12.07.2015 Views

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bil<strong>in</strong>gualism: A Very Brief Overview 241what has been known for a long time. None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>y all usefullyemphasize <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g and, with<strong>in</strong> it, <strong>the</strong> desires, needs,attitudes and motivations of ord<strong>in</strong>ary people. And <strong>the</strong>y all scotch <strong>the</strong>myth that some people, or some groups, have no ‘head’ for languages,and that second-language aptitude is a rare commodity usually best seen<strong>in</strong> non-anglophones.This br<strong>in</strong>gs us to ano<strong>the</strong>r important topic: <strong>the</strong> relationship betweenbil<strong>in</strong>gualism and <strong>in</strong>telligence. It is one th<strong>in</strong>g to say that all normal peoplehave <strong>the</strong> basic capacity to expand <strong>the</strong>ir l<strong>in</strong>guistic repertoires, and thatdo<strong>in</strong>g so exacts no cognitive price. But what of <strong>the</strong> notion thatbil<strong>in</strong>gualism can <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>tellectual scope? It is an historically commonview that one’s personality expands with extra languages, particularlyamong those already bil<strong>in</strong>gual and, more particularly still, among <strong>the</strong>social élite for whom an additional language or two was always an<strong>in</strong>tegral part of civilized life. 3Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, early studies tended to associate bil<strong>in</strong>gualismwith lowered <strong>in</strong>telligence, and it is unsurpris<strong>in</strong>g that many of <strong>the</strong>m wereconducted <strong>in</strong> America at a time of great concern with <strong>the</strong> flood ofimmigrants from Europe (roughly, 19001920). As we have seen <strong>in</strong> earlierchapters, <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence-test<strong>in</strong>g movement itself is afasc<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g and detailed one, as well as an example of <strong>the</strong> misuse of‘science’ when allied with ignorance and prejudice. In addition, however,to <strong>the</strong> negative associations between bil<strong>in</strong>gualism and <strong>in</strong>telligence thatstemmed from social fears and prejudices, <strong>the</strong>re have also been moredis<strong>in</strong>terested studies that po<strong>in</strong>ted to problems here. Virtually all wereflawed, however, by <strong>in</strong>adequate controls <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir experimental procedures.The problem of statistical <strong>in</strong>ference has been even more important:if one observes a correlation between measured <strong>in</strong>telligence andbil<strong>in</strong>gualism, <strong>the</strong>n has <strong>the</strong> first caused <strong>the</strong> second, or vice versa, or is<strong>the</strong>re a third factor (perhaps unknown or unmeasured) that <strong>in</strong>fluencesboth and thus accounts for <strong>the</strong>ir relationship? Correlation need not implycausation.Later research tended to show essentially no relationship between<strong>in</strong>telligence and bil<strong>in</strong>gualism, and this work was generally more carefullydone than <strong>the</strong> earlier studies. Controll<strong>in</strong>g for gender, age and socialclassdifferences became common procedure, and <strong>the</strong> lack of such controlwas <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly seen to have produced <strong>the</strong> negative associations foundpreviously. What some have seen as a turn<strong>in</strong>g-po<strong>in</strong>t came <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early1960s, when f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show<strong>in</strong>g a positive relationship between <strong>in</strong>telligenceand bil<strong>in</strong>gualism began to appear. In Montreal, for <strong>in</strong>stance, Peal andLambert (1962) found that 10-year-old bil<strong>in</strong>gual children outperformed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!