09.12.2012 Views

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

civilisation. In this situation, <strong>Hell</strong> and Sajnovics filled the second edition of the Demonstratio<br />

with references to several Hungarian-speaking erudites, most of whom were Jesuits, who had<br />

read the first edition and embraced its main thesis: that there existed a close kinship between<br />

Hungarian and Sámi. What is more, the concluding chapter contains explicit reference to the<br />

support of Maria Theresa, and (more vaguely) to “each and every one of the highest men” in<br />

the Hungarian capital Posonium. 239 However, by 1770 it was not sufficient to appeal to the<br />

patronage of Maria Theresa and her protégés, for the Empress had become increasingly<br />

estranged from her Hungarian Guards after a bitter confrontation with the Hungarian Diet in<br />

1764-65. Nevertheless, in the local context of Vienna and Hungary, the discovery of a<br />

Hungarian-Lappish relationship, and the speculations concerning the historical heritage of the<br />

Hungarian nation that it entailed, was the main ‘scientific capital’ that the two Jesuits had<br />

assembled in the High North. Father <strong>Hell</strong> was not willing to let all that honour remain with his<br />

assistant. Nor was he willing to let his legitimacy as an authoritative investigator of Hungarian<br />

history, which he planned to develop further in his grand Expeditio litteraria, be challenged<br />

on the grounds that he did not master the Hungarian language. This explains why<br />

<strong>Maximilianus</strong> <strong>Hell</strong> insisted on being ascribed the honour of the Lappish-Hungarian discovery,<br />

and to be characterised as a native Hungarian alongside Sajnovics.<br />

A “third edition” of the Demonstratio was to be published within the framework of the<br />

Expeditio litteraria – or to be precise, it was to fill the third part of volume one. The<br />

correspondence of <strong>Hell</strong> from 1771-72, along with several unfinished treatises and notes<br />

preserved among his papers at the Vienna University Observatory, bear witness of an acute<br />

interest in the ‘Hungarian question’. 240 Major sources for the early history of the Magyars<br />

were examined by Father <strong>Hell</strong> in this period, including ‘The Deeds of the Hungarians’ (Gesta<br />

Hungarorum) written around the year 1200 by the so-called Anonymus, or Notary of King<br />

Bela, and the De Administrando Imperio (‘On How to Govern the Empire’) of Constantinus<br />

Porphyrogenitus, a Byzantine Emperor and writer of the tenth century. 241<br />

239 Sajnovics [1771], p. 127: “quemquam ex summis in Republica nostra Viris, […] prout mihi experiri licuit,<br />

quando superiore Autumno plerosque Eorum præsens veneratus sum”.<br />

240 See Unprinted Sources 1c and 2c.<br />

241 Two chapters of the Expeditio litteraria were supposed to be devoted to the Anonymus and to Constantinus<br />

VII Porphyrogenitus respectively (See Chapter III.2, Tomi I. Pars III. Caput VI-VII). On the Anonymus, see now<br />

the edition of Martyn Rady and László Veszprémy in the outstanding series Central European Medieval Texts<br />

(Anonymus 2010). On Porphyrogenitus, see the edition by Moravcsik, Jenkins and Dvornik (Constantine VII<br />

Porphygenitus 1962-67).<br />

- 123 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!