12.07.2015 Views

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘Foreign’ <strong>Language</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Classroom</strong> 195extra-educational factors jobs, mobility, opportunity and so on and, ifthat is so, <strong>the</strong>n one might wonder why <strong>the</strong> strength of <strong>the</strong> AmericanHispanic community does not bolster <strong>the</strong> educational effort more.In fact, despite America’s multi-ethnic status <strong>in</strong> general, and itspowerful Hispanic components more specifically, we come back to acontext of anglophone dom<strong>in</strong>ance that obta<strong>in</strong>s both with<strong>in</strong> and withoutnational borders. It is a context that makes some recent comments byCarlos Fuentes (1999) seem ra<strong>the</strong>r naïve even though <strong>the</strong>y are em<strong>in</strong>entlyunderstandable, reflective of <strong>the</strong> views of many and, <strong>in</strong>deed, attractive <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir impulse. He asks why most Americans know only English and sees<strong>the</strong>ir monol<strong>in</strong>gualism as a ‘great paradox’: <strong>the</strong> United States is at once <strong>the</strong>supreme and <strong>the</strong> most isolated world power. Why, Fuentes cont<strong>in</strong>ued,does America ‘want to be a monol<strong>in</strong>gual country?’ All 21st-centuryAmericans ought to know more than one language, to better understand<strong>the</strong> world, to deal with cross-cultural problems, y demás. Obviously,monol<strong>in</strong>gualism is not a paradox, and to say that Americans ‘want’ to bemonol<strong>in</strong>gual would seem to miss <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t; it is simply that English servesacross virtually all <strong>the</strong> important doma<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>the</strong>ir lives.More subtly, though, it might be argued that Americans do <strong>in</strong>deed‘want’ to be monol<strong>in</strong>gual, or, to put it more aptly, <strong>the</strong>y see no compell<strong>in</strong>greason to expand <strong>the</strong>ir repertoires. In such a climate, it is easy to see what<strong>the</strong> consequences are likely to be for language teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g atschool. Given some of <strong>the</strong> less rational ramifications of <strong>the</strong> 2001 attackson New York City, it is also easy to see that not only do languages o<strong>the</strong>rthan English appear unnecessary, <strong>the</strong>ir use can be seen as downrightun-American, <strong>the</strong>ir speakers as unwill<strong>in</strong>g to throw <strong>the</strong>mselves wholeheartedly<strong>in</strong>to that wonderful melt<strong>in</strong>g-pot, <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g allegiance too<strong>the</strong>r cultures a suspect commodity. And, of course, such broaderperceptions feed back <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> educational arena, and so we return yetaga<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> wider society beyond <strong>the</strong> school gates forwhat ultimately transpires with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m; and, relatedly, to <strong>the</strong> importantfact occasionally overlooked or ignored that schools are most efficientas reflections of that wider society and not as <strong>in</strong>novative vanguards ofchang<strong>in</strong>g attitudes and behavior.<strong>Language</strong> and ‘Empowerment’Aga<strong>in</strong> here, we can note <strong>the</strong> longstand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests and manycontributions of Fishman for a recent expression, see Fishman (2006);see also Pütz et al. (2006). It is quite clear that power relationships particularly, of course, those that are markedly unequal are beh<strong>in</strong>d all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!