index to the pennsylvania family lawyer volumes 1-32 compiled by ...

CASE DIGESTS BY TITLELocal Rule Which Limits Right to a Hearing DeNovo Declared Invalid. [Warner v. Pollock, 434Pa. Super. 551, 644 A.2d 747 (1994)]. 16(4):9-10.Lottery Ticket Proceeds and EquitableDistribution. [Nufher v. Nufher, 410 Pa. Super.380, 599 A.2d 1348 (1991)]. 13(1):3.Lower Court Reversed for Failure to RelinquishJurisdiction Pursuant to UCCJEA: Remand forConsideration of §5422(B). [Billhime v. Billhime,952 A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super. 2008)]. Angelica L.Revelant. 30:158.Lump Sum Personal Injury Settlement ConstitutesIncome for Support Calculations. [Darby v. Darby,455 Pa. Super. 63, 686 A.2d 1346 (1996)]. JamesH. Richardson. 19:29-31.Mailbox Rule Applied to Domestic RelationHearing Notices. [Murphy v. Murphy, 988 A.2d703 (Pa. Super. 2010)]. Elizabeth J. McCall.32:70-71.Marital Funds Cannot be Used to Pay Post-Separation Debts. [Grandovic v. Grandovic, 387Pa. Super. 617, 564 A.2d 960 (1989)]. Emanuel A.Bertin. 10:121.Marital Misconduct not a Bar to a Bar to AlimonyPendente Lite. [Siciliano v. Siciliano, 3 A.C.D.D.72 (Allegh. Co., 1982)]. 3:334-35.Marital Property: CSRS Pension. [Cornbleth v.Cornbleth, 397 Pa. Super. 421, 580 A.2d 369(1990)]. 11:182-83.Marriage Settlement Agreement Upheld WhenSpouse of Business Owner Fully Engaged inCouple’s Financial Affairs and Involved inBusiness. [Paroly v. Paroly, 876 A.2d 1061 (Pa.Super. 2005)]. Christine Gale. 27:120-21.Marry At Haste, Divorce from Previous MarriageSpouse at Leisure? Second Marriage Still Valid.[Covington v. Covington, 421 Pa. Super. 328, 617A.2d 1318 (1992)]. 14(3):9-10.Mass Media Expert not an Expert to MakePhysical and Psychological Conclusions fromFrequent Visits to Pornography Internet Sites.[A.J.B. v. M.P.B., 945 A.2d 744 (Pa. Super.2008)]. Erin Farabaugh. 30:88-90.The Mature Minor Doctrine No Defense toInvoluntary Manslaughter of Child not ProvidedMedical Treatment. [Com. v. Nixon, 563 Pa. 425,761 A.2d 1151 (2000)]. Donna M. McKillop.23:11-13.McFadden v. McFadden: A Double Dip at thePension Well. Patricia G. Miller. [McFadden v.McFadden, 386 Pa. Super. 506, 563 A.2d 180(1989)]. 10(4):110-111.The Meaning of the 1988 Divorce CodeAmendments Clarified. [Woodings v. Woodings,411 Pa. Super. 406, 601 A.2d 854 (1992)].Emanuel A. Bertin. 13(1):2.Medical License is Marital Property. [O'Brien v.O'Brien, 359 Pa. Super. 594, 519 A.2d 511(1985)]. 7:820-24.Medical License not Marital Property. [Hodge v.Hodge, 513 Pa. 264, 520 A.2d 15 (1986)]. 8:928-33.Melzer Analysis Requires Calculation ofChildren’s Reasonable Needs Separate from Thoseof the Custodial Parent’s. [Chapman-Rolle v.Rolle, 893A.2d 770 (Pa. Super. 2006)]. AndrewD. Taylor. 28:104-5.Melzer Calculation not Affected by SharedCustody. [Bulgarelli v. Bulgarelli, 934 A.2d 107(Pa. Super. 2007)]. Julia Swain. 29:129-30.Melzer Guidelines: A New Analysis. [Olson v.Olson, 384 Pa. Super. 224, 558 A.2d 93 (1989)].10:92-93.Melzer Guidelines Revisited. [Marshall v. Ross,373 Pa. Super. 235, 540 A.2d 954 (1988)]. 9:22-23.Melzer not Applicable to High-Income SpousalSupport Cases, Says Supreme Court. [Mascaro v.Mascaro, 803 A.2d 1186 (Pa. 2002)]. Brian C.Vertz. 24:102-4.38