09.12.2012 Views

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Despite radical changes in the institutional organisation of science in the Habsburg lands in<br />

the wake of the year 1773, the Imperial and Royal Observatory of Vienna remained intact.<br />

The number of assistants may have been reduced, but the court astronomer himself sat safe in<br />

his chair. Whilst his colleagues abroad feared that the Ephemerides might be discontinued or<br />

the Imperial Observatory shut down, 354 nothing of the sort happened. Instead, the annual<br />

volumes of the Viennese ephemeris were churned out of the press as before, with supplements<br />

presenting long lists of observations as well as theoretically ambitious treatises.<br />

Two hundred meters away, however, the Jesuit Observatory of Vienna was closed shortly<br />

after the suppression of the Society. The director Liesganig, whom we met in Subsection<br />

I.2.2.1 above, was appointed professor at the former Jesuit collegium of Galician Leopolis, 355<br />

which had come under Austrian rule in the aftermath of the first partition of Poland in<br />

1772. 356 From his base in Leopolis, Liesganig conducted extensive surveys of the new<br />

Habsburg province of Galicia and served as the director of an observatory that had been<br />

founded by the Jesuits around 1769. 357 As Liesganig passed away in 1799, he left a large<br />

collection of manuscripts from his surveys in Galicia. He did not, however, publish any<br />

observations from Leopolis in the Ephemerides Astrononomicae edited by <strong>Hell</strong> and<br />

Triesnecker. Back in Vienna, the Jesuit observatory seems not to have been manned at all<br />

after Liesganig’s departure for Leopolis in 1774. In a letter to Weiss, dated Vienna 12<br />

November 1783, <strong>Hell</strong> explains that 358<br />

I have managed to save the observatory of the Viennese academic collegium,<br />

which surely, in case I had been absent from Vienna at that time, would have<br />

354 See for example Bernoulli 1776b, pp. 9-10.<br />

355 Leopolis (L) = Lemberg (G), Lwów (Polish), L’vov (Russian), L’viv (Ukrainian). Udías mistakedly locates<br />

“Lemberg” to Alsace in France (sic! Udías 2003, p. 31).<br />

356 The Jesuit collegium of Leopolis was founded in 1661, received papal approbation as a university as late as<br />

the year 1759, a status it lost in 1773. For the next decade, it was known as the Theresianum, or academy for<br />

noblemen, until Joseph II renewed its university status in 1784.<br />

357 The observatory is missing entirely in Howse 1986. Udías conjectures that this observatory was founded by<br />

Liesganig (Udías 2003, p. 31). However, Brosche 2009a, p. 25 includes an engraving of “das Observatorium des<br />

Jesuiten-Collegs 1771” (“the observatory of the Jesuit collegium, 1771”) and an official webpage of the Ministry<br />

of Education and Science of Ukraine gives the year of founding as 1769<br />

http://www.lnu.edu.ua/Subdivisions/PROPERTY/astro/astro_eng_bg.htm (accessed 30 May 2011). According to<br />

Fischer 1984, pp. 139 & 147, a Ludowicus Hoszowski SJ (1732-post 1773) served as professor of mathematics<br />

at the Jesuit collegium in Leopolis from 1769 to 1773. During 1771-73, Hoszowski was also entered in the Jesuit<br />

catalogues as Professor astronomiae and Praefectus musei mathematici at the same collegium, but he left for an<br />

ecclesiastical post in Przemyslia after the suppression and seems never to have become part of the team around<br />

Liesganig (ibid.).<br />

358 <strong>Hell</strong> to Weiss, dated Vienna 12 November 1783 (Vargha priv.): “Speculam Colegij Academici Viennensis a<br />

Cæsare conservatam obtinui, quæ certissime, si Viennâ id temporis abfuissem, sublata, et deposita fuisset, eo,<br />

quod Architectus verba Cæsaris male interpretatus fuerit”.<br />

- 165 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!