index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLECarolyn Moran Zack. 29:87-88.State Court has Jurisdiction Over Non-ResidentAlien in Divorce Action. [Sinha v. Sinha, 341 Pa.Super. 440, 491 A.2d 1399 (1985)]. 6:764-67.State Employees Pension Contributions in Lieu ofSocial Security are not Marital Property Subject toEquitable Distribution. [Schneeman v. Schneeman,420 Pa. Super. 65, 615 A.2d 1369 (1992)].14(2):2-3.Statutory Standing in Grandparent Custody Cases.[Martinez v. Baxter, 725 A.2d 775 (Pa. Super.1999)]. Sally R. Miller. 21:35-36.“Stay At Home Mom" of Second MarriageToddler has No Support Obligation for First-Marriage Teenager Triggering Debate by DividedPanel. [Atkinson v. Atkinson, 420 Pa. Super. 146,616 A.2d 22 (1992)]. 14(1):5-6.Stock Options are Income for Support Purposes.[MacKinley v. Messersschmidt, 814 A.2d 680 (Pa.Super. 2002)]. Joseph P. Martone. 25:9-10.Stress but No Duress: Agreement Valid. [Adamsv. Adams, 848 A.2d 991 (Pa. Super. 2004)].Michael E. Bertin. 26:45-46.Strict Adherence is Required Concerning Venue inthe Issue of Divorce Decrees. [Danz v. Danz, 947A.2d 750 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Christine Gale.30:150-51.Subsequent Filed Divorce Action with Claim forEquitable Distribution does not Preempt orSupersede Prior Filed Partition Action. [Goldsteinv. Goldstein, 354 Pa. Super. 490, 512 A.2d 644(1986)]. 7:868-873.Subsequent Mortgage Takes Priority OverUnrevived Equitable Distribution Judgment. [Mid-State Bank & Trust Co. v. Globalnet International,Inc., 557 Pa. 555, 735 A.2d 79 (1999)]. David I.Grunfeld. 21:75-76.Successful Physician Held to be Responsible toReturn Funds Borrowed from His Father-In-LawWhile a Medical Student. [Hornyak v. Sell v. Sell,427 Pa. Super. 356, 627 A.2d 138 (1993)].14(5):8-9.Successor Entities, Judgments and Leases. CaronP. Graff and Elizabeth L. Bennett. [Gioia v. Gioia,382 Pa. Super. 538, 555 A.2d 1330 (1989)].10(2):76-77.Sunny Florida: Relocation Granted. [Billhime v.Billhime, 869 A.2d 1031 (Pa. Super. 2005)].Michael E. Bertin.27:59-61.Superior Court Addresses Appealability ofSpousal Support Orders. [Calibeo v. Calibeo, 443Pa. Super. 694, 663 A.2d 184 (1995)]. 17(4):7.Superior Court Addresses Interplay of PFA andCustody Order. [Dye for McCoy v. McCoy, 423Pa. Super. 334, 621 A.2d 144 (1993)]. 14(3):6-7.Superior Court Affirms Decision to DeclineJurisdiction Under UCCJEA After Full CustodyHearing Where One Parent Remains inJurisdiction and Underlying Custody OrderOstensibly Retains Jurisdiction. [A.D. v. M.A.B.,989 A.2d 32 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Ann M. Funge.32:68-70.Superior Court Affirms Denial of Visitation toParents of Biological Father, Whose ParentalRights Had Been Terminated. [Rigler v. Treen,442 Pa. Super. 533, 660 A.2d 111 (1995)].17(5):7.Superior Court Affirms Modification of SupportOrder Due to Changed Circumstances. [Farabaughv. Killen, 436 Pa. Super. 480, 648 A.2d 60(1994)]. 16(5):6-7.Superior Court Affirms Order of Trial CourtDirecting Abused Woman to Pay PerpetratorMoney Per the Terms of a Consent Order. [Lee v.Carney, 435 Pa. Super. 405, 645 A.2d 1363(1993)]. 16(5):7-8.Superior Court Affirms Trial Court’s Dismissal ofFather’s Petition for Modification of ChildSupport. [McClain v. McClain, 872 A.2d 856 (Pa.Super. 2005)]. Mary H. Burchik. 27:115-17.51