12.07.2015 Views

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Persistence of L<strong>in</strong>guistic Deficit 129might, after all, reta<strong>in</strong> some validity. Tough (1982) argues here for astereotypically ‘deficit’ view of speech patterns <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g-class <strong>home</strong>s, anargument she had made earlier (Tough, 1977) and which she cont<strong>in</strong>ued tomake (Tough, 1985). Ano<strong>the</strong>r contributor also muddied <strong>the</strong> picture byclaim<strong>in</strong>g that disadvantaged children do have deficits, which are notl<strong>in</strong>guistic but are ra<strong>the</strong>r deficiencies of knowledge; <strong>the</strong>se lead, <strong>the</strong>n, tosmaller vocabularies (Snow, 1982). While at first blush it would seem thatmatters of vocabulary are matters of language, it is apparent on reflectionthat <strong>the</strong> size and shape of a group’s vocabulary are best understood asproducts of environmental exigency. And this br<strong>in</strong>gs us back to differencera<strong>the</strong>r than deficit. After all, <strong>the</strong>re are many human groups who lack <strong>the</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ology of higher ma<strong>the</strong>matics, who have no word for ‘laser’; andwhat does this prove about any <strong>in</strong>nate cognitive deficiency?Overall, <strong>the</strong> argument that I made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second edition of a bookabout language and disadvantage (Edwards, 1989, see also Edwards2006) and complementary suggestions made by Crowley (2003) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>second edition of his book on standard language seem justified. Varioustypes of ‘deficit’ models cont<strong>in</strong>ue to have adherents, both with<strong>in</strong> andwithout <strong>the</strong> educational world. There are ‘important cont<strong>in</strong>uities with <strong>the</strong>th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> repetition of many of <strong>the</strong> same po<strong>in</strong>tsof confusion and difficulty’ (Crowley, 2003: 231). In similar fashion,Wolfram (1998a) recently acknowledged that ‘entrenched myths aboutlanguage <strong>in</strong>adequacy are like a jack-<strong>in</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-box that keeps spr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g backup’; he goes on to say that<strong>the</strong> exposure of one l<strong>in</strong>e of reason<strong>in</strong>g as objectively unjustified andillogical doesn’t mean that l<strong>in</strong>guistic equality will be atta<strong>in</strong>ed. If <strong>the</strong>bottom-l<strong>in</strong>e belief is that one cultural group and by extension itslanguage is <strong>in</strong>ferior to ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>n ano<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>e of reason<strong>in</strong>g willsimply replace <strong>the</strong> old one. (Wolfram, 1998a: 105)Perhaps <strong>the</strong>re is someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature of socially stratifiedsocieties that will always f<strong>in</strong>d a way to translate cultural difference <strong>in</strong>todeficiency. But even if this ra<strong>the</strong>r gloomy assessment is correct even ifwe can only hope to scotch <strong>the</strong> snake, not kill it we should makewhatever assaults we can on <strong>in</strong>accurate and prejudiced <strong>in</strong>terpretations.The Honey affairIn Brita<strong>in</strong>, some of <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g controversy has been stimulated by<strong>the</strong> work of John Honey. It is worth consider<strong>in</strong>g here, not only because of<strong>the</strong> prom<strong>in</strong>ence it achieved, but also because it represents so well <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!