09.12.2012 Views

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

Maximilianus Hell (1720-1792) - Munin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

estore the studies at the universities of our hereditary realms, which now lie<br />

with their backs broken, to their ancient status and spirit in the same manner as<br />

the university studies were restored during the reign of the pious Emperor<br />

Ferdinand II, at first in Vienna in the year 1623, and thereafter in all the cities of<br />

the Austrian hereditary realms.<br />

Finally, in a particularly long and bitter letter to the bishop, <strong>Hell</strong> laments over the dissolution<br />

of the Society of Jesus, and what he calls the seminaria Antichristi (‘seminars of Antichrist’)<br />

that had replaced the theology studies at the university since the Jesuit professors were<br />

removed from their posts. As a result of the implementation of compulsory teaching in<br />

German, knowledge of Latin had seen such a rapid decline among university students that<br />

even mass at the University Church was now held in the vernacular. As a result, young<br />

women attended, and flirted overtly with the (male) students. The fair sex would not have<br />

been present, <strong>Hell</strong> argues, if only the masses had been celebrated in Latin as they used to be in<br />

the ‘good old days’ before the suppression of the Society of Jesus. 321<br />

In the elderly <strong>Hell</strong>’s arguments for the preservation (or restoration) of Latin, his old loyalties<br />

ran together. As a Hungarus, he wished to see Latin prevail as the lingua franca of his<br />

multiethnic fatherland. As a partisan of the conservative forces of the Catholic church, he<br />

savoured a glorious past in which there existed a single, universal language for the servants of<br />

God. As a representative of the Republic of Letters, he saw the benefits of the Latin language<br />

for communication across linguistic and political boundaries. In this sense, he was indeed<br />

facing backwards. But he was also a pragmatic.<br />

<strong>Hell</strong>’s promotion of the Magyar language has been discussed in Section I.2.3 above. Given his<br />

position as a mentor, and almost even a ‘censor’, of Sajnovics’ Demonstratio, certain<br />

formulations are worth pointing to. The Sámi dialect, with its rich and to a large extent<br />

protected vocabulary thanks to its isolation in the High North, ought to be used to enrich the<br />

Hungarian language, it is argued. 322 Furthermore, the Demonstratio claims that Hungarian<br />

(and Lappish) is a language that is inferior to no other language, even superior to many others<br />

320 <strong>Hell</strong> to Bishop Eszterházy in Agria, dated Vienna 1 November 1790 (Vargha priv.): “[…] si inquam fructum<br />

tulerit speratum, ut studia Universitatum in Regnis nostris hæreditariis penitus prostrata, ad statum, et spiritum<br />

primævum restaurentur eo modo, quo sub pio Jmperatore Ferdinando II anno 1623 restaurata fuere Viennæ, et<br />

subinde in aliis Urbibus Regnorum hæreditariorum Austriæ.”<br />

321 <strong>Hell</strong> to Bishop Eszterházy in Agria, dated Vienna 11 November 1791 (Vargha priv.).<br />

322 Aspaas in press (in Finnish).<br />

- 155 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!