index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY SUBJECTTransfer of Pre-Marital Property into Joint NamesConstitutes Gift of Martial Entity. [Brown v. Brown,352 Pa. Super. 267, 507 A.2d 1223 (1986)]. 7:849-50.Transfer of Property Set Aside Under §403(d).[Krenzelak v. Krenzelak, 307 Pa. Super. 499, 453 A.2d998 (1982)]. 4:417-18.Transfer of Separate Property into Joint Names CreatesGift to the Marital Estate. [Burry v. Burry, 111 Montg.Co. L. Rep. 330 (1982)]. 4:407-9.True Disability Payments Held not Marital PropertySubject to Equitable Distribution. [Anderson v.Ciliberti, 374 Pa. Super.228, 542 A.2d 580 (1988)].9:45.Valuation Dates. [McNaughton v. McNaughton, 412Pa. Super. 409, 603 A.2d 646 (1992)]. 13(4):3.Valuation of Increase in Value of Inheritance. [Wintersv. Winters, 355 Pa. Super. 64, 512 A.2d 1124 (1986)].7:902-4.Valuation of Marital Property: Separation orDistribution Date. [Downey v. Downey, 399 Pa. Super.437, 582 A.2d 674 (1990)]. 12(1):6-7.Valuation of Marital Property: Separation or HearingDate. [Tocco v. Tocco, 389 Pa. Super. 310, 567 A.2d303 (1989)]. 10:121-22.Value of Marital Property Limited to Terms of LawFirm Partnership Agreement. [McCabe v. McCabe, 374Pa. Super. 451, 543 A.2d 558 (1988)]. 9:20.Whether a Verdict for Personal Injuries Is MaritalProperty Subject to Equitable Distribution. [Hurley v.Hurley, 342 Pa. Super. 156, 492 A.2d 439 (198 )].6:756-57.Workers’ Compensation Commutation Award isMarital Property. Status of Disability Pensions CalledInto Question. [Drake v. Drake, 555 Pa. 481, 725 A.2d717 (1999)]. Linda K. Bravacos. 21:40-42.DIVORCE–PENDING ACTIONS[Brief Synopsis of Recent Pending Action Cases.].[Kaufman v. Kaufman, 68 Del. Co. Rep. 326 (1980);Sclocchini v. Sclocchini, 68 Del. Co. Rep. 307 (1980);Reifsneider v. Reifsneider, 108 Montg. Co. Rep. 257(1981); Toll v. Toll, No. 73-8806 ]. 2:163.[Discussion of Issues Which Arise Where IrretrievableBreakdown has been Alleged as Grounds for Divorce inComplaint.]. [Rueckert v. Rueckert, 1 A.C.D.D. 55, 20D.&C.3d 191 (Allegh. Co., 1981)]. 2:161-63.Pending Actions: Order Granting Application toProceed Is Interlocutory and Non-Appealable. [Brunov. Bruno, 296 Pa. Super. 90, 442 A.2d 311 1 (1982)].3:293-94.Pending Actions–Superior Court Sets ForthAmendment Standards to be Used. [Gordon v. Gordon,293 Pa. Super. 491, 439 A. 2d 683 (1981); Toll v. Toll,293 Pa. Super. 549, 439 A. 2d 712 (1981); Conrad v.Conrad, 293 Pa. Super. 558, 439 A.2d 717 (1981);Kaskie v. Kaskie, 295 Pa. Super. 523, 442 A.2d 261(1982)]. 3:246-57.Recent Cases Concerning the Application of the NewDivorce Code to Pending Actions. [Tanker v. Tanker,(Phil Co., F.D. Dec. 1979, No. 2210 (1981); Bordner v.Bordner, 14 D.&C.3d 634 (Lebanon Co., 1980); Grossv. Gross, 281 Pa. Super. 45, 421 A.2d 1139 (1980);Wilson v. Wilson, 67 Del. Co. R. 724 (1980); Johns v.Johns, Chester Co., No. 11 N 1979 (1980)]. 1:83-87.Recent Cases With Respect to the Applicability of theNew Code to Pending Actions. [Stuckart v. Stuckart,Monroe Co., Civ. No. 494 (1980); Stone v. Stone,Monroe Co., Civ. No. 510 (1980); Nicholas v.Nicholas, 63 Del. Co. R. 138 (1980); Homsher v.Homsher, Blumberg v. Blumberg, 63 Del. Co. R. 158(1980); Conrad v. Conrad, 129 P.L.J. 46 (1980); Shudav. Shuda, 283 Pa. Super. 253, 423 A.2d 1242 (1980);Kaskie v. Kaskie, 61 Wash. Co. R. 67 (1980)]. 2:120-26.DIVORCE-POST-SEPARATIONBerrington Held Applicable to Defined Benefit Plan inImmediate Offset Case–Early Retirement IncentivesOffered Post-Separation Excluded from Marital Estate.[Gordon v. Gordon, 545 Pa. 391, 681 A.2d 732(1996)]. Susan J. Beckert. 18(4):10-12.Marital Funds Cannot be Used to Pay Post-Separation79