12.07.2015 Views

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

Language Diversity in the Classroom - ymerleksi - home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182 <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Diversity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Classroom</strong>sap motivation, decrease expectations, re<strong>in</strong>force low self-esteem and soon. This is clearly true, but later research has added ano<strong>the</strong>r possibility:low academic motivation may also stem from a view of education thatsees it as unimportant and/or unattractive. (The two possibilities areobviously not mutually exclusive.) Graham et al. (1998) used a ‘peernom<strong>in</strong>ation’ procedure to <strong>in</strong>vestigate this; that is, <strong>the</strong>y asked students totell <strong>the</strong>m who among <strong>the</strong>ir classmates <strong>the</strong>y admired and respected.Among white pupils, both boys and girls valued o<strong>the</strong>rs who were do<strong>in</strong>gwell at school. The choices made by African American and Lat<strong>in</strong>o boys,on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, suggested a devaluation of academic achievement; seealso Taylor and Graham (2007). Similarly, Fryer and Levitt (2004a) havenoted that studious black pupils had fewer friends than did poorerstudents, that work<strong>in</strong>g hard may attract accusations of ‘act<strong>in</strong>g white’ andthat as a summary <strong>in</strong> The Economist (2008: 34) put it it seems to be‘cool to be dumb... it would be hard to imag<strong>in</strong>e a more crippl<strong>in</strong>gcultural norm’.Graham et al. (1998: 606) go on to note that all participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>irstudy boys and girls, white, black and Hispanic associated ‘academicdisengagement and social deviance with be<strong>in</strong>g male, a low achiever, andan ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority’. There seemed to be a general negative stereotype atwork, one that viewed low-achiev<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>ority-group boys as not try<strong>in</strong>ghard at school, and not follow<strong>in</strong>g school norms and rules. Theresearchers cont<strong>in</strong>ue:We suspect that <strong>the</strong> African American and Lat<strong>in</strong>o boys <strong>in</strong> ourresearch are well aware of how <strong>the</strong>y are seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eyes of o<strong>the</strong>rs andthat this awareness may have <strong>in</strong>fluenced what appeared to be <strong>the</strong>irrelative <strong>in</strong>difference to those who display achievement behaviors thatare valued by <strong>the</strong> larger society. Steele (1997) has written poignantlyabout how cop<strong>in</strong>g with negative stereotypes about <strong>the</strong>ir academiccompetence has led many African American students to academicallydisengage and discount <strong>the</strong> importance of school success.(Graham et al., 1998: 618)The more <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g questions are ‘underneath’, as it were: how andwhy does lack of <strong>in</strong>terest arise <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first place, and how and why is itma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed when <strong>the</strong>re is so much evidence of its negative lifeconsequences? For <strong>the</strong> answers here, we have to look far beyond <strong>the</strong>school gates.In all of this, of course disidentification, oppositional identities,resistance to ‘talk<strong>in</strong>g white’ (see Chapter 8) or do<strong>in</strong>g well <strong>in</strong> school wemust remember that we are not deal<strong>in</strong>g with monolithic categories of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!