance and Enforcement on Parties to a14