09.12.2012 Views

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two choices have been made in the above account. First, I have deliberately tried to interpret<br />

<strong>Hell</strong>’s career within the context of the Austrian Province of the Society of Jesus. It was this<br />

administrative division that was constitutive to his early career, rather than the borders of the<br />

state. By breaking down national barriers that have proven themselves virtually<br />

insurmountable to those who prefer to interpret <strong>Hell</strong>’s career as part of the history of a single<br />

nation state, I hope to have contributed to an appreciation of his biography that is more in tune<br />

with the realities of eighteenth-century Central Europe. The second choice has been to<br />

interpret his activities within the framework of Habsburg politics. This has led to a second<br />

lesson, which in a sense contradicts the above interpretation. <strong>Maximilianus</strong> <strong>Hell</strong> was not only<br />

a Jesuit and an exponent of Jesuit science, as one might think when reading the series of<br />

‘parallel lives’ presented above. <strong>Hell</strong> was also a representative of the Habsburg Empire. For<br />

example, his work instruction explicitly demanded international contacts. This was hardly part<br />

of the professional work instruction of the average Jesuit professor in the Austrian province of<br />

the Society of Jesus. Therefore, to interpret Father <strong>Hell</strong> as a Jesuit and little else, hardly does<br />

justice to his career. Rather, he should be seen as an official representative of the Austrian<br />

Province of the Jesuit order and of the Habsburg Empire. After the dissolution of the Society<br />

of Jesus, he became a man of conflicting loyalties and at times self-contradictory political<br />

statements, strategies and practices. His loyalties became increasingly alienated from the<br />

policies of his rulers, although he never resigned from his office as court astronomer. In this<br />

sense too, he was a human being – neither a monster nor a saint.<br />

In coming chapters of this thesis, the contributions of <strong>Maximilianus</strong> <strong>Hell</strong> to the eighteenth-<br />

century efforts to calculate the solar parallax will be analysed. The two transits of Venus both<br />

fall within the part of <strong>Hell</strong>’s career as a Jesuit Professor and Court Astronomer. However, the<br />

calculations based on the 1769 transit of Venus were made in an atmosphere of an imminent<br />

and finally real spiritual disaster to the main character of this thesis. Neither did the<br />

suppression of the Society of Jesus pass unnoticed for <strong>Hell</strong>’s colleagues in France, Germany,<br />

Russia and Scandinavia. To what extent the rhetoric directed against the Jesuits by<br />

enlightened philosophes influenced the professional work of European astronomers in the<br />

1760s and 1770s is a complex question, which will be addressed later.<br />

- 182 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!