12.07.2015 Views

Preparing for the Miraculous

Preparing for the Miraculous

Preparing for the Miraculous

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 eleven talksimproving or worsening <strong>the</strong> lot of <strong>the</strong> creatures of <strong>the</strong> gods,and sometimes of <strong>the</strong> gods <strong>the</strong>mselves. With one exception:<strong>the</strong> Hebrews. Their holy book told about an absolutebeginning, when Yahweh created heaven and earth, andeverything in it. According to Genesis, <strong>the</strong> book in whichthis is narrated, <strong>the</strong> world had a beginning.Physics and cosmology, successful in working out several<strong>the</strong>ories of cosmological mechanics, preferred at firstnot to trouble itself with an explanation of how <strong>the</strong> cosmicclockwork had been wound up. They supposed, <strong>for</strong> simplicity’ssake, that <strong>the</strong> universe had existed from infinity andwould continue existing in infinity, eternal and unchanging.Yet this opportunistic viewpoint began to be questioned in<strong>the</strong> 1920s. Because of <strong>the</strong> advances in nuclear physics, <strong>the</strong>composition and <strong>the</strong> life histories of <strong>the</strong> various types ofstars began to be known. Edwin Hubble’s astonishing discoveriesseemed to show that <strong>the</strong> universe was expanding.All this lead to a model of <strong>the</strong> universe which is still presentedin <strong>the</strong> text books and by <strong>the</strong> media as <strong>the</strong> standardmodel (but which is in fact severely questioned).“We can say that <strong>the</strong> Big Bang <strong>the</strong>ory is currently regardedas a well-established <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>the</strong> standard-modelacceptable to most physicists, and that <strong>the</strong> questions thatremain do not cast serious suspicions on it.” Thus wroteKitty Ferguson in The Fire in <strong>the</strong> Equations, published in1994. 6 Lee Smolin, however, opines: “We, who are used to<strong>the</strong> idea now, can only speculate about how hard it was toaccept <strong>the</strong> notion that <strong>the</strong> universe might have had a beginning.”7 Indeed, in 1933 <strong>the</strong> universe was still assumedto be eternal and unchanging, and when Albert Einstein,<strong>the</strong>n already a celebrity, endorsed <strong>the</strong> first propositions of6 Kitty Ferguson: The Fire in <strong>the</strong> Equations, p. 126.7 Lee Smolin: The Trouble with Physics, p. 151.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!